How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Normalization of a reduced curve is finite
Statement
Let be a field and let be a reduced -scheme of finite type, of pure dimension one (for example a reduced projective plane curve or an open subscheme of one). Then there exists a finite morphism with the following properties:
- is regular of dimension one (equivalently normal: all local rings are discrete valuation rings or fields);
- is an isomorphism over the regular locus of and is birational on each irreducible component;
- on an affine chart of , is the morphism corresponding to the integral closure of in its total ring of fractions;
- is unique up to a unique -isomorphism, and is a coherent -module.
No separability or perfectness hypothesis on is needed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field and a reduced finite-type -scheme of pure dimension one. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the finiteness suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).
A finite-type domain over a field has finite normalization: The integral closure of a finite-type domain over any field in its fraction field is a finite module. No perfectness or separability assumption is required.
The integral closure of a domain in a field extension is integrally closed, A domain is integrally closed if and only if its prime localisations are, equivalently if and only if its maximal localisations are, and A module-finite algebra over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring, and so is every ring between the two: An integral closure in a field is an integrally closed domain; its localizations are integrally closed; a module-finite algebra over a Noetherian ring is Noetherian.
Finite normalization commutes with principal localization: If is the integral closure of a domain in its fraction field, then is the integral closure of in that field, and finiteness is preserved.
Function field of an integral finite-type scheme: Every nonempty affine open of an integral finite-type scheme has fraction field equal to its generic stalk. This does not require separatedness.
Every point of a Zariski-open set has a distinguished-open neighbourhood inside it, Gluing affine schemes along compatible open isomorphisms, and Morphisms of schemes are local on compatible open covers: Distinguished opens refine neighborhoods in affine schemes; schemes can be glued along open isomorphisms satisfying the cocycle condition, and morphisms agreeing on overlaps glue.
Every algebra of finite type over a principal ideal domain is a Noetherian ring, A Noetherian ring has finitely many minimal prime ideals, Irreducible components of the spectrum correspond to minimal prime ideals, and The reduced quotient by the nilradical: Finite-type algebras over fields are Noetherian. A Noetherian scheme has finitely many irreducible components, and the minimal primes of a reduced Noetherian ring have zero intersection.
The reduction of a scheme and Integral schemes: Each irreducible component with its reduced structure is integral.
total ring of fractions: is the localization of at its nonzerodivisors; for a domain it is its fraction field.
Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains: Integral closure consists of elements satisfying monic equations, and a domain is integrally closed if all such elements in its fraction field belong to it.
Finite morphisms of schemes and Finite is affine and local on its target: A finite morphism is affine with module-finite coordinate algebras on affine target opens; module-finiteness on an affine open cover implies finiteness.
Injective integral extensions preserve Krull dimension and Dimension can be computed on an open cover: An injective integral ring extension preserves dimension, and the dimension of a Noetherian space is the supremum of the dimensions of an open cover.
normal noetherian ring, Height-one localizations of normal Noetherian domains are DVRs, and one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs, and Equivalent characterizations of a DVR: A normal Noetherian domain has DVR localizations at height-one primes; its zero-dimensional localizations are fields. A one-dimensional Noetherian local ring is regular exactly when it is a DVR, and a DVR is integrally closed.
Quasi-coherent module on a scheme and Coherent module sheaves: An affine direct image of the structure sheaf is quasi-coherent; on a locally Noetherian scheme a finite-type quasi-coherent module is coherent.
Proof
Since is quasi-compact and its affine coordinate rings are Noetherian, it is Noetherian. Its finitely many reduced irreducible components are integral finite-type curves of dimension one. Choose a finite affine cover of each component and identify all their fraction fields with its generic field . Let be the integral closure of in . These are finite Noetherian normal domains.
The schemes glue over , even if is nonseparated. Here are the overlap identifications explicitly. For a point in choose distinguished neighborhoods and contained in that intersection. On write , and on write . Their common intersection is the distinguished open in and in ; both coordinate rings are the same subring of , since they are the sections of the same open subscheme. Their integral closures are therefore the same subring of , namely . These common distinguished opens cover the overlap. Their identities glue, and the triple-overlap identities satisfy the cocycle condition because all are identities inside . Thus scheme and morphism gluing produce an integral normal scheme and a morphism , with inverse image of equal to . It is finite by the affine-cover criterion. Its generic field is , and its dimension is one by integral dimension preservation on the affine cover.
Set and compose each with the reduced closed immersion to obtain . This is finite: closed immersions are finite on affine charts by the quotient-ring description; composition is module-finite, and a finite disjoint union is module-finite. Empty affine opens have empty inverse image, with coordinate algebra zero; the following computation concerns nonempty affine opens. More explicitly, on any affine , let be its minimal primes and . The corresponding component inverse images are affine with finite coordinate domains lying in , normal and birational over . Consequently is its integral closure : every element of is integral over , and every element of the fraction field integral over is also integral over , hence belongs to . Therefore where . Each factor has finitely many -module generators; placing these in their separate coordinates gives finitely many -module generators of . This uses no Chinese-remainder decomposition of .
We identify correctly. Distinct minimal primes are incomparable. For each choose for and put ; for one minimal prime put . Its image is nonzero in and zero in every other . An element is a nonzerodivisor exactly when its image is nonzero in every : the forward implication follows since otherwise with , and the reverse follows from the injection . Hence localization gives an injection . For any tuple in this product, choose lifts of , and set and . The image of in is the nonzero product , so is a nonzerodivisor, and has the prescribed tuple of images. This proves surjectivity.
Each is normal Noetherian of dimension one. All its local rings are therefore fields or DVRs, hence regular. Their disjoint union is regular of dimension one. The generic-field identifications give birationality on each component, meaning the restriction from the corresponding normalized component, not a claim that scheme-theoretic base change over removes the other branches.
The affine description gives a finite module on each affine target chart. Thus is quasi-coherent of finite type, hence coherent on the locally Noetherian scheme .
Under that identification is the integral closure of in . Since is module-finite over , every satisfies a monic equation over : multiplication by on a finite generating family and the determinant trick give a monic polynomial annihilating , hence annihilating . Conversely a tuple integral over has its th coordinate integral over , so that coordinate belongs to . This proves precisely the affine description in part (3).
At a regular point of , its local ring is a field (in dimension zero its maximal ideal has zero cotangent space and hence is zero by Nakayama) or a DVR, hence an integrally closed domain. Thus only one component passes through . Remove the other finitely many closed components to obtain a neighborhood with integral coordinate rings. For an affine neighborhood therein, localization of its integral closure at the prime of equals . Indeed any element integral over has an equation with finitely many denominators outside that prime; clearing these denominators after multiplying the element by their product shows it belongs to a localization of the integral closure of . The reverse inclusion is immediate. As is a finite module, its zero stalk at implies it vanishes on a distinguished neighborhood of (annihilate each of finitely many generators with an element outside the prime). On that neighborhood , so is an isomorphism. These neighborhoods cover the regular locus.
Any other morphism with the stated properties has, by part (3), the same integral-closure algebra on each affine target chart. These canonical identifications commute with restriction: they are the same identifications inside the component function fields used in step 2.1. They therefore glue to a -isomorphism. It is unique: an -algebra automorphism of localizes to an automorphism of fixing , hence fixing every fraction . Here localization of at the nonzerodivisors of equals , since . Since embeds in , that automorphism is already the identity on . This proves part (4).
Remarks
Normalization separates the reduced irreducible components rather than gluing their normalizations along intersection points. The overlap construction above does not assume separatedness. The field-finiteness theorem [F1] applies to arbitrary fields, including imperfect fields, and regularity here means regularity of the local rings, not smoothness over .
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Coherent module sheaves
- Finite morphisms of schemes
- Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains
- Integral schemes
- normal noetherian ring
- Quasi-coherent module on a scheme
- The reduction of a scheme
- total ring of fractions
- Every algebra of finite type over a principal ideal domain is a Noetherian ring
- The reduced quotient by the nilradical
- Injective integral extensions preserve Krull dimension
- Dimension can be computed on an open cover
- Every point of a Zariski-open set has a distinguished-open neighbourhood inside it
- Finite is affine and local on its target
- Finite normalization commutes with principal localization
- Function field of an integral finite-type scheme
- Morphisms of schemes are local on compatible open covers
- Equivalent characterizations of a DVR
- Gluing affine schemes along compatible open isomorphisms
- Height-one localizations of normal Noetherian domains are DVRs
- A finite-type domain over a field has finite normalization
- The integral closure of a domain in a field extension is integrally closed
- Irreducible components of the spectrum correspond to minimal prime ideals
- A module-finite algebra over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring, and so is every ring between the two
- A Noetherian ring has finitely many minimal prime ideals
- A domain is integrally closed if and only if its prime localisations are, equivalently if and only if its maximal localisations are
- one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs
Used by
- Finite normalization alone does not make a curve regular Counterexample
- Normalization and blowup are different operations Counterexample
- Normalization defect delta of a reduced curve Definition
- A cusp: one blowup, the normalization and the delta drop Example
- A node is resolved by one point blowup Example
- Normalization is unchanged under finite birational maps of reduced curves Lemma
- The finite normalization of a curve factors through the blowup of a closed point Lemma
- The normalization defect is an Euler characteristic and a weighted sum of local lengths Lemma
- Resolution of reduced plane curves by point blowups and the delta recurrence Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
131 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry v6.10 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, June 27, 2011 draft (author-hosted 'Early (out-of-date) version of The Rising Sea') (standard reference, not scraped)