How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Regularization of an integral curve on an arbitrary Noetherian ambient scheme
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a Noetherian scheme and let be an integral closed subscheme of dimension one whose normalization is finite. Then there exists a finite sequence of blowups in closed points such that the strict transform of in is a regular curve. If the closed points blown up in are chosen to be the images of the corresponding centers of the intrinsic sequence for , the strict transform of in is canonically the -th intrinsic blowup of .
Facts & Assumptions
The intrinsic regularization theorem: since is integral, Noetherian, one-dimensional and has finite normalization, there are a finite sequence of blowups at non-regular closed points and a factorization of the normalization through every stage, and is regular (Regularization of a one-dimensional integral curve with finite normalization by point blowups).
Strict transform under a blowup: if is a closed subscheme and is a blowup, the strict transform of is canonically the blowup of in the inverse image ideal of ; on charts it is cut out by the saturation of the pullback ideal. The construction may be iterated on the strict transform along a further blowup (Strict transforms of closed subschemes are blowups of the subscheme, Strict transform of a closed subscheme).
The blowup of a Noetherian scheme in a closed point is Noetherian: choose a finite affine open cover of the base by spectra of Noetherian rings (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes). The center ideal has finitely many generators on each chart, giving a finite standard affine chart cover of its blowup. Those chart rings are finitely generated algebras over Noetherian rings, hence Noetherian. The resulting finite affine cover makes the whole blowup Noetherian (Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps, Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring, Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf).
A closed point of a closed subscheme is a closed point of the ambient scheme, and the strict transform of an integral curve at each stage is an integral closed subscheme of the ambient scheme, of dimension one (Integral schemes, Strict transform of a closed subscheme).
The Axiom of Choice is assumed, inherited from the intrinsic sequence and the blowup suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Given: AC, a Noetherian scheme , an integral closed one-dimensional subscheme with finite normalization, and the intrinsic blowup sequence of [F1].
Apply [F1] to : this gives a finite sequence of closed points , with , each non-regular in , and regular. Since is integral of dimension one, each is a closed point of (Integral schemes).
Define the ambient sequence by and, inductively, , where is the image of under the closed immersion whose construction is the induction claim proved below. Each is a closed point of by [F4], and each is Noetherian by [F3].
Claim: for every the strict transform of in is canonically isomorphic over to ; in particular embeds in as a closed subscheme, so the induction of step 2.1 is legitimate. For this is the identity . Assume it for . The blowup is the blowup at the point ; by [F2] the strict transform of in is the blowup of in the inverse image ideal of , which is the maximal ideal of the point , and this blowup is . Since strict transforms may be iterated (the strict transform of in equals the strict transform of the strict transform of in , by the saturation description of [F2]), the strict transform of in is .
Taking , the strict transform of in is canonically , which is regular by step 1.1; hence the finite sequence of blowups in closed points constructed in step 2.1 has the required property, and by construction its centers are the images of the intrinsic centers, so the canonical identification of strict transforms with the intrinsic blowups holds at every stage. This proves both assertions.
Depends on
- Regularization of a one-dimensional integral curve with finite normalization by point blowups
- Strict transforms of closed subschemes are blowups of the subscheme
- Strict transform of a closed subscheme
- Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf
- The Axiom of Choice
- Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps
- Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring
- Integral schemes
- embedding dimension and regular local ring
- Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, tag 0BI5 (Lemma 54.15.2) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, tag 080E (Divisors, Lemma 31.34.2) (standard reference, not scraped)