How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Blowing up a multiple point separates pairwise transverse components
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a regular surface over a field and let be a closed point through which pass distinct regular curves , pairwise meeting transversally at (contact orders one) and pairwise disjoint away from . Let be the blowup of with exceptional curve . Then the strict transforms meet at distinct points, no three support curves meet at a point of (in particular at most two components pass through any point of ), and the only new intersections are the transverse intersections at distinct points. If the two strict transforms become disjoint.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A regular surface over (a Noetherian scheme of dimension two regular at every point, in the sense of Contact order of two regular components at a point), a closed point , distinct regular curves through with , pairwise of contact order one at and pairwise disjoint away from , and the blowup of with exceptional curve .
Choice. The Axiom of Choice is assumed, as in the statement; the cited suppliers used below are stated under it (The Axiom of Choice).
Contact order of two regular components at a point: For distinct reduced curves through a closed point of a regular surface, the total contact order is the sum of the local lengths and the definition records that if and only if and meet transversally at , meaning , each of and is regular at , and their tangent lines are distinct one-dimensional subspaces of the two-dimensional -vector space ; in that case the local contact order is computed in the local-equation form for a local equation of .
A point blowup lowers pairwise contact order by one and separates transverse branches: Let be distinct regular curves through a closed point of a regular surface with contact order , and let be their strict transforms under the blowup of with exceptional curve . If , then and meet at distinct points and are disjoint near ; if , the strict transforms meet at the point of corresponding to their common tangent direction with contact order ; every intersection of a strict transform with has order one.
Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps, Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains, Flat base change for blowups, and failure without flatness, The exceptional divisor is the projectivized normal cone and associated graded ring of a regular local ring: Localizing the base at gives the charts and , with inverse ratio overlap. The exceptional curve is , hence after choosing parameters, since at the contact point. The quotient presentations follow from the regular-sequence torsion calculation below.
The blowup is an isomorphism off the center: The restriction of the blowup to the complement of the center is an isomorphism: is an isomorphism of schemes.
Strict transform of a closed subscheme: The strict transform of a closed subscheme is the scheme-theoretic closure of its inverse image minus the exceptional divisor; on a chart where the ideal of is invertible it is cut out by the saturation of the inverse-image ideal by the ideal of .
dimension at most embedding dimension, regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay, one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs and regular local quotient by parameter is regular: Regular local rings are domains, local dimension is at most embedding dimension, a regular parameter quotient is regular of dimension one less, and a regular hypersurface equation has multiplicity one.
Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor: For a reduced curve of multiplicity one at the blown-up point, the strict transform is given by dividing its equation by the exceptional equation; its intersection with is the divisor of its nonzero linear leading form.
Proof
By [F1], since each pair with has contact order , every is regular at and the tangent lines are pairwise distinct one-dimensional -subspaces; moreover by the hypothesis that the curves are pairwise disjoint away from .
Fix . Its regular prime quotient has cotangent dimension one, so choose with nonzero cotangent class. The regular one-dimensional quotient is a DVR; its prime is zero because still has dimension one. Thus and is a principal equation of the curve germ. Regularity makes its initial form a nonzero linear form . Choose regular parameters so that . The -chart is : reducing modulo forces , and cancellation proves the incidence quotient has no -power torsion. In this ring its strict transform is cut by , with . Thus is the single reduced point . The other chart has equation with ; it gives the same point if , and none if . This proves there are no other intersections with . At that point the ambient local ring has maximal ideal and prime chain ; it has dimension and embedding dimension two, so is regular with this cotangent basis, and has a nonzero coefficient on . Hence is regular there and its tangent line differs from 's. Equivalently its quotient by is the residue field, giving contact length one.
Applying [F2] with to each pair , , the strict transforms meet at distinct points; with the uniqueness of step 2.1 this says whenever , so meet at the distinct points .
For the strict transforms and are disjoint: near this is [F2] with , and outside the blowup restricts to an isomorphism of with by [F4], so a common point of and outside would map to a common point of and different from , which does not exist; hence , and in particular the two strict transforms are disjoint when .
Consequently no three of the support curves meet at a point of : each meets only in , the points are distinct, and the are pairwise disjoint, so a point of lies on at most one strict transform and a point outside lies on at most one curve; every is a transverse intersection of with by step 2.1. The only intersections not present before the blowup are these points : the original curves met one another only at , and each such intersection has been separated, while outside the blowup creates no new intersections because it is an isomorphism there [F4].
Therefore meet at the distinct points , no three support curves meet at a point of , the only new intersections are the transverse intersections at distinct points, and and are disjoint when ; this proves every clause of the statement.
Depends on
- Contact order of two regular components at a point
- A point blowup lowers pairwise contact order by one and separates transverse branches
- The exceptional divisor is the projectivized normal cone
- associated graded ring of a regular local ring
- Flat base change for blowups, and failure without flatness
- Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps
- Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains
- The blowup is an isomorphism off the center
- Strict transform of a closed subscheme
- Effective cartier divisor
- dimension at most embedding dimension
- regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay
- Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor
- one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs
- regular local quotient by parameter is regular
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, generators modulo an ideal in the Jacobson radical lift to generators
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
75 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ravi Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, June 27, 2011 draft (author-hosted 'Early (out-of-date) version of The Rising Sea') (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry v6.10 (standard reference, not scraped)