Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The normalization defect is an Euler characteristic and a weighted sum of local lengths

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field, let C be a reduced proper curve over k with normalization ν ⁣:C~→C and defect sheaf QC. Then: (1) Hq(C,QC)=0 for q≥1, so δk(C)=χk(C,QC)=χk(OC~)−χk(OC) (using additivity of the Euler characteristic in the normalization sequence 0→OC→ν∗OC~→QC→0 and χ(C,ν∗O)=χ(C~,O)); (2) δk(C)=∑ over closed points p of [κ(p):k] times the length of QC,p over OC,p, a finite sum over the finite non-normal locus; (3) δk(C)≥0, and δk(C)=0 if and only if C is regular, in which case the irreducible components of C are disjoint and normal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, a reduced proper curve C over k (reduced in the sense of (The reduction of a scheme), pure dimension one), its finite normalization ν ⁣:C~→C of (Normalization of a reduced curve is finite), the defect sheaf QC=coker⁡(OC→ν∗OC~) and the defect δk(C)=dim⁡kH0(C,QC) of (Normalization defect delta of a reduced curve).

[F1]

Normalization defect delta of a reduced curve: QC=coker⁡(OC→ν∗OC~) is a coherent OC-module supported on the finite non-normal locus, δk(C)=dim⁡kH0(C,QC), and H0(C,QC) is the direct sum of the finitely many stalk contributions QC,p over the support.

[F2]

Normalization of a reduced curve is finite: ν ⁣:C~→C is finite, C~ is regular of dimension one, on an affine chart ν corresponds to the inclusion of A into its integral closure in the total ring of fractions, ν is unique up to a unique C-isomorphism, and ν∗OC~ is coherent.

[F3]

Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences: For a short exact sequence 0→F′→F→F′′→0 of coherent sheaves on a scheme proper over k, χ(X,F)=χ(X,F′)+χ(X,F′′).

[F4]

Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf: For X proper over k and F coherent, χ(X,F)=∑q≥0(−1)qdim⁡kHq(X,F) is a finite alternating sum of finite k-dimensions.

[F5]

Affine pushforward is compatible with sheaf cohomology: For an affine morphism f ⁣:X→S and a quasi-coherent OX-module F, the natural maps Hq(S,f∗F)→Hq(X,F) are isomorphisms for all q≥0.

[F6]

Composition series and length of a module: A composition series of a module is a finite chain with simple successive factors; the length ℓR(M) is the number of factors, is independent of the series, and the zero module has length 0.

[F7]

Module length is additive in short exact sequences: For a short exact sequence 0→N→M→Q→0, M has finite length if and only if N and Q do, and then ℓR(M)=ℓR(N)+ℓR(Q).

[F8]

A skyscraper sheaf of abelian groups at a point, Flasque sheaf and Flasque abelian sheaves are Γ-acyclic: A skyscraper sheaf ix,∗A on a topological space X is flasque, because its restriction maps are either identities or zero maps; hence, under the Axiom of Choice inherited from that acyclicity theorem, Hq(X,ix,∗A)=0 for every q>0.

[F9]

one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs: A nonzero Noetherian local ring of dimension one is regular if and only if it is a discrete valuation ring; fields are excluded from the term DVR.

[F10]

Valuation rings are integrally closed: Every valuation ring is an integrally closed domain; in particular every discrete valuation ring is an integrally closed domain.

[F11]

normal noetherian ring: A commutative Noetherian ring is normal if every prime localization is an integrally closed domain.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3

The normalization sequence 0→OC→ν∗OC~→QC→0 is short exact: QC is the cokernel by definition [F1], and OC→ν∗OC~ is injective because on an affine chart it is the inclusion of A into its integral closure in the total ring of fractions [F2]. All three terms are coherent (OC, ν∗OC~ by [F2], and QC by [F1]), so the sequence satisfies the hypotheses of [F3].

1.2F2F4F5

One has χ(C,ν∗OC~)=χ(C~,OC~): the finite morphism ν is affine by [F2] and its inverse image of an affine open is affine, so [F5] identifies Hq(C,ν∗OC~) with Hq(C~,OC~) for every q≥0, and the two alternating sums of [F4] agree.

1.3F1F8

Let F be the finite closed support of QC. The germ maps define a sheaf map QC→⨁p∈Fip,∗QC,p, where each summand is the skyscraper of the underlying abelian group. It is an isomorphism on stalks: at p∈F its p-component is the identity and the other summands have zero stalk since their points are closed; outside F both stalks are zero. Hence it is an isomorphism of abelian sheaves. A finite sum of skyscrapers is flasque, because every restriction is a direct sum of identities and maps onto zero. Flasque acyclicity proves Hq(C,QC)=0 for q≥1 and also proves directly the degree-zero stalk sum used below.

2.1F3F4step 1.2step 1.3

Consequently δk(C)=dim⁡kH0(C,QC)=χ(C,QC) by [F4], and applying [F3] to the sequence of step 1.1 gives χ(C,ν∗OC~)=χ(C,OC)+χ(C,QC), so the two identities combined with step 1.2 yield δk(C)=χ(C~,OC~)−χ(C,OC); this proves (1).

3.1F1F6F7step 2.1

For the length formula of (2): by [F1], H0(C,QC) is the direct sum of the stalks QC,p over the finite non-normal locus, and each QC,p has finite length over the Noetherian local ring OC,p; fixing a composition series [F6] with successive quotients κ(p) and using additivity of k-dimension in short exact sequences together with [F7], one gets dim⁡kQC,p=ℓOC,p(QC,p)⋅[κ(p):k]. Summing gives δk(C)=∑p[κ(p):k] ℓOC,p(QC,p) over the closed points of the finite non-normal locus.

4.1F2F9F10F11step 3.1∎

For (3): the sum in step 3.1 has nonnegative terms, so δk(C)≥0; if δk(C)=0 then every local length vanishes, hence QC=0 and the injective map OC→ν∗OC~ of step 1.1 is an isomorphism, so the affine morphism ν is an isomorphism and C≅C~ is regular of dimension one by [F2]. Conversely, if C is regular, then each one-dimensional local ring OC,p is a discrete valuation ring by [F9], hence an integrally closed domain by [F10], and the zero-dimensional stalks are fields, so C is normal in the sense of [F11]; the identity C→C is then a finite morphism from a normal curve that is an isomorphism over the regular locus, so the uniqueness clause of [F2] makes the normalization isomorphic to the identity over C, whence QC=0 and δk(C)=0. Finally, in the regular case every local ring is a discrete valuation ring or a field, hence a domain, so each point of C lies in a unique irreducible component and distinct components are disjoint; a component, having everywhere the local ring of C, is itself regular and hence normal.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

103 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources