How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Transitivity sequence for differential modules
Statement
Let be homomorphisms of commutative rings. Then the sequence of -modules
is exact, where the first map sends to and the second is induced by . The first arrow is not asserted to be injective, and it fails to be injective in general; exactness on the left is not part of the statement.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Ring homomorphisms of commutative rings.
Derivations are maps out of Ω: for every ring map with Kähler differential module and every -module , composition with is a natural -module isomorphism .
Existence and generators of Kähler differentials: a Kähler differential module exists for every ring map, and it is generated as a module by the elements .
Derivation of an algebra: an -derivation is additive, -constant and satisfies the Leibniz rule; an -derivation that kills the image of is a -derivation, since .
Proof
The first map. The composite is an -derivation of into the -module ; by [F1] it corresponds to a -linear map with . Its extension of scalars along is the -linear map with .
The second map. The universal -derivation is also an -derivation, so [F1] applied to gives a -linear map with . It is surjective because the elements generate over by [F2].
The composite vanishes. For and , , since is -constant: is the image of an element of , so in the definition of a -derivation of . Hence there is an induced -linear map out of , and it is surjective by step 1.2.
A left inverse for . The map sending to the class of is the composite of the -derivation with the -linear quotient map, hence an -derivation, and it kills because is the class of , which is zero in . As is -linear and kills , it satisfies for , by the Leibniz rule, so is a -derivation; [F1] applied to the ring map gives a -linear map with .
is inverse to . For all we have and by the defining property of in step 3.1. The elements generate and the classes generate over by [F2], so and . Hence is an isomorphism, , and with surjective the displayed sequence is exact.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Algebra 10.131.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vakil 22.2.9–11, pp.578–579 (standard reference, not scraped)