Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Universal Kähler differential module

Definition

Let A→φB be a homomorphism of commutative rings and let Der⁡A(B,−) be the derivation functor of Derivation of an algebra. A Kähler differential module for A→B is a pair (ΩB/A,d) consisting of a B-module ΩB/A and an A-derivation d ⁣:B→ΩB/A such that for every B-module M the assignment

g⟼g∘d,Hom⁡B(ΩB/A,M)⟶Der⁡A(B,M),

is a bijection, and such that these bijections are natural in M: for every B-linear map h ⁣:M→N the square

Hom⁡B(ΩB/A,M)→ g↦g∘d Der⁡A(B,M)↓h∘−↓h∘−Hom⁡B(ΩB/A,N)→ g↦g∘d Der⁡A(B,N)

commutes. In other words, ΩB/A represents the covariant functor M↦Der⁡A(B,M) on B-modules, and d is the universal A-derivation of B over A; the element db is the image of b under it. Whether such a pair exists for a given A→B is not part of the definition; when it does, the pair is uniquely determined up to a unique compatible isomorphism, as the next paragraph records.

Uniqueness. If (Ω,d) and (Ω′,d′) are both Kähler differential modules for the same ring map A→B, the universal property of the first applied to the derivation d′ produces a unique B-linear u ⁣:Ω→Ω′ with u∘d=d′, and the property of the second applied to d produces a unique B-linear v ⁣:Ω′→Ω with v∘d′=d. Then (v∘u)∘d=v∘d′=d and (u∘v)∘d′=d′, while the identity maps of Ω and Ω′ have the same property; the injectivity clause of the universal property applied twice gives v∘u=idΩ and u∘v=idΩ′. So u is an isomorphism with inverse v, and u is the only B-linear map from Ω to Ω′ compatible with the two universal derivations. In particular ΩB/A is determined by the ring map A→B up to canonical isomorphism, which is what justifies writing it as ΩB/A without further qualification.

Functoriality in ring maps. Given a commutative square of ring maps A→B, A′→B′, u:A→A′ and v:B→B′, and universal pairs for its two horizontal maps, regard ΩB′/A′ as a B-module through v. The composite d′∘v is an A-derivation: it is additive, satisfies Leibniz with this module action, and kills A since the square commutes. Universality gives a unique B-linear map ΩB/A→ΩB′/A′ sending db to d′(v(b)). For identity squares this is the identity; for composable squares the composite has the prescribed values on db and so equals the map of the composite square by uniqueness. This proves functoriality in ring maps separately from naturality in the target module M.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources