Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Divisors of rational differentials form one linear equivalence class

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let C be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over a field k and let ω,ω′ be nonzero rational differentials on C. Then there is a unique f∈k(C)× with ω′=fω, and div⁡(ω′)=div⁡(ω)+div⁡W(f). Consequently their Weil divisors, and their corresponding Cartier divisors, are linearly equivalent; the divisors of nonzero rational differentials form one canonical class, and ωC≅OC(KC) for every canonical divisor KC.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, a smooth proper geometrically integral curve C, two nonzero rational differentials ω,ω′, and AC. The theorem AC implies DC implies countable choice gives DC from AC.

[F1]

Under AC, ωC=ΩC/k1 is an invertible sheaf, and its generic fibre is a one-dimensional k(C)-vector space. Thus each nonzero rational differential is a nonzero vector in that space. (Canonical bundle and canonical divisors, Invertible sheaves, Differentials of a smooth morphism, Rational section line bundle)

[F2]

At a closed point x, write a rational differential in any local frame as ω=gxηx. Its order is the DVR order of gx, independent of the frame; orders are additive on products. This is valid also for an inseparable residue extension and uses no differential of a uniformizer. (Canonical bundle and canonical divisors, Order codimension one rational function, Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings)

[F3]

For a nonzero rational section s of an invertible sheaf on an integral scheme, the rational-section theorem gives a Cartier divisor Ds=div⁡C(s) whose local equations are its coefficients in local frames, and an isomorphism OC(Ds)≅L carrying its canonical rational section to s (Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors, Cartier divisor, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor).

[F4]

Under AC the smooth proper curve is normal Noetherian, AC supplies DC, and the Cartier-to-Weil cycle map sends each Cartier divisor to the locally finite sum of its codimension-one local-equation orders. It is an isomorphism on a smooth proper curve and satisfies cyc⁡(div⁡C(f))=div⁡W(f) for f∈k(C)× (Cartier divisors on a normal Noetherian scheme give Weil divisors, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve, Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme, AC implies DC implies countable choice, The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain). The curve is quasi-compact, so locally finite support is finite, as also recorded by the finite-sum curve divisor convention Divisors on a smooth proper curve.

[F5]

For Weil divisors, D∼D′ means D−D′=div⁡W(f) for some f∈k(C)×; for Cartier divisors, D∼D′ means D−D′=div⁡C(f). The cycle isomorphism is compatible with these principal divisors (Principal weil divisor and class group, Linear equivalence cartier divisors, Principal cartier divisor, Cartier divisors on a normal Noetherian scheme give Weil divisors, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve).

Proof

1.1F1

By [F1], ω and ω′ are nonzero vectors in the same one-dimensional vector space over k(C), so there is a unique f∈k(C)× with ω′=fω.

1.2F2F3F4

Put Dω=div⁡C(ω) and Dω′=div⁡C(ω′), the Cartier divisors of [F3]. Their Weil cycles are the finite divisors cyc⁡(Dω)=div⁡(ω) and cyc⁡(Dω′)=div⁡(ω′), because the cycle coefficient at x is the order of the local equation gx and finite support follows from [F4].

1.3F3F4

For each ω′, the rational-section theorem [F3] gives OC(Dω′)≅ωC carrying the canonical rational section to ω′. The curve Cartier-to-Weil isomorphism identifies Dω′ with KC=div⁡(ω′), so OC(KC)≅ωC for every canonical divisor.

2.1F2step 1.1

Fix a closed point x and any local frame ηx of ωC, and write ω=gxηx and ω′=gx′ηx. The equality ω′=fω from step 1.1 gives gx′=fgx, so additivity of the normalized DVR order gives ord⁡x(ω′)=ord⁡x(f)+ord⁡x(ω). This frame calculation is valid also for inseparable residue extensions.

3.1F4step 1.2step 2.1

The pointwise identity of step 2.1 holds at every closed point, and each divisor has finite support by step 1.2, so coefficientwise equality gives div⁡(ω′)=div⁡(ω)+div⁡W(f). By [F4], the Cartier cycles satisfy cyc⁡(Dω′)=cyc⁡(Dω)+cyc⁡(div⁡C(f)); since the cycle map is an isomorphism, Dω′−Dω=div⁡C(f).

4.1F5step 3.1

The equality in step 3.1 says the Weil divisors differ by a principal Weil divisor, hence are linearly equivalent by [F5]; its Cartier form Dω′−Dω=div⁡C(f) makes the corresponding Cartier divisors linearly equivalent by [F5]. Thus every nonzero rational differential gives the same canonical divisor class.

5.1F4step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1step 1.3∎

The ratio is unique by step 1.1, the divisor formula is step 3.1, and steps 4.1 and 1.3 prove the asserted class and sheaf conclusions; the choice assumptions are AC and its consequence DC for the cited structural suppliers.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

115 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources