Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regularization of a one-dimensional integral curve with finite normalization by point blowups

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let Y be an integral Noetherian scheme of dimension one whose normalization ν:Yν→Y is finite. Then there exists a finite sequence Yn⟶Yn−1⟶⋯⟶Y1⟶Y of blowups in closed points such that Yn is regular. Moreover the sequence may be chosen with every center a non-regular closed point of the preceding curve; then no blowup is an isomorphism, and the increasing sequence of coherent OY-subalgebras OY⊆f1,∗OY1⊆f2,∗OY2⊆⋯⊆ν∗OYν (with fi:Yi→Y the composite) strictly increases at every step, so that termination is exactly Noetherian stabilization of this sequence.

No claim is made about normalizations that are not finite, and no higher-dimensional resolution of singularities is asserted. If Y is already regular the sequence may be taken empty (n=0).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Step data for a point blowup of Yi−1: the blowup βi:Yi=Bl⁡pi−1Yi−1→Yi−1 in a closed point is finite, is an isomorphism if and only if OYi−1,pi−1 is regular, and the finite normalization of Yi−1 factors uniquely through it, so that Yν is a normalization of Yi and (βi)∗OYi lies between OYi−1 and νi−1,∗OYν (The blowup of a one-dimensional integral Noetherian scheme at a closed point is finite, The finite normalization of a curve factors through the blowup of a closed point).

[F2]

If the center is non-regular, the inclusion OYi−1⊊(βi)∗OYi is strict with nonzero quotient of finite length supported at the center (Blowing up a non-regular point strictly increases the finite normalization subalgebra).

[F3]

Integrality and Noetherianity are preserved: the blowup of an integral scheme in a nonzero ideal of finite type is integral (Blowing up a nonzero ideal on an integral scheme is birational), and the source of a finite morphism onto a Noetherian scheme is Noetherian, its affine charts being finitely generated algebras over Noetherian rings (Finite morphisms of schemes, Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring). The finite birational map has injective integral maps on affine coordinate domains, so dimension is preserved on an affine cover (Injective integral extensions preserve Krull dimension, Dimension can be computed on an open cover).

[F4]

Stabilization: on the Noetherian scheme Y, every increasing sequence of coherent subsheaves of the coherent module ν∗OYν stabilizes (Increasing sequences of coherent subsheaves of a coherent module on a Noetherian scheme stabilize, Coherent module sheaves).

[F5]

A one-dimensional integral Noetherian scheme is regular if and only if all of its closed points are regular: a local ring at a non-closed point of a one-dimensional integral scheme is a field, hence regular (Integral schemes, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention, embedding dimension and regular local ring).

[F6]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed for the choice of one non-regular closed point at each stage and for the cited suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

Given: AC, an integral Noetherian one-dimensional scheme Y with finite normalization ν:Yν→Y.

1.1F1F5given

(Base of the recursion) Put Y0=Y and f0=id⁡Y; then Y0 is integral, Noetherian and one-dimensional, ν:Yν→Y0 is a finite normalization and f0 is finite. We construct, as long as the current curve is not regular, a point blowup at a non-regular closed point and keep the data of [F1].

2.1F1F2F3F5step 1.1

(Existence of a suitable center) Suppose Yi−1 is not regular. By [F5] some closed point pi−1∈Yi−1 is not regular; choose it and let βi:Yi=Bl⁡pi−1Yi−1→Yi−1 be the blowup, with fi=fi−1∘βi. By [F1] the morphism βi is finite, is not an isomorphism (the center is non-regular), and Yν is a normalization of Yi; by [F3] the scheme Yi is integral, Noetherian and one-dimensional, and fi is finite. By [F2] the inclusion fi−1,∗OYi−1⊊fi,∗OYi is strict, both terms being coherent OY-subalgebras of ν∗OYν.

3.1F2F4step 2.1

(Termination) Suppose, for contradiction, that Yi−1 is non-regular for every i≥1. Then step 2.1 can be iterated for all i, and it produces the infinite strictly increasing sequence OY⊊f1,∗OY1⊊f2,∗OY2⊊⋯⊆ν∗OYν of coherent OY-submodules of the coherent module ν∗OYν over the Noetherian scheme Y. This contradicts stabilization [F4]. Hence there is an integer n≥0 with Yn regular.

4.1F6step 2.1step 3.1∎

(Conclusion) The finite sequence Yn→Yn−1→⋯→Y1→Y consists of blowups in closed points, each center non-regular in the preceding curve, and ends at the regular curve Yn; no morphism in it is an isomorphism by [F1], and the associated sequence of coherent subalgebras strictly increases at every step by [F2]. Conversely, stabilization of this sequence is precisely what forces the termination: a stabilized non-regular stage would admit one further strict increase, contradicting stabilization. This proves all assertions, including the empty sequence when Y is already regular. No assertion is made for non-finite normalizations or in dimension greater than one.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

88 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources