How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Height-one localizations of normal Noetherian domains are DVRs
Statement
Let be a Noetherian integrally closed domain, and let be a prime ideal of height . Then the localisation is a discrete valuation ring.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Noetherian integrally closed domain and a height-one prime ideal .
The height of is (The height of a prime ideal).
Localisation at a prime means inverting (Localisation at a prime ideal: ).
The ring is local with maximal ideal ( is local with unique maximal ideal ).
A domain is integrally closed when every element of its fraction field integral over it already lies in the domain (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains).
Localisations of Noetherian rings are Noetherian (Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian).
A nonfield domain is a DVR exactly when it is a one-dimensional Noetherian local integrally closed domain (Equivalent characterizations of a DVR).
Proof
By [L1] and [L3], the ring is a Noetherian local domain. By [F1], its Krull dimension is .
The localisation remains integrally closed. Let lie in the fraction field of and be integral over . Write a monic equation with each . Put . Then is integral over , so [F3] gives . Since , we conclude . Thus is integrally closed.
The maximal ideal of is nonzero. Choose . If in , then some satisfies , impossible in the domain . Hence is nonzero, so is not a field.
Steps 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 verify condition 3 of [L4] for the ring . Therefore is a discrete valuation ring.
Depends on
- The height of a prime ideal
- Localisation at a prime ideal: $R_{\mathfrak p}=(R\setminus\mathfrak p)^{-1}R$
- $R_{\mathfrak p}$ is local with unique maximal ideal $\mathfrak pR_{\mathfrak p}$
- Prime ideals of a localization are exactly the primes disjoint from the denominator set
- Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains
- Left and right Noetherian rings
- Equivalent characterizations of a DVR
- Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Theorem (23.10) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Proposition 20.5 and Corollary 20.6 (standard reference, not scraped)