How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An unramified morphism has an open diagonal
Statement
Let be a morphism of schemes and let be its diagonal (The diagonal morphism).
- If is unramified (Unramified morphism) then is an open immersion (Open immersions of schemes).
- Conversely, if is locally of finite type and is an open immersion, then is unramified.
No separatedness hypothesis is needed in either direction: the diagonal of an unramified morphism need not be closed, and the diagonal need not be a closed immersion for the argument. Only local finite type is used, never finite presentation or flatness.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A morphism with diagonal .
Unramified morphism and Formal unramifiedness iff Omega vanishes: is unramified if and only if is locally of finite type and ; equivalently if and only if is locally of finite type and formally unramified.
Locally finite type and finite type morphisms: over affine opens and with , the induced ring map exhibits as a finitely generated -algebra.
The diagonal morphism and Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products: on affine charts over the diagonal restricts to , the morphism induced by the multiplication ; it is a closed immersion by Closed immersions into affine schemes are quotient spectra because is surjective, with .
Determinant trick for Nakayama: if is a finitely generated module over a commutative ring and for an ideal , then there is with .
Open immersions of schemes: an open immersion identifies its source isomorphically with an open subscheme of its target. A morphism which is injective on points and restricts, over the members of an open cover of its source, to isomorphisms onto open subschemes of the target is an open immersion; morphisms glue by Morphisms of schemes are local on compatible open covers.
Affine charts recover the algebraic module of differentials and An idempotent partitions the spectrum into complementary clopen subsets: vanishes if and only if on every affine chart; an idempotent of a ring gives a clopen partition with , and for an idempotent the restriction ring is .
Proof
Chart description. Let be affine over an affine open , and write , for the multiplication . By [F3] the diagonal restricts to the morphism induced by , a closed immersion with ideal . The elements for in a generating set of over generate as a -module, so if is a finitely generated -algebra, is a finitely generated -module; and by [F4] .
Unramified implies finite generation and on charts. If is unramified then by [F1] it is locally of finite type and , so is a finitely generated -algebra and on every chart; hence is a finitely generated -module with by [F4]. Applying [F5] inside the ring to the ideal and the -module , we find with ; then , since , and : indeed for and as is an ideal.
Conversely, assume locally of finite type and an open immersion. Let be an affine chart over as in step 1.1. Since , the restriction is again an open immersion, and by [F3] it is also the closed immersion induced by the surjection with kernel . Its image is therefore open and closed in .
The chart diagonal is an open immersion when is unramified. With as in step 2.1, has radical , so the image of the closed immersion equals , which is open in by [F7]. Moreover is exactly the ring of the open subscheme , and is the morphism over ; hence identifies isomorphically with the open subscheme of , so is an open immersion.
The image is a principal open. Let for the radical ideal of the closed image and . Since these closed sets are complementary, and because . Choose and with , and choose with . Expanding , every monomial is divisible by either or , so for some . Put ; then and , hence . Since and , we have , so .
is an open immersion when is unramified. The affine charts of step 3.1 cover , and for each of them is an isomorphism onto the open subset of . The diagonal is injective on points, since determines , and an open immersion is exactly a morphism which is locally on the source an isomorphism onto an open subscheme and injective on points; by [F6] the local isomorphisms glue to an isomorphism of with the open subscheme of . Hence is an open immersion.
The conormal module vanishes. The open immersion identifies with the open subscheme , whose ring is by [F7]; since the structure map of is , the two descriptions of the same ring map give . Hence , so and [F4] gives . As the charts cover and was an arbitrary chart, [F7] gives ; with locally of finite type, [F1] makes unramified.
Conclusion. Steps 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1 prove that an unramified has open diagonal, and steps 2.2, 3.2 and 4.2 prove that a locally finite type with open diagonal is unramified. No separatedness assumption was made: the diagonal is used as a closed immersion only on affine charts, where the multiplication is surjective, and the open condition comes from the idempotent splitting .
Depends on
- Unramified morphism
- The diagonal ideal modulo its square is Omega
- The diagonal morphism
- Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products
- Open immersions of schemes
- Determinant trick for Nakayama
- Closed immersions into affine schemes are quotient spectra
- Affine charts recover the algebraic module of differentials
- Locally finite type and finite type morphisms
- Formal unramifiedness iff Omega vanishes
- Morphisms of schemes are local on compatible open covers
- An idempotent partitions the spectrum into complementary clopen subsets
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Morphisms, Lemma 29.36.13 (tag 02GE) and Stacks Algebra, Lemma 10.151.4 (standard reference, not scraped)