Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Unramified residue extensions are finite separable

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let f ⁣:X→S be a morphism of schemes, let x∈X and put s=f(x). Suppose that f is locally of finite type at x (Locally finite type and finite type morphisms): there are affine opens Spec⁡B⊆X containing x and Spec⁡A⊆S containing s with f(Spec⁡B)⊆Spec⁡A and B a finitely generated A-algebra. Suppose further that the stalk at x of ΩX/S vanishes (Sheaf of relative Kähler differentials). Write mx for the maximal ideal of OX,x and ms for the maximal ideal of OS,s, and let κ(x) and κ(s) be the residue fields (The residue field at a point of an affine scheme). Then

  1. κ(x)/κ(s) is a finite separable extension (Separable algebraic elements and separable extensions), and
  2. msOX,x=mx.

In particular both conclusions hold at every point of an unramified morphism (Unramified morphism), and at every point of a morphism which is locally of finite type and formally etale (Formally etale morphism). The Axiom of Choice is used only through the finite-type field lemma Finite-type field extensions with zero Ω and Nakayama's lemma; the separable-residue cotangent input Separable residue and the cotangent sequence of a local algebra is choice-free. No flatness, finite presentation or separatedness hypothesis is imposed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A morphism f ⁣:X→S of schemes, a point x∈X with s=f(x), affine opens Spec⁡B⊆X and Spec⁡A⊆S with x∈Spec⁡B, f(Spec⁡B)⊆Spec⁡A and B a finitely generated A-algebra, and ΩX/S,x=0.

[F1]

Locally finite type and finite type morphisms: f is locally of finite type at x exactly when x has an affine open neighbourhood U=Spec⁡B whose image lies in an affine open V=Spec⁡A of S with A→B of finite type, that is, B generated as an A-algebra by finitely many elements b1,…,bN.

[F2]

Affine charts recover the algebraic module of differentials, Kähler differentials commute with localization, Localisation at a prime ideal: Rp=(R∖p)−1R, Rp is local with unique maximal ideal pRp, The residue field at a point of an affine scheme and Rp/pRp≅Frac⁡(R/p) is the residue field at p: on the affine chart Spec⁡B the sheaf ΩX/S is the sheaf attached to ΩB/A, so for the prime p⊆B with x=p and q=p∩A the stalk is ΩX/S,x≅(ΩB/A)p≅ΩBp/Aq,Bp=OX,x,Aq=OS,s. Moreover Bp is a local ring with maximal ideal m:=pBp, ms:=qAq is the maximal ideal of the local ring Aq, one has msBp⊆m, and κ(x)≅Bp/pBp≅Frac⁡(B/p),κ(s)≅Aq/qAq≅Frac⁡(A/q).

[F3]

Finitely generated field extensions F(a1,…,ar): a field extension K=k(α1,…,αn) generated by finitely many elements is finitely generated; an algebraic finitely generated extension inside a fixed finitely generated one is finite by An extension generated by finitely many algebraic elements is finite.

[F4]

The Axiom of Choice: the Axiom of Choice is assumed in this item; it is consumed by Finite-type field extensions with zero Ω and Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma.

[F5]

Conormal exact sequence for an algebra quotient, Transitivity sequence for differential modules and Derivations are maps out of Ω: for a ring map A′→P and an ideal I⊆P with B′=P/I the sequence I/I2→B′⊗PΩP/A′→ΩB′/A′→0 is exact; for ring maps A′→B′→C′ the sequence C′⊗B′ΩB′/A′→ΩC′/A′→ΩC′/B′→0 is exact; and ΩA′/A′=0 because Hom⁡(ΩA′/A′,M)≅Der⁡A′(A′,M)=0 for every A′-module M. In particular, if A′→B′ is surjective then ΩB′/A′=0: apply the conormal sequence to P=A′, I=ker⁡(A′→B′).

[F6]

Finite-type field extensions with zero Ω: assuming Choice, a finitely generated field extension with vanishing module of differentials is finite and separable.

[F7]

Separable residue and the cotangent sequence of a local algebra: let k be a field and R a Noetherian local k-algebra with maximal ideal m and residue field κ, finitely generated and separably generated over k; then 0→m/m2→ΩR/k⊗Rκ→Ωκ/k→0 is exact. If in addition κ/k is finite separable, then Ωκ/k=0 and the first map is an isomorphism m/m2≅ΩR/k⊗Rκ.

[F8]

Separating transcendence basis and separably generated extensions: a finitely generated extension admitting a separating transcendence basis is separably generated, and the empty tuple is a separating transcendence basis exactly when the extension is finite separable; so every finite separable extension is separably generated.

[F9]

Kähler differentials commute with scalar base change, A field has only the zero ideal and itself, hence is Noetherian, Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring and Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian: for ring maps A→B, A→A′ there is an isomorphism ΩB/A⊗B(B⊗AA′)≅Ω(B⊗AA′)/A′; a field is a Noetherian ring, every finitely generated algebra over a Noetherian ring is Noetherian, and quotients and localisations of Noetherian rings are Noetherian.

[F10]

Localisation of modules is extension of scalars and M⊗RR/I≅M/IM naturally: for a ring R, multiplicative S⊆R and R-module M one has S−1M≅S−1R⊗RM, and for an ideal I⊆R one has M⊗R(R/I)≅M/IM.

[F11]

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma, The Jacobson radical of a ring and A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal: assuming Choice, if I⊆J(R) and M is a finitely generated R-module with IM=M, then M=0; in a local ring J(R) is the unique maximal ideal and the maximal ideal of a nonzero local ring is finitely generated as soon as the ring is Noetherian.

[F12]

Unramified morphism, Formal unramifiedness iff Omega vanishes and Formally etale morphism: f is unramified exactly when it is locally of finite type and ΩX/S=0; a morphism is formally unramified exactly when ΩX/S=0; and f is formally etale when it is formally smooth and formally unramified, so a formally etale morphism satisfies ΩX/S=0.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The local picture. Let p⊆B be the prime with x=p and q=p∩A, so that s=f(x) corresponds to q. Put R:=Bp=OX,x and A′:=Aq=OS,s, with maximal ideals m=pBp and ms=qAq. By [F2], κ(x)=Frac⁡(B/p), κ(s)=Frac⁡(A/q), msR⊆m, and the hypothesis reads ΩR/A′=(ΩB/A)p=ΩX/S,x=0.

givenF1F2
1.2

Choice. Assume the Axiom of Choice [F4]; it is consumed below only by the two Choice-dependent results [F6] and [F11], while the separable-residue supplier [F7] is choice-free.

givenF4
2.1

The residue extension is finitely generated. By [F1] the A-algebra B is generated by finitely many elements b1,…,bN, so B/p is generated as an A/q-algebra, hence as a κ(s)-algebra, by the images of the bi; therefore κ(x)=Frac⁡(B/p) is a finitely generated field extension of κ(s) in the sense of [F3].

step 1.1F1F3
2.2

The differentials of the residue extension vanish. Apply the conormal sequence [F5] to the ring map A′→R and the ideal m⊆R with R/m=κ(x): the sequence m/m2→κ(x)⊗RΩR/A′→Ωκ(x)/A′→0 is exact, and ΩR/A′=0 by step 1.1, so Ωκ(x)/A′=0. The structure map A′→κ(x) factors as A′→κ(s)→κ(x) with A′→κ(s) surjective, and Ωκ(s)/A′=0 by [F5]; the transitivity sequence [F5] for A′→κ(s)→κ(x) has first term Ωκ(s)/A′⊗κ(s)κ(x)=0 and is exact at Ωκ(x)/A′, so the natural map Ωκ(x)/A′→Ωκ(x)/κ(s) is an isomorphism. Hence Ωκ(x)/κ(s)=0.

step 1.1F5
2.3

The fibre ring. Put Rˉ:=R/msR, mˉ:=m/msR. By [F10], Rˉ≅R⊗A′κ(s)=Bp⊗Aqκ(s)≅(B⊗Aκ(s))p, the last isomorphism because localisation is extension of scalars and κ(s)=Aq/qAq; hence Rˉ is a localisation of the finitely generated κ(s)-algebra B⊗Aκ(s) [F9], so Rˉ is a Noetherian local κ(s)-algebra with maximal ideal mˉ and residue field Rˉ/mˉ≅R/m=κ(x).

step 1.1F9F10
3.1

κ(x)/κ(s) is finite separable. By step 2.1 the extension κ(x)/κ(s) is finitely generated and by step 2.2 it has vanishing module of differentials, so [F6], applied under the Axiom of Choice of step 1.2, shows that κ(x)/κ(s) is finite and separable.

step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2F6
3.2

The differentials of the fibre ring vanish. By [F9], Ω(B⊗Aκ(s))/κ(s)≅ΩB/A⊗B(B⊗Aκ(s)); localising at p and using ΩR/A′=(ΩB/A)p=0 from step 1.1 together with Rˉ≅(B⊗Aκ(s))p from step 2.3 gives ΩRˉ/κ(s)≅(ΩB/A)p⊗BpRˉ=0.

step 1.1step 2.3F9
4.1

The cotangent space of the fibre ring vanishes. The field κ(x) is a finite separable extension of κ(s) by step 3.1, hence separably generated over κ(s) by [F8]; the ring Rˉ is a Noetherian local κ(s)-algebra with residue field κ(x) by step 2.3, so the supplier [F7] applies and the injective cotangent map is an isomorphism mˉ/mˉ2≅ΩRˉ/κ(s)⊗Rˉκ(x)=0, the vanishing being step 3.2.

step 2.3step 3.1step 3.2F7F8
5.1

The maximal ideal of the fibre ring is zero. Since Rˉ is Noetherian [step 2.3], the ideal mˉ is finitely generated, and mˉ/mˉ2=0 by step 4.1 means mˉ=mˉ2. As mˉ=J(Rˉ) is the Jacobson radical of the local ring Rˉ [F11], Nakayama's lemma [F11] with I=M=mˉ gives mˉ=0.

step 2.3step 4.1F11
6.1

The maximal ideals match. Since mˉ=m/msR is zero by step 5.1, we get m=msR, that is mf(x)OX,x=mx.

step 1.1step 2.3step 5.1
7.1

Conclusion. Steps 3.1 and 6.1 prove the two assertions under the stated hypotheses. If f is unramified then ΩX/S=0 by [F12], so the hypotheses hold at every point x; if f is formally etale and locally of finite type then ΩX/S=0 by [F12] and again the hypotheses hold at every point. The Axiom of Choice entered only through [F6] in step 3.1 and [F11] in step 5.1.

step 3.1step 6.1F12∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

146 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources