Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nonconstant morphisms of proper curves are finite and surjective

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let f:C→D be a k-morphism of proper integral curves over a field k which is nonconstant in the sense that the image f(C) consists of more than one point (equivalently, f does not factor through the structure morphism of Spec⁡ of a field). Then f is surjective and finite; in particular f is dominant, the comorphism k(D)→k(C), g↦g∘f, embeds k(D) into k(C), and [k(C):k(D)] is finite.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, proper integral curves C,D over k, and a nonconstant k-morphism f:C→D.

[F1]

A curve over k is nonempty, integral, separated, of finite type over k and of chain dimension one; a proper curve is additionally proper over k, and every nonempty open subscheme contains the generic point. (Curves over a field, Integral schemes)

[F2]

A morphism is proper if and only if it is separated, of finite type and universally closed; a universally closed morphism is closed, so the image of a closed subset is closed, and the image of an irreducible space is irreducible. (Proper morphisms, Universally closed morphisms, Irreducible topological spaces and irreducible subsets in the subspace topology)

[F3]

If f:X→S is proper and g:Y→S is separated, then every S-morphism h:X→Y is proper. (Morphisms from a proper scheme to a separated one are proper)

[F4]

Under Choice, every proper closed subset of a curve is a finite set of closed points, and every point other than the generic point is closed. (Proper closed subsets of a curve are finite)

[F5]

A finite morphism has affine inverse images of affine opens: if U=Spec⁡A⊆D, then f−1(U)=Spec⁡B with B a finite A-module. (Finite morphisms of schemes)

[F6]

For an integral finite-type k-scheme W, its function field is k(W)=Frac⁡(A) for every nonempty affine open Spec⁡A⊆W. (Function field of an integral finite-type scheme)

[F7]

The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F8]

Stacks Project, Algebraic Curves, Lemma 53.2.4 (tag 0CCL): a k-morphism X→Y is finite if Y is separated over k, X is proper over k of dimension at most one, and the image of every one-dimensional irreducible component of X contains at least two points.

Proof

technique · use closedness for surjectivity and the finite-morphism criterion for maps from proper curves; then compute the function-field degree on affine charts
1.1F1F2F3given

By [F1] the schemes C and D are nonempty, integral, separated and of finite type over k, with C proper over k; by [F3] the morphism f, being a k-morphism from a proper k-scheme to a separated k-scheme, is proper. Hence f is of finite type, universally closed and closed by [F2], and its image f(C) is closed and irreducible; it is nonempty because C is nonempty.

1.2F1F8given

The hypotheses of [F8] hold: D is separated over k, C is proper of dimension one over k, and the image of its sole one-dimensional irreducible component has more than one point. Therefore f is finite. The cited lemma checks finite fibres over images of closed points; it does not treat the fibre over the generic point as a closed subset.

2.1F1F2F4step 1.1given

If f(C) were a proper closed subset of D, then by [F4] it would be a finite set of closed points, hence discrete. A nonempty finite discrete irreducible space is a single point, contradicting nonconstancy. Thus f(C)=D and f is surjective.

3.1F1F5F6step 1.2step 2.1

Let U=Spec⁡A be a nonempty affine open of D. By finiteness [F5], f−1(U)=Spec⁡B with B finite as an A-module. Both rings are domains [F1]. Surjectivity implies A→B is injective: an element in its kernel lies in every prime of A, hence is zero. Set L=Frac⁡(A) and K=Frac⁡(B) [F6]. The localization B⊗AL is a finite-dimensional domain over L, hence a field; since it contains B, it equals K. Thus k(D)=L↪K=k(C) is a finite field extension.

4.1F4F7F8step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1∎

Steps 1.2, 2.1 and 3.1 prove finiteness, surjectivity and the finite function-field embedding. The stated Choice premise is inherited from [F4] in step 2.1; [F8] itself states no Choice premise.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources