Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Sheaf of relative Kähler differentials

Definition

Let f ⁣:X→S be a morphism of schemes (Morphisms of schemes), so that f is in particular a morphism of ringed spaces and comes with a map of sheaves of rings f♯ ⁣:f−1OS→OX (Inverse image presheaf and inverse image sheaf); the pair (X,f) is an S-scheme (Schemes and morphisms over a base). Let F be a sheaf of OX-modules (Modules on a ringed space).

S-derivations. An S-derivation of OX into F is a morphism of sheaves of abelian groups D ⁣:OX→F such that for all local sections a,a′ of OX over a common open set W⊆X one has

D(a+a′)=D(a)+D(a′),D(aa′)=a D(a′)+a′ D(a),

and such that D annihilates the image of f♯ ⁣:f−1OS→OX: the composite f−1OS→f♯OX→DF is the zero map. Here the products and sums are taken in the rings OX(W). The set of all such D is written Der⁡S(OX,F); it is a Γ(X,OX)-module under the pointwise operations, and for a morphism F→G of OX-modules, postcomposition D↦α∘D maps Der⁡S(OX,F) to Der⁡S(OX,G). For S-schemes and S-morphisms the condition is that D kills f−1OS; when S is fixed one simply says derivation.

Construction of ΩX/S. Consider the presheaf of OX-modules

P ⁣:W⟼ΩOX(W)/(f−1OS)(W),

where W⊆X is open, the ring (f−1OS)(W) maps to OX(W) by fW♯, and ΩOX(W)/(f−1OS)(W) is the Kähler differential module of that ring map (Universal Kähler differential module), which exists by Existence and generators of Kähler differentials. For W′⊆W the restriction P(W)→P(W′) is the unique OX(W)-linear map induced, via the universal property of P(W), by the derivation OX(W)→OX(W′)→P(W′), where P(W′) is viewed as an OX(W)-module by restriction of scalars; the restriction maps compose, so P is a presheaf of OX-modules. Define

ΩX/S:=aP,

the sheafification of P (Sheafification of a presheaf); this is a sheaf of OX-modules by defining scalar multiplication on local representatives in the double-plus construction, with equality on germs making the operation well defined. The universal derivations dW ⁣:OX(W)→P(W) are compatible with the restriction maps by construction, so they define a morphism of presheaves and hence a morphism of sheaves

dX/S ⁣:OX⟶ΩX/S,

the universal S-derivation of X over S, and dX/S is an S-derivation because each dW is an AW-derivation for AW=(f−1OS)(W) and the maps AW→OX(W) are the structure maps fW♯.

Local descriptions. Two descriptions are used constantly and are recorded here for orientation; both are proved from the universal property in Universal property of relative differential sheaves and Affine charts recover the algebraic module of differentials.

  1. Functor of points form. For every OX-module F there is a natural bijection Hom⁡OX(ΩX/S,F)≅Der⁡S(OX,F), g↦g∘dX/S; this is the universal property that characterizes ΩX/S.
  2. Affine charts. If U=Spec⁡B⊆X is an affine open subscheme and f(U)⊆V=Spec⁡A for an affine open V⊆S, then the map B→ΩX/S(U), b↦dX/S(b) exhibits ΩX/S(U) as ΩB/A, compatibly with the universal derivations, and restriction to a basic open D(g)⊆U corresponds to the localization ΩB/A→ΩBg/A.

Affine module convention. The affine description (2) identifies ΩX/S on each affine chart with the sheaf attached to ΩB/A, with localization as restriction. This local description is the part used below; it needs no finiteness, flatness or separatedness hypothesis on f and also applies to the identity X→X.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources