Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normalization of a reduced curve is finite

Statement

Let k be a field and let C be a reduced k-scheme of finite type, of pure dimension one (for example a reduced projective plane curve or an open subscheme of one). Then there exists a finite morphism ν ⁣:Cnu→C with the following properties:

  1. Cnu is regular of dimension one (equivalently normal: all local rings are discrete valuation rings or fields);
  2. ν is an isomorphism over the regular locus of C and is birational on each irreducible component;
  3. on an affine chart Spec⁡A of C, ν is the morphism corresponding to the integral closure of A in its total ring of fractions;
  4. ν is unique up to a unique C-isomorphism, and ν∗OCnu is a coherent OC-module.

No separability or perfectness hypothesis on k is needed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k and a reduced finite-type k-scheme C of pure dimension one. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the finiteness suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

A finite-type domain over a field has finite normalization: The integral closure of a finite-type domain over any field in its fraction field is a finite module. No perfectness or separability assumption is required.

[F3]

Finite normalization commutes with principal localization: If B is the integral closure of a domain A in its fraction field, then Bf is the integral closure of Af in that field, and finiteness is preserved.

[F4]

Function field of an integral finite-type scheme: Every nonempty affine open of an integral finite-type scheme has fraction field equal to its generic stalk. This does not require separatedness.

[F5]

Every point of a Zariski-open set has a distinguished-open neighbourhood inside it, Gluing affine schemes along compatible open isomorphisms, and Morphisms of schemes are local on compatible open covers: Distinguished opens refine neighborhoods in affine schemes; schemes can be glued along open isomorphisms satisfying the cocycle condition, and morphisms agreeing on overlaps glue.

[F6]

Every algebra of finite type over a principal ideal domain is a Noetherian ring, A Noetherian ring has finitely many minimal prime ideals, Irreducible components of the spectrum correspond to minimal prime ideals, and The reduced quotient by the nilradical: Finite-type algebras over fields are Noetherian. A Noetherian scheme has finitely many irreducible components, and the minimal primes of a reduced Noetherian ring have zero intersection.

[F7]

The reduction of a scheme and Integral schemes: Each irreducible component with its reduced structure is integral.

[F8]

total ring of fractions: Q(A) is the localization of A at its nonzerodivisors; for a domain it is its fraction field.

[F9]

Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains: Integral closure consists of elements satisfying monic equations, and a domain is integrally closed if all such elements in its fraction field belong to it.

[F10]

Finite morphisms of schemes and Finite is affine and local on its target: A finite morphism is affine with module-finite coordinate algebras on affine target opens; module-finiteness on an affine open cover implies finiteness.

[F11]

Injective integral extensions preserve Krull dimension and Dimension can be computed on an open cover: An injective integral ring extension preserves dimension, and the dimension of a Noetherian space is the supremum of the dimensions of an open cover.

[F12]

normal noetherian ring, Height-one localizations of normal Noetherian domains are DVRs, and one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs, and Equivalent characterizations of a DVR: A normal Noetherian domain has DVR localizations at height-one primes; its zero-dimensional localizations are fields. A one-dimensional Noetherian local ring is regular exactly when it is a DVR, and a DVR is integrally closed.

[F13]

Quasi-coherent module on a scheme and Coherent module sheaves: An affine direct image of the structure sheaf is quasi-coherent; on a locally Noetherian scheme a finite-type quasi-coherent module is coherent.

Proof

1.1F1F2F4F6F7

Since C is quasi-compact and its affine coordinate rings are Noetherian, it is Noetherian. Its finitely many reduced irreducible components Ci are integral finite-type curves of dimension one. Choose a finite affine cover Uij=Spec⁡Aij of each component and identify all their fraction fields with its generic field Ki. Let Bij be the integral closure of Aij in Ki. These are finite Noetherian normal domains.

2.1F2F3F5F10F11step 1.1

The schemes Spec⁡Bij glue over Ci, even if Ci is nonseparated. Here are the overlap identifications explicitly. For a point in Uij∩Uil choose distinguished neighborhoods D(f)⊂Uij and D(g)⊂Uil contained in that intersection. On D(f) write g=c/fr, and on D(g) write f=d/gs. Their common intersection is the distinguished open D(fc) in Uij and D(gd) in Uil; both coordinate rings are the same subring of Ki, since they are the sections of the same open subscheme. Their integral closures are therefore the same subring of Ki, namely (Bij)fc=(Bil)gd. These common distinguished opens cover the overlap. Their identities glue, and the triple-overlap identities satisfy the cocycle condition because all are identities inside Ki. Thus scheme and morphism gluing produce an integral normal scheme Cinu and a morphism νi:Cinu→Ci, with inverse image of Uij equal to Spec⁡Bij. It is finite by the affine-cover criterion. Its generic field is Ki, and its dimension is one by integral dimension preservation on the affine cover.

3.1F1F2F6F9F10step 2.1

Set Cnu=⨆iCinu and compose each νi with the reduced closed immersion Ci↪C to obtain ν. This is finite: closed immersions are finite on affine charts by the quotient-ring description; composition is module-finite, and a finite disjoint union is module-finite. Empty affine opens have empty inverse image, with coordinate algebra zero; the following computation concerns nonempty affine opens. More explicitly, on any affine U=Spec⁡A⊂C, let p1,…,pm be its minimal primes and Ai=A/pi. The corresponding component inverse images are affine with finite coordinate domains Di lying in Frac⁡(Ai), normal and birational over Ai. Consequently Di is its integral closure Bi: every element of Di is integral over Ai, and every element of the fraction field integral over Ai is also integral over Di, hence belongs to Di. Therefore ν−1(U)=Spec⁡B where B=∏iBi. Each factor has finitely many Ai-module generators; placing these in their separate coordinates gives finitely many A-module generators of B. This uses no Chinese-remainder decomposition of A.

4.1F6F8step 3.1

We identify Q(A) correctly. Distinct minimal primes are incomparable. For each i choose aij∈pj∖pi for j≠i and put gi=∏j≠iaij; for one minimal prime put g1=1. Its image is nonzero in Ai and zero in every other Aj. An element s∈A is a nonzerodivisor exactly when its image is nonzero in every Ai: the forward implication follows since otherwise sgi=0 with gi≠0, and the reverse follows from the injection A↪∏iAi. Hence localization gives an injection Q(A)↪∏iFrac⁡(Ai). For any tuple ui/vi in this product, choose lifts ai,bi∈A of ui,vi, and set a=∑igiai and s=∑igibi. The image of s in Ai is the nonzero product givi, so s is a nonzerodivisor, and a/s has the prescribed tuple of images. This proves surjectivity.

4.2F11F12step 2.1step 3.1

Each Cinu is normal Noetherian of dimension one. All its local rings are therefore fields or DVRs, hence regular. Their disjoint union is regular of dimension one. The generic-field identifications give birationality on each component, meaning the restriction from the corresponding normalized component, not a claim that scheme-theoretic base change over Ci removes the other branches.

4.3F13step 3.1

The affine description gives a finite module B on each affine target chart. Thus ν∗OCnu is quasi-coherent of finite type, hence coherent on the locally Noetherian scheme C.

5.1F9step 3.1step 4.1

Under that identification B=∏iBi is the integral closure of A in Q(A). Since B is module-finite over A, every b∈B satisfies a monic equation over A: multiplication by b on a finite generating family and the determinant trick give a monic polynomial annihilating B, hence annihilating 1. Conversely a tuple integral over A has its ith coordinate integral over Ai, so that coordinate belongs to Bi. This proves precisely the affine description in part (3).

6.1F3F6F9F12step 3.1step 5.1

At a regular point x of C, its local ring is a field (in dimension zero its maximal ideal has zero cotangent space and hence is zero by Nakayama) or a DVR, hence an integrally closed domain. Thus only one component passes through x. Remove the other finitely many closed components to obtain a neighborhood with integral coordinate rings. For an affine neighborhood Spec⁡A therein, localization of its integral closure at the prime of x equals Ax. Indeed any element integral over Ax has an equation with finitely many denominators outside that prime; clearing these denominators after multiplying the element by their product shows it belongs to a localization of the integral closure of A. The reverse inclusion is immediate. As B/A is a finite module, its zero stalk at x implies it vanishes on a distinguished neighborhood of x (annihilate each of finitely many generators with an element outside the prime). On that neighborhood A=B, so ν is an isomorphism. These neighborhoods cover the regular locus.

7.1F5F8step 2.1step 5.1step 4.3∎

Any other morphism with the stated properties has, by part (3), the same integral-closure algebra B⊂Q(A) on each affine target chart. These canonical identifications commute with restriction: they are the same identifications inside the component function fields used in step 2.1. They therefore glue to a C-isomorphism. It is unique: an A-algebra automorphism of B localizes to an automorphism of Q(A) fixing A, hence fixing every fraction a/s. Here localization of B at the nonzerodivisors of A equals Q(A), since A⊂B⊂Q(A). Since B embeds in Q(A), that automorphism is already the identity on B. This proves part (4).

Remarks

Normalization separates the reduced irreducible components rather than gluing their normalizations along intersection points. The overlap construction above does not assume separatedness. The field-finiteness theorem [F1] applies to arbitrary fields, including imperfect fields, and regularity here means regularity of the local rings, not smoothness over k.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

131 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources