Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A node is resolved by one point blowup

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) and let k be a field of characteristic different from 2. The nodal plane curve Z=V(y2−x2(x+1)) in S=Ak2 is a reduced curve whose only singular point is the origin, with two regular formal branches having distinct tangent directions and formal intersection multiplicity 1; Z has finite normalization because it is of finite type over k. Blowing up S at the origin once gives a regular surface S1 with exceptional curve E isomorphic to Pk1 (Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional curves at two-dimensional local rings) whose intersections with the strict transform Z′ are the two distinct points of E corresponding to the two tangent directions of the branches, each with multiplicity mq(Z′∩E)=1 (Intersection multiplicity of closed subschemes at a point); the strict transform Z′ is a regular curve and is the normalization of Z. Thus a single point blowup already produces a strict normal crossings support (Strict normal crossings divisor on a regular surface), and one blowup supplies the conclusion of Embedded strict-normal-crossings resolution of a reduced curve on a regular surface. The exceptional contacts are computed directly below; the regular-source hypothesis of A point blowup drops pairwise intersection multiplicity by at least one does not hold for the original singular curve at the origin.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a field k of characteristic different from 2, the curve Z=V(f)⊆S=Ak2 with f=y2−x2(x+1)=y2−x3−x2, and the blowup π:S1→S of the origin.

[F1]

Blowups of a regular surface at a closed point stay regular, and the exceptional curve is regular, isomorphic to Pk1 over k when the center is a k-rational point with two-dimensional local ring (Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional curves at two-dimensional local rings).

[F2]

The normalization of Z is finite and unique up to a unique Z-isomorphism (Normalization of a reduced curve is finite). For the node the morphism ν:Ak1→Z, t↦(t2−1,t(t2−1)), is finite, because k[t] is generated as a module over the image subalgebra k[t2−1,t(t2−1)] by 1 and t, and it is birational, because t=t(t2−1)/(t2−1) lies in the fraction field of that subalgebra; its source Ak1 is normal, since k[t] is a unique factorization domain and hence an integrally closed domain (For every field F, F[x] is a unique factorisation domain, normal noetherian ring). By uniqueness it is therefore the normalization of Z, and over a field of characteristic different from 2 it is not injective over the origin, since t=1 and t=−1 both map to (0,0).

[F3]

Strict normal crossings: a reduced curve on a regular surface is SNC if at every closed point of its support either one regular component passes, or exactly two regular components pass and meet with mp=1 (Strict normal crossings divisor on a regular surface).

Verification

1.1F2givenalgebra

The parametrization of [F2] identifies R=k[x,y]/(y2−x2(x+1)) with k[t2−1,t(t2−1)]. Indeed every polynomial reduces uniquely to a(x)+yb(x), and its image a(t2−1)+t(t2−1)b(t2−1) is zero only when both polynomials vanish: the first term has even powers of t, the second odd powers, and k[t] is a domain. Thus R is a domain, finite integral over k[x], and has dimension one by Injective integral extensions preserve Krull dimension. At the origin the local maximal ideal has the independent classes of x,y modulo its square, since the defining equation has no linear term; the embedding dimension is two, so this closed point of the integral curve is not regular. Elsewhere x is invertible, because x=0 on the curve forces y=0; putting t=y/x gives R[1/x]=k[t,1/(t2−1)], a localization of the regular affine line (localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings). Therefore the origin is the unique singular point over every field of characteristic different from two, including characteristic three.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

The completed ambient local ring is the ring of formal power series in x,y: compatible residues modulo (x,y)n specify its coefficients, and denominators with nonzero constant term are inverted by formal geometric series. Construct the formal power series u=1+∑n≥1anxn recursively by u2=1+x. The coefficient equation gives a1=1/2, and for each n>1 determines an by 2an+∑1≤i<naian−i=0, so only powers of two need to be inverted. Thus this construction works in every allowed characteristic. In the ring of formal power series in x and y, the equation factors as (y−xu)(y+xu). Each factor has nonzero linear term y−x or y+x, and its quotient is the formal power-series ring in x, a DVR with uniformizer x; thus it defines a regular formal branch; their ideal together is (x,y) because two and u are units. Hence the branches have distinct tangent directions and intersection length one. They are formal branches of the single integral global curve established in step 1.1.

3.1givenstep 2.1algebra

On the x-chart y=xt, the exceptional curve is E=V(x) and the strict transform is V(t2−x−1), a regular curve with parameter t. Its exceptional intersection is V(x,t2−1), the two reduced points t=1,−1 because two is invertible; each has intersection length one. On the other chart x=ys, the strict-transform equation is 1−s2−ys3=0. It makes s invertible, since s2(1+ys)=1, so this entire portion belongs to the overlap with the x-chart, where t=1/s. Thus the x-chart describes the entire strict transform, including all points above the origin, and its two transverse exceptional contacts are precisely the two formal tangent directions of step 2.1.

4.1F2step 1.1step 3.1algebra

The strict transform is Ak1 with x=t2−1 and y=t(t2−1), so its map to Z is the finite birational map of [F2]. The normality invoked there follows directly from the UFD assertion: for an integral reduced fraction a/b, a monic equation implies b∣an after clearing denominators, and coprimality forces b to be a unit. Hence the map is the normalization. The original curve has multiplicity two at the origin, from its lowest-degree term y2−x2; the strict transform is regular and has curve multiplicity one at each of the two points above the origin. The contact calculation of step 3.1 is direct and does not apply the regular-source multiplicity lemma to the singular original curve or to nonexistent global branch components.

5.1F3step 3.1step 4.1∎

By [F1] the surface S1 is regular and E is a regular curve. The support of the total transform of Z is Z′∪E: two regular curves meeting exactly in the two points of step 3.1, each with multiplicity 1. At every closed point at most two components pass, and when two pass they meet transversally, so by [F3] the support is a strict normal crossings divisor; therefore the resolution sequence of Embedded strict-normal-crossings resolution of a reduced curve on a regular surface terminates after this single blowup, and no further blowups are needed.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

111 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources