Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Principal divisors on a normal proper curve have degree zero

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), hence also the Axiom of Dependent Choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain). Let k be a field and let C be a normal proper curve over k (Degree divisor proper curve), with function field K=k(C). Then for every f∈K× the principal Weil divisor div⁡W(f)=∑Zord⁡Z(f) [Z] of Principal weil divisor and class group is a finite integral combination of closed points of C, and its k-degree (Degree divisor proper curve) vanishes: deg⁡kdiv⁡W(f)=∑x∈C closedord⁡x(f) [κ(x):k]=0. The order ord⁡x(f) is the normalized valuation of f in the discrete valuation ring OC,x (Order codimension one rational function). No smoothness, projectivity or separability hypothesis is imposed, and f may be constant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, a normal proper curve C over k with generic point η and function field K=OC,η=k(C), the Axiom of Choice, and an element f∈K×.

[F1]

C is an integral, proper, one-dimensional k-scheme of finite type over k, hence Noetherian; it is a normal locally Noetherian integral scheme. Its prime divisors are exactly its closed points, and for every closed point x the local ring OC,x is a discrete valuation ring with fraction field K, whose normalized valuation at f is ord⁡x(f); in particular ord⁡x(f)=0 if and only if f is a unit of OC,x. The residue field κ(x) is finite over k (Degree divisor proper curve, Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme, Order codimension one rational function, Height-one localizations of normal Noetherian domains are DVRs).

[F2]

The principal Weil divisor div⁡W(f)=∑Zord⁡Z(f)[Z], summed over the prime divisors Z of C, is a well-defined element of the free abelian group Div⁡(C) generated by the prime divisors, and on the integral curve C it is the finite sum ∑xord⁡x(f)[x] over the closed points x; its k-degree is computed coefficientwise as ∑xord⁡x(f)[κ(x):k], which is a finite sum with values in Z (Principal weil divisor and class group, Degree divisor proper curve).

[F3]

The Axiom of Choice implies the Axiom of Dependent Choice, and the finiteness statement just used by [F2] is proved from Dependent Choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice, The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain).

[F4]

If f is algebraic over k, then f and f−1 are global units of C, that is, f∈Γ(C,OC)× (Proper normal curve rational function map).

[F5]

If f is transcendental over k, then there is a finite locally free morphism φf:C→Pk1 of degree d=[K:k(f)] with φf#(t)=f on the standard chart t, and: the fibre φf−1(0) consists exactly of the closed points x with ord⁡x(f)>0, the fibre φf−1(∞) consists exactly of the closed points x with ord⁡x(f)<0, and ∑φf(x)=0ord⁡x(f) [κ(x):k]=d,∑φf(x)=∞(−ord⁡x(f))[κ(x):k]=d. Both sums are finite and every summand is a positive integer (Proper normal curve rational function map, Fibre degree of the finite locally free map to the projective line).

Proof

1.1F1F2F4

Algebraic case. Suppose that f is algebraic over k. By [F4] both f and f−1 are global units of C, so the germ of f in each local ring OC,x is a unit; by [F1] ord⁡x(f)=0 at every closed point x of C. Hence every coefficient of div⁡W(f) vanishes, so div⁡W(f)=0 and the degree sum of [F2] is empty, giving deg⁡kdiv⁡W(f)=0.

1.2F1F2F5

Transcendental case: the coefficient partition. Suppose that f is transcendental over k, and let S+={ x closed:ord⁡x(f)>0 }, S−={ x closed:ord⁡x(f)<0 } and S0={ x closed:ord⁡x(f)=0 }. By [F5] the set S+ is the zero fibre of φf and S− is the fibre over infinity, so both are finite; the three sets are pairwise disjoint and, since ord⁡x(f) is an integer, they partition the set of closed points. The coefficient of x in div⁡W(f) is ord⁡x(f), which is 0 for x∈S0; therefore the degree sum of [F2] splits as deg⁡kdiv⁡W(f)=∑x∈S+ord⁡x(f)[κ(x):k]+∑x∈S−ord⁡x(f)[κ(x):k].

2.1F5step 1.2

Transcendental case: computation. Let d=[K:k(f)]. By the two identities of [F5] the first sum in step 1.2 equals d, while the second equals the negative of the pole-fibre sum, namely ∑x∈S−ord⁡x(f)[κ(x):k]=−d. Hence deg⁡kdiv⁡W(f)=d−d=0.

3.1F3step 1.1step 2.1∎

Conclusion. Every f∈K× is either algebraic or transcendental over k, so steps 1.1 and 2.1 cover all cases and deg⁡kdiv⁡W(f)=0 for every f∈K×. The Axiom of Choice is used exactly as declared: it supplies the finite locally free morphism φf and the fibre-degree identities of [F5], and through [F3] it supplies the Dependent Choice needed for the finiteness of div⁡W(f) in [F2]; the case distinction and the addition in steps 1.1–2.1 use no choice.

The constant function f=1 is algebraic over k, so it is covered by step 1.1: its divisor is the zero divisor and the degree sum is the empty sum 0. In the algebraic case of step 1.1 the divisor of f is the zero divisor, so the theorem also covers the situation in which div⁡W(f) has empty support. In the transcendental case d=[K:k(f)]≥1 is a positive integer, both fibres of [F5] are nonempty, and the divisor of f has both positive and negative coefficients, whose contributions cancel exactly. A single closed point is handled inside the same coefficientwise sum, without a separate case, and no smoothness or projectivity of C is assumed beyond the properness and normality needed by [F4] and [F5]; the target Pk1 is used only through its two standard charts. Finally, the hypotheses are exactly those of [F4] and [F5], so the theorem does not apply to non-normal curves, where orders at closed points may fail to be defined.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

90 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources