Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An unramified morphism has an open diagonal

Statement

Let f ⁣:X→S be a morphism of schemes and let Δ=ΔX/S ⁣:X→X×SX be its diagonal (The diagonal morphism).

  1. If f is unramified (Unramified morphism) then Δ is an open immersion (Open immersions of schemes).
  2. Conversely, if f is locally of finite type and Δ is an open immersion, then f is unramified.

No separatedness hypothesis is needed in either direction: the diagonal of an unramified morphism need not be closed, and the diagonal need not be a closed immersion for the argument. Only local finite type is used, never finite presentation or flatness.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A morphism f ⁣:X→S with diagonal Δ ⁣:X→X×SX.

[F1]

Unramified morphism and Formal unramifiedness iff Omega vanishes: f is unramified if and only if f is locally of finite type and ΩX/S=0; equivalently if and only if f is locally of finite type and formally unramified.

[F2]

Locally finite type and finite type morphisms: over affine opens Spec⁡B⊆X and Spec⁡A⊆S with f(Spec⁡B)⊆Spec⁡A, the induced ring map A→B exhibits B as a finitely generated A-algebra.

[F3]

The diagonal morphism and Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products: on affine charts U=Spec⁡B over V=Spec⁡A the diagonal restricts to U→U×VU=Spec⁡(B⊗AB), the morphism induced by the multiplication μ ⁣:B⊗AB→B; it is a closed immersion by Closed immersions into affine schemes are quotient spectra because μ is surjective, with J=ker⁡μ.

[F4]

The diagonal ideal modulo its square is Omega: J/J2≅ΩB/A.

[F5]

Determinant trick for Nakayama: if M is a finitely generated module over a commutative ring C and IM=M for an ideal I, then there is a∈I with (1−a)M=0.

[F6]

Open immersions of schemes: an open immersion identifies its source isomorphically with an open subscheme of its target. A morphism which is injective on points and restricts, over the members of an open cover of its source, to isomorphisms onto open subschemes of the target is an open immersion; morphisms glue by Morphisms of schemes are local on compatible open covers.

[F7]

Affine charts recover the algebraic module of differentials and An idempotent partitions the spectrum into complementary clopen subsets: ΩX/S vanishes if and only if ΩB/A=0 on every affine chart; an idempotent e of a ring C gives a clopen partition Spec⁡C=D(e)⊔D(1−e) with V(e)=D(1−e), and for an idempotent the restriction ring is C1−e≅C/(e).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Chart description. Let U=Spec⁡B⊆X be affine over an affine open V=Spec⁡A⊆S, and write C=B⊗AB, J=ker⁡μ for the multiplication μ ⁣:C→B. By [F3] the diagonal restricts to the morphism ΔU ⁣:U→U×VU=Spec⁡C induced by μ, a closed immersion with ideal J. The elements 1⊗b−b⊗1 for b in a generating set of B over A generate J as a C-module, so if B is a finitely generated A-algebra, J is a finitely generated C-module; and by [F4] J/J2≅ΩB/A.

F2F3F4given
2.1

Unramified implies finite generation and Ω=0 on charts. If f is unramified then by [F1] it is locally of finite type and ΩX/S=0, so B is a finitely generated A-algebra and ΩB/A=0 on every chart; hence J is a finitely generated C-module with J=J2 by [F4]. Applying [F5] inside the ring C to the ideal J and the C-module J, we find e∈J with (1−e)J=0; then e2=e, since e∈J, and J=eC: indeed j=ej∈eC for j∈J and eC⊆J as J is an ideal.

F1F4F5step 1.1
2.2

Conversely, assume f locally of finite type and Δ an open immersion. Let U=Spec⁡B be an affine chart over V=Spec⁡A as in step 1.1. Since Δ−1(U×VU)⊇U, the restriction ΔU ⁣:U→U×VU is again an open immersion, and by [F3] it is also the closed immersion induced by the surjection μ ⁣:C→B with kernel J. Its image is therefore open and closed in Spec⁡C.

F3F6step 1.1
3.1

The chart diagonal is an open immersion when f is unramified. With e as in step 2.1, J=eC has radical (e), so the image V(J) of the closed immersion ΔU equals V(e)=D(1−e), which is open in Spec⁡C by [F7]. Moreover C/J=C/eC≅C/(e)≅C1−e is exactly the ring of the open subscheme D(1−e), and ΔU is the morphism C→C/J over Spec⁡C; hence ΔU identifies U isomorphically with the open subscheme D(1−e) of U×VU, so ΔU is an open immersion.

F3F6F7step 2.1
3.2

The image is a principal open. Let ΔU(U)=V(I) for the radical ideal I of the closed image and Spec⁡C∖ΔU(U)=V(K). Since these closed sets are complementary, I+K=C and IK⊆nil⁡(C) because V(IK)=Spec⁡C. Choose i∈I and k∈K with i+k=1, and choose m≥1 with (ik)m=0. Expanding 1=(i+k)2m−1, every monomial is divisible by either im or km, so 1=aim+bkm for some a,b∈C. Put e=aim; then 1−e=bkm and e(1−e)=ab(ik)m=0, hence e2=e. Since e∈I and 1−e∈K, we have ΔU(U)=V(I)⊆V(e)=D(1−e)⊆Spec⁡C∖V(K)=ΔU(U), so ΔU(U)=D(1−e).

F7step 2.2
4.1

Δ is an open immersion when f is unramified. The affine charts U of step 3.1 cover X, and for each of them Δ∣U=ΔU is an isomorphism onto the open subset D(1−eU) of U×VU⊆X×SX. The diagonal is injective on points, since Δ(x)=(x,x) determines x, and an open immersion is exactly a morphism which is locally on the source an isomorphism onto an open subscheme and injective on points; by [F6] the local isomorphisms glue to an isomorphism of X with the open subscheme Δ(X)=⋃UΔ(U) of X×SX. Hence Δ is an open immersion.

F6step 3.1
4.2

The conormal module vanishes. The open immersion ΔU identifies U with the open subscheme D(1−e), whose ring is C/(e) by [F7]; since the structure map of ΔU is C→C/J, the two descriptions of the same ring map give J=(e). Hence J2=(e2)=(e)=J, so J/J2=0 and [F4] gives ΩB/A=0. As the charts cover X and B was an arbitrary chart, [F7] gives ΩX/S=0; with f locally of finite type, [F1] makes f unramified.

F1F4F7step 3.2
5.1

Conclusion. Steps 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1 prove that an unramified f has open diagonal, and steps 2.2, 3.2 and 4.2 prove that a locally finite type f with open diagonal is unramified. No separatedness assumption was made: the diagonal is used as a closed immersion only on affine charts, where the multiplication B⊗AB→B is surjective, and the open condition comes from the idempotent splitting J=eC.

step 4.1step 4.2∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources