Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Formal unramifiedness iff Omega vanishes

Statement

Let f ⁣:X→S be a morphism of schemes. Then f is formally unramified (Formally unramified morphism) if and only if ΩX/S=0 (Sheaf of relative Kähler differentials). No finite-type, finite-presentation, flatness or separatedness hypothesis is imposed on f, and no existence of lifts is asserted in either direction.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A morphism of schemes f ⁣:X→S.

[F1]

Formally unramified morphism: f is formally unramified if for every square-zero thickening i ⁣:T0↪T over S and every S-morphism T0→X there is at most one S-morphism T→X restricting to it; over affine opens Spec⁡B→Spec⁡A this says that two A-algebra maps B→C into a ring C with square-zero ideal I that agree modulo I are equal.

[F2]

The diagonal ideal modulo its square is Omega: for a ring map A→B and J=ker⁡(B⊗AB→B) one has J/J2≅ΩB/A via [1⊗b−b⊗1]↦db.

[F3]

Universal property of relative differential sheaves: for every OX-module G the map u↦u∘dX/S is a bijection Hom⁡OX(ΩX/S,G)≅Der⁡S(OX,G).

[F4]

Affine charts recover the algebraic module of differentials: for an affine open Spec⁡B⊆X lying over an affine open Spec⁡A⊆S one has Γ(Spec⁡B,ΩX/S)=ΩB/A; hence ΩX/S=0 if and only if ΩB/A=0 for all such charts.

[F5]

Sheaf of relative Kähler differentials: an S-derivation OX→G is additive, satisfies Leibniz, and kills the image of the structure map from OS.

[F6]

Closed immersions of schemes and Schemes and morphisms over a base: a closed immersion with ideal sheaf I=ker⁡(OT→i∗OT0) is a square-zero thickening when I2=0; a morphism is determined by its map of structure sheaves, so two morphisms of schemes are equal exactly when their sheaf maps are.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Assume ΩX/S=0; we show that lifts are unique. Let i ⁣:T0↪T be a square-zero thickening over S and let a0 ⁣:T0→X be an S-morphism with two S-morphism lifts a,b ⁣:T→X. Since a and b have the same underlying map on points, the direct images a∗OT and b∗OT are the same sheaf of rings F=OT pushed forward along this common map, and both a♯ and b♯ are maps OX→F; the difference δ:=b♯−a♯ is a morphism of sheaves of abelian groups valued in G:=a∗I, where I=ker⁡(OT→i∗OT0), because a and b agree on T0 after composition with OT→i∗OT0. The sheaf G is an OX-module through a♯, and δ is an S-derivation: it is additive, and for local sections x,y of OX one has δ(xy)=b♯(x)δ(y)+δ(x)a♯(y)=a♯(x)δ(y)+a♯(y)δ(x), since b♯(x)−a♯(x)∈G and G2⊆a∗I2=0. It kills the image of OS because a and b are S-morphisms. By [F3] with G and ΩX/S=0, Der⁡S(OX,G)=Hom⁡OX(0,G)=0, so δ=0, that is b♯=a♯; by [F6] a=b. Hence f is formally unramified.

F1F3F5F6
1.2

Assume f formally unramified; we show ΩB/A=0 on every affine chart. Let U=Spec⁡B⊆X be affine over an affine open V=Spec⁡A⊆S, put B′=(B⊗AB)/J2 with J=ker⁡(B⊗AB→B), and let q ⁣:B′→B be the quotient. The ideal J/J2=ker⁡q has square zero, so Spec⁡B→Spec⁡B′ is a square-zero thickening over A; the two A-algebra maps p1(b)=b⊗1 and p2(b)=1⊗b from B to B′ both compose with q to the identity, so the S-morphisms ci ⁣:Spec⁡B′→Spec⁡B↪X induced by pi agree on Spec⁡B. By [F1] applied to this thickening, c1=c2, and therefore the maps on global sections agree: p1=p2. Hence b⊗1=1⊗b in B′ for all b∈B, that is J/J2=0, and [F2] gives ΩB/A=0.

F1F2F6
2.1

Conclusion. Step 1.1 proves that ΩX/S=0 implies that f is formally unramified and step 1.2 that a formally unramified f has ΩB/A=0 on every affine chart, hence ΩX/S=0 by [F4]. This proves the equivalence; nowhere were finiteness, flatness or separatedness used, and no lift was constructed, only used for uniqueness in step 1.1.

F1F4step 1.1step 1.2∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources