Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cartier divisors on a normal Noetherian scheme give Weil divisors

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain). Let X be a normal Noetherian scheme (Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme) and let D be a Cartier divisor on X (Cartier divisor), represented on an open cover by local equations fi∈KX(Ui)×. For every prime divisor Z⊆X with generic point ξ and every index i with ξ∈Ui, the germ fi,ξ∈KX,ξ is a unit and the value vξ(fi,ξ) of the normalized valuation of OX,ξ (Order codimension one rational function) is independent of i and of the chosen local-equation datum; the sum cyc⁡(D):=∑Zvξ(fi,ξ) [Z], taken over the prime divisors Z with generic point ξ and some index i with ξ∈Ui, is a well-defined Weil divisor on X (Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme). It is independent of the charts and equations used, and we call it the Weil divisor associated to D. If X is integral (Integral schemes), then cyc⁡(div⁡C(f))=div⁡W(f) for every f∈K(X)× (Principal cartier divisor, Principal weil divisor and class group).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A normal Noetherian scheme X, the Axiom of Dependent Choice, a Cartier divisor D on X with local-equation datum {(Ui,fi)}i∈I, and, in the local-finiteness argument, a point x∈X.

[F1]

A Cartier divisor is a global section of KX×/OX×; a local-equation datum {(Ui,fi)}i∈I has fi∈KX(Ui)× and fi/fj∈OX×(Ui∩Uj) for all i,j; every global section is locally represented by such a datum, and two data for the same divisor satisfy fi/gj∈OX×(Ui∩Vj) on overlaps (Cartier divisor).

[F2]

KX=aPX for the presheaf PX(U)=SX(U)−1OX(U), and a section of a sheafification is locally in the image of the sheafification map: every point of its open set has a smaller open neighbourhood on which the section is the image of a presheaf section (Sheaf total quotient rings, Sheafification of a presheaf, A sheaf on a topological space, The stalk of a presheaf at a point).

[F3]

For a prime divisor Z with generic point ξ, the local ring OX,ξ is a one-dimensional Noetherian integrally closed local domain: normality gives the domain and integral-closure properties, local Noetherianity gives Noetherianity, and the definition of prime divisor gives dimension one (Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes). It is therefore a discrete valuation ring by Equivalent characterizations of a DVR; its normalized valuation vξ takes values in Z on nonzero elements (Discrete valuation rings, Discrete valuations). Moreover, KX,ξ=Frac⁡(OX,ξ). To prove this locally, choose an affine chart V=Spec⁡A from the finite Noetherian cover in [F6] containing ξ, and let p⊆A correspond to ξ. Then OX,ξ=Ap is a domain (The stalk of the affine structure sheaf at a prime is A_p). The localization prime correspondence shows that exactly one minimal prime q of A is contained in p, since Ap is a domain (Prime ideals of a localization are exactly the primes disjoint from the denominator set). By [F10], list the finitely many other minimal primes of A as q1,…,qs. Each is not contained in p, so choose gj∈qj∖p and set g=∏j=1sgj, with g=1 if s=0. Then g∉p, and D(g) contains ξ while avoiding every other minimal-prime locus. The ring Ag is reduced and Noetherian: A is reduced by normality and Noetherian by [F6], and localization preserves reducedness and Noetherianity ([F8]). Every prime of Ag contracts to a prime r⊆A avoiding g. By the radical-ideal form of [F10] applied to (0) in A, some minimal prime of A lies in r; it cannot be any qj, since each contains g. Thus every prime of Ag contains qAg, and qAg is its unique minimal prime. Applying the same radical-ideal result to (0) in Ag gives (0)=qAg, so Ag is a domain and D(g) is an integral open. By [F2], on opens contained in D(g) the regular-section presheaf defining KX is the same as the presheaf for D(g), and sheafification commutes with restriction to this open. The integral-scheme clause of Sheaf total quotient rings therefore makes KX∣D(g) the constant sheaf with value K(D(g))=Frac⁡(Ag). Taking the stalk at ξ and using Frac⁡(Ag)=Frac⁡(Ap) proves the claim (The underlying space of an affine spectrum, Localisation at a prime ideal: Rp=(R∖p)−1R, The field of fractions Frac⁡(D)=(D∖{0})−1D of an integral domain, Sheafification of a presheaf, Integral schemes, Sheaf total quotient rings).

[F4]

The stalk of a presheaf of rings is a ring, and the germ maps KX(U)→KX,ξ are ring homomorphisms, so they carry units to units (The stalk of a presheaf at a point, Germs of sections, Presheaves and sheaves of groups, rings, and modules).

[F5]

A discrete valuation satisfies v(xy)=v(x)+v(y), v(x)=∞ exactly when x=0, and v(x)=0 exactly when x is a unit of its valuation ring; in particular v vanishes on the units of OX,ξ and is nonnegative on OX,ξ (Valuations on a field, Discrete valuation rings).

[F6]

X is Noetherian: it has a finite affine open cover by spectra of Noetherian rings, and it is locally Noetherian and quasi-compact (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes).

[F7]

In an affine chart Spec⁡A the basic opens D(b)=Spec⁡Ab form a basis of the topology (Affine schemes and their coordinate rings, The underlying space of an affine spectrum).

[F8]

Localizations and quotients of Noetherian rings are Noetherian (Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian).

[F9]

For a prime ideal p of A one has Ap=(A∖p)−1A with localization maps a↦a/1, and pAp∩A=p; the ring Ap is local with maximal ideal pAp (Localisation at a prime ideal: Rp=(R∖p)−1R, Multiplicative subsets and the localisation S−1R as equivalence classes of fractions, A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal).

[F10]

A Noetherian ring has only finitely many minimal prime ideals, and every radical ideal in a Noetherian ring is the intersection of finitely many minimal primes over it. These facts carry only the dependent-choice cost recorded for Noetherian induction (A Noetherian ring has finitely many minimal prime ideals, A radical ideal in a Noetherian ring is a finite intersection of minimal primes, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain).

[F11]

A Weil divisor on the normal Noetherian scheme X is a locally finite formal sum ∑nZ[Z] over the prime divisors of X, and these sums form the group Div⁡(X) (Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme).

[F12]

In an integral scheme the generic point lies in every nonempty open subset (Integral schemes, Generic points of irreducible closed subsets).

[F13]

The divisor div⁡C(f) of a global meromorphic unit is the Cartier divisor represented by the single local equation f on the open X; if X is normal Noetherian and integral, then the global meromorphic units are exactly the nonzero elements of K(X) and div⁡W(f)=∑Zord⁡Z(f)[Z] (Principal cartier divisor, Principal weil divisor and class group, Integral schemes).

Proof

Given: A normal Noetherian scheme X, the Axiom of Dependent Choice, a Cartier divisor D with local-equation datum {(Ui,fi)}i∈I, and a point x∈X for the local-finiteness argument.

1.1F3F4

Germs of the local equations at prime divisors are units. Let Z⊆X be a prime divisor with generic point ξ and let i with ξ∈Ui. By [F3] the stalk KX,ξ is the fraction field of the discrete valuation ring OX,ξ. The germ map carries the unit fi to a unit fi,ξ by [F4], so fi,ξ≠0 and its normalized valuation vξ(fi,ξ) is defined.

1.2F1F4F51.1

The value is independent of the equation and of the datum. If ξ∈Ui∩Uj, then u=fi/fj lies in OX×(Ui∩Uj) by [F1], so its germ uξ is a unit of OX,ξ and vξ(fi,ξ)=vξ(uξ)+vξ(fj,ξ)=vξ(fj,ξ). If {(Vj,gj)}j∈J is any second local-equation datum for D, then fi/gj∈OX×(Ui∩Vj) for all i,j by [F1]; every generic point ξ lies in some overlap Ui∩Vj, and the same computation gives vξ(fi,ξ)=vξ(gj,ξ). Hence the value ord⁡Z(D):=vξ(fi,ξ) depends only on D and Z, not on the indices or the datum. The additivity of vξ used in the computation is [F5], and the germ of a unit is again a unit by [F4].

1.3F2F6F7F8

A basic affine neighbourhood carrying a fraction. There are an index i, an affine chart Spec⁡A from the finite cover of [F6], and a basic open W=D(c)=Spec⁡B with B=Ac such that x∈W⊆Ui∩Spec⁡A, the ring B is Noetherian, and the restriction fi∣W is the image of a fraction a/s∈SX(W)−1OX(W). [F2, F6, F7, F8] Choose a chart Spec⁡A from the finite cover [F6] and an index i with x∈Ui, so that Ui∩Spec⁡A is an open neighbourhood of x. By [F7], choose c∈A with x∈D(c)⊆Ui∩Spec⁡A; then B=Ac is Noetherian by [F8]. The restriction fi∣D(c) is a section of the sheafification KX=aPX, so by [F2] there is a smaller open neighbourhood of x on which it is the image of a presheaf section. Refine that neighbourhood to a basic open D(d)⊆D(c) containing x, and put W=D(d)=Spec⁡Ad. The presheaf section on W is a fraction a/s∈PX(W)=SX(W)−1OX(W). The ring Ad is Noetherian by [F8].

2.1F2F3F5F8F9F10F121.21.3

Finitely many supporting prime divisors meet the neighbourhood. In the notation of step 1.3, only finitely many prime divisors Z with Z∩W≠∅ satisfy ord⁡Z(D)≠0. Let Z be such a prime divisor and let ξ be its generic point. The scheme Z is integral, so by [F12] its generic point ξ lies in the nonempty open subset Z∩W of Z; let p⊆B be the prime corresponding to ξ, so that OX,ξ=Bp by [F9]. By [F3] the ring Bp is a one-dimensional local domain. Write aξ,sξ∈Bp for the images of a and s. Since s∈SX(W), its germ at ξ is a nonzerodivisor of the domain Bp, so sξ≠0; the germ of the class a/s at ξ is the fraction aξ/sξ and equals fi,ξ, which is nonzero by step 1.1, so aξ≠0. By step 1.2 and [F3] we have ord⁡Z(D)=vξ(aξ)−vξ(sξ), and vξ(aξ)≥0 because aξ∈Bp [F5]. Suppose first that vξ(aξ)>0. Then aξ∈pBp, so a∈p by [F9]. If a prime q satisfies (a)⊆q⊆p, then 0≠aξ∈qBp⊆pBp, and every nonzero prime ideal of the one-dimensional local domain Bp equals its maximal ideal, so qBp=pBp and hence q=p by [F9]; thus p is a minimal prime of B/(a). Otherwise vξ(aξ)=0, and ord⁡Z(D)≠0 forces vξ(sξ)≠0 [F5], so s∈p by [F9] and the same argument shows that p is a minimal prime of B/(s). The rings B/(a) and B/(s) are Noetherian by [F8] and have finitely many minimal primes by [F10]; distinct prime divisors have distinct generic points and hence distinct primes p, so the prime divisors meeting W with nonzero coefficient are among the finitely many whose generic point corresponds to a minimal prime of B/(a) or of B/(s).

2.2F11F61.11.21.32.1

The associated Weil divisor. By steps 1.1 and 1.2 the coefficient ord⁡Z(D)=vξ(fi,ξ) is a well-defined integer depending only on D and Z, and by steps 1.3 and 2.1 the family of prime divisors with nonzero coefficient is locally finite, since every point has a basic affine neighbourhood meeting only finitely many of them; hence the formal sum cyc⁡(D):=∑Zord⁡Z(D) [Z] is a Weil divisor on X by [F11], independent of the charts and local equations used because any two local-equation data give the same coefficients by step 1.2.

3.1F3F131.12.2∎

The integral case. Suppose that X is integral. Then the global meromorphic units of X are exactly the nonzero elements of K(X) and the Cartier divisor div⁡C(f) of f∈K(X)× is represented by the single local equation f on the open X [F13]. At the generic point ξ of each prime divisor, [F3] identifies the meromorphic stalk with the fraction field of OX,ξ; the germ of the global section f is the element used in the normalized valuation. Thus the coefficient of [Z] in cyc⁡(div⁡C(f)) is vξ(fξ)=ord⁡Z(f), exactly the coefficient of [Z] in div⁡W(f) by [F13]. Both sides are Weil divisors, so cyc⁡(div⁡C(f))=div⁡W(f).

Dependent Choice is used in [F3] to isolate an integral affine neighbourhood of each codimension-one point and in step 2.1 through the finite-minimal-prime theorem for B/(a) and B/(s) [F10]. Both uses are the recorded Noetherian-induction cost; the finite choices of the elements gj add no choice principle. No global existence or enumeration of irreducible components is used. The remaining steps are choice-free.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

112 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources