Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Blowing up a multiple point separates pairwise transverse components

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let S be a regular surface over a field k and let p be a closed point through which pass s≥2 distinct regular curves Y1,…,Ys, pairwise meeting transversally at p (contact orders one) and pairwise disjoint away from p. Let π ⁣:S′→S be the blowup of p with exceptional curve E. Then the strict transforms Yi′ meet E at s distinct points, no three support curves meet at a point of S′ (in particular at most two components pass through any point of E), and the only new intersections are the transverse intersections Yi′∩E at distinct points. If s=2 the two strict transforms become disjoint.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A regular surface S over k (a Noetherian scheme of dimension two regular at every point, in the sense of Contact order of two regular components at a point), a closed point p∈S, distinct regular curves Y1,…,Ys through p with s≥2, pairwise of contact order one at p and pairwise disjoint away from p, and the blowup π ⁣:S′→S of p with exceptional curve E.

[A1]

Choice. The Axiom of Choice is assumed, as in the statement; the cited suppliers used below are stated under it (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Contact order of two regular components at a point: For distinct reduced curves Y,Z through a closed point p of a regular surface, the total contact order is the sum of the local lengths np(Y,Z) and the definition records that np(Y,Z)=1 if and only if Y and Z meet transversally at p, meaning p∈Y∩Z, each of Y and Z is regular at p, and their tangent lines are distinct one-dimensional subspaces of the two-dimensional k(p)-vector space mp/mp2; in that case the local contact order is computed in the local-equation form np(Y,Z)=length⁡OY,p(OY,p/zOY,p) for a local equation z of Z.

[F2]

A point blowup lowers pairwise contact order by one and separates transverse branches: Let Y,Z be distinct regular curves through a closed point p of a regular surface with contact order n≥1, and let Y′,Z′ be their strict transforms under the blowup of p with exceptional curve E. If n=1, then Y′ and Z′ meet E at distinct points and are disjoint near E; if n>1, the strict transforms meet at the point of E corresponding to their common tangent direction with contact order n−1; every intersection of a strict transform with E has order one.

[F3]

Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps, Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains, Flat base change for blowups, and failure without flatness, The exceptional divisor is the projectivized normal cone and associated graded ring of a regular local ring: Localizing the base at p gives the charts A[(x,y)/x] and A[(x,y)/y], with inverse ratio overlap. The exceptional curve is Proj⁡gr⁡mA, hence Pκ(p)1 after choosing parameters, since dim⁡A=2 at the contact point. The quotient presentations follow from the regular-sequence torsion calculation below.

[F4]

The blowup is an isomorphism off the center: The restriction of the blowup to the complement of the center is an isomorphism: π ⁣:π−1(S∖{p})→S∖{p} is an isomorphism of schemes.

[F6]

Strict transform of a closed subscheme: The strict transform of a closed subscheme is the scheme-theoretic closure of its inverse image minus the exceptional divisor; on a chart where the ideal of E is invertible it is cut out by the saturation of the inverse-image ideal by the ideal of E.

[F7]

dimension at most embedding dimension, regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay, one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs and regular local quotient by parameter is regular: Regular local rings are domains, local dimension is at most embedding dimension, a regular parameter quotient is regular of dimension one less, and a regular hypersurface equation has multiplicity one.

[F8]

Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor: For a reduced curve of multiplicity one at the blown-up point, the strict transform is given by dividing its equation by the exceptional equation; its intersection with E is the divisor of its nonzero linear leading form.

Proof

1.1A1F1given

By [F1], since each pair Yi,Yj with i≠j has contact order np(Yi,Yj)=1, every Yi is regular at p and the tangent lines Ti⊆mp/mp2 are pairwise distinct one-dimensional k(p)-subspaces; moreover Yi∩Yj⊆{p} by the hypothesis that the curves are pairwise disjoint away from p.

2.1F1F3F6F7F8step 1.1

Fix i. Its regular prime quotient A/P has cotangent dimension one, so choose u∈P with nonzero cotangent class. The regular one-dimensional quotient A/(u) is a DVR; its prime P/(u) is zero because (A/(u))/(P/(u)) still has dimension one. Thus P=(u) and u is a principal equation of the curve germ. Regularity makes its initial form a nonzero linear form aX+bY. Choose regular parameters x,y so that b≠0. The x-chart is B=A[T]/(xT−y): reducing xg=(xT−y)h modulo x forces h=xh1, and cancellation proves the incidence quotient has no x-power torsion. In this ring its strict transform is cut by w=u/x, with w mod x=a+bT. Thus Yi′∩E is the single reduced point T=−a/b. The other chart A[U]/(yU−x) has equation w′=u/y with w′ mod y=aU+b; it gives the same point if a≠0, and none if a=0. This proves there are no other intersections with E. At that point the ambient local ring has maximal ideal (x,T+a/b) and prime chain (0)⊊(x)⊊(x,T+a/b); it has dimension and embedding dimension two, so is regular with this cotangent basis, and w has a nonzero coefficient on T+a/b. Hence Yi′ is regular there and its tangent line differs from E's. Equivalently its quotient by x is the residue field, giving contact length one.

3.1F2step 2.1

Applying [F2] with n=1 to each pair Yi,Yj, i≠j, the strict transforms meet E at distinct points; with the uniqueness of step 2.1 this says ei≠ej whenever i≠j, so Y1′,…,Ys′ meet E at the s distinct points e1,…,es.

4.1F2F4step 1.1step 3.1

For i≠j the strict transforms Yi′ and Yj′ are disjoint: near E this is [F2] with n=1, and outside E the blowup restricts to an isomorphism of S′∖E with S∖{p} by [F4], so a common point of Yi′ and Yj′ outside E would map to a common point of Yi and Yj different from p, which does not exist; hence Yi′∩Yj′=∅, and in particular the two strict transforms are disjoint when s=2.

5.1F3F4step 2.1step 4.1

Consequently no three of the support curves E,Y1′,…,Ys′ meet at a point of S′: each Yi′ meets E only in ei, the points ei are distinct, and the Yi′ are pairwise disjoint, so a point of E lies on at most one strict transform and a point outside E lies on at most one curve; every ei is a transverse intersection of E with Yi′ by step 2.1. The only intersections not present before the blowup are these points ei: the original curves met one another only at p, and each such intersection has been separated, while outside E the blowup creates no new intersections because it is an isomorphism there [F4].

6.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

Therefore Y1′,…,Ys′ meet E at the s distinct points e1,…,es, no three support curves meet at a point of S′, the only new intersections are the transverse intersections Yi′∩E={ei} at distinct points, and Y1′ and Y2′ are disjoint when s=2; this proves every clause of the statement.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

75 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources