Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regularization of an integral curve on an arbitrary Noetherian ambient scheme

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a Noetherian scheme and let Y⊆X be an integral closed subscheme of dimension one whose normalization is finite. Then there exists a finite sequence Xn⟶Xn−1⟶⋯⟶X1⟶X of blowups in closed points such that the strict transform of Y in Xn is a regular curve. If the closed points blown up in X are chosen to be the images of the corresponding centers of the intrinsic sequence for Y, the strict transform of Y in Xi is canonically the i-th intrinsic blowup of Y.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The intrinsic regularization theorem: since Y is integral, Noetherian, one-dimensional and has finite normalization, there are a finite sequence Yn→Yn−1→⋯→Y1→Y of blowups at non-regular closed points and a factorization of the normalization through every stage, and Yn is regular (Regularization of a one-dimensional integral curve with finite normalization by point blowups).

[F2]

Strict transform under a blowup: if Z⊆X is a closed subscheme and π:Bl⁡IX→X is a blowup, the strict transform of Z is canonically the blowup of Z in the inverse image ideal of I; on charts it is cut out by the saturation of the pullback ideal. The construction may be iterated on the strict transform along a further blowup (Strict transforms of closed subschemes are blowups of the subscheme, Strict transform of a closed subscheme).

[F3]

The blowup of a Noetherian scheme in a closed point is Noetherian: choose a finite affine open cover of the base by spectra of Noetherian rings (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes). The center ideal has finitely many generators on each chart, giving a finite standard affine chart cover of its blowup. Those chart rings are finitely generated algebras over Noetherian rings, hence Noetherian. The resulting finite affine cover makes the whole blowup Noetherian (Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps, Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring, Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf).

[F4]

A closed point of a closed subscheme is a closed point of the ambient scheme, and the strict transform of an integral curve at each stage is an integral closed subscheme of the ambient scheme, of dimension one (Integral schemes, Strict transform of a closed subscheme).

[F5]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed, inherited from the intrinsic sequence and the blowup suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

Given: AC, a Noetherian scheme X, an integral closed one-dimensional subscheme Y⊆X with finite normalization, and the intrinsic blowup sequence of [F1].

1.1F1

Apply [F1] to Y: this gives a finite sequence of closed points y0∈Y0=Y, y1∈Y1,…,yn−1∈Yn−1 with Yi=Bl⁡yi−1Yi−1, each yi−1 non-regular in Yi−1, and Yn regular. Since Yi−1 is integral of dimension one, each yi−1 is a closed point of Yi−1 (Integral schemes).

2.1F3F4step 1.1

Define the ambient sequence by X0=X and, inductively, Xi=Bl⁡zi−1Xi−1, where zi−1 is the image of yi−1 under the closed immersion Yi−1↪Xi−1 whose construction is the induction claim proved below. Each zi−1 is a closed point of Xi−1 by [F4], and each Xi is Noetherian by [F3].

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1

Claim: for every i the strict transform of Y in Xi is canonically isomorphic over Y to Yi; in particular Yi embeds in Xi as a closed subscheme, so the induction of step 2.1 is legitimate. For i=0 this is the identity Y0=Y. Assume it for i−1. The blowup Xi→Xi−1 is the blowup at the point zi−1∈Yi−1⊆Xi−1; by [F2] the strict transform of Yi−1 in Xi is the blowup of Yi−1 in the inverse image ideal of zi−1, which is the maximal ideal of the point yi−1, and this blowup is Bl⁡yi−1Yi−1=Yi. Since strict transforms may be iterated (the strict transform of Y in Xi equals the strict transform of the strict transform Yi−1 of Y in Xi−1, by the saturation description of [F2]), the strict transform of Y in Xi is Yi.

4.1F5step 1.1step 3.1∎

Taking i=n, the strict transform of Y in Xn is canonically Yn, which is regular by step 1.1; hence the finite sequence of blowups in closed points constructed in step 2.1 has the required property, and by construction its centers are the images of the intrinsic centers, so the canonical identification of strict transforms with the intrinsic blowups holds at every stage. This proves both assertions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources