How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Nonconstant morphisms of proper curves are finite and surjective
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a -morphism of proper integral curves over a field which is nonconstant in the sense that the image consists of more than one point (equivalently, does not factor through the structure morphism of of a field). Then is surjective and finite; in particular is dominant, the comorphism , , embeds into , and is finite.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , proper integral curves over , and a nonconstant -morphism .
A curve over is nonempty, integral, separated, of finite type over and of chain dimension one; a proper curve is additionally proper over , and every nonempty open subscheme contains the generic point. (Curves over a field, Integral schemes)
A morphism is proper if and only if it is separated, of finite type and universally closed; a universally closed morphism is closed, so the image of a closed subset is closed, and the image of an irreducible space is irreducible. (Proper morphisms, Universally closed morphisms, Irreducible topological spaces and irreducible subsets in the subspace topology)
If is proper and is separated, then every -morphism is proper. (Morphisms from a proper scheme to a separated one are proper)
Under Choice, every proper closed subset of a curve is a finite set of closed points, and every point other than the generic point is closed. (Proper closed subsets of a curve are finite)
A finite morphism has affine inverse images of affine opens: if , then with a finite -module. (Finite morphisms of schemes)
For an integral finite-type -scheme , its function field is for every nonempty affine open . (Function field of an integral finite-type scheme)
The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)
Stacks Project, Algebraic Curves, Lemma 53.2.4 (tag 0CCL): a -morphism is finite if is separated over , is proper over of dimension at most one, and the image of every one-dimensional irreducible component of contains at least two points.
Proof
By [F1] the schemes and are nonempty, integral, separated and of finite type over , with proper over ; by [F3] the morphism , being a -morphism from a proper -scheme to a separated -scheme, is proper. Hence is of finite type, universally closed and closed by [F2], and its image is closed and irreducible; it is nonempty because is nonempty.
The hypotheses of [F8] hold: is separated over , is proper of dimension one over , and the image of its sole one-dimensional irreducible component has more than one point. Therefore is finite. The cited lemma checks finite fibres over images of closed points; it does not treat the fibre over the generic point as a closed subset.
If were a proper closed subset of , then by [F4] it would be a finite set of closed points, hence discrete. A nonempty finite discrete irreducible space is a single point, contradicting nonconstancy. Thus and is surjective.
Let be a nonempty affine open of . By finiteness [F5], with finite as an -module. Both rings are domains [F1]. Surjectivity implies is injective: an element in its kernel lies in every prime of , hence is zero. Set and [F6]. The localization is a finite-dimensional domain over , hence a field; since it contains , it equals . Thus is a finite field extension.
Steps 1.2, 2.1 and 3.1 prove finiteness, surjectivity and the finite function-field embedding. The stated Choice premise is inherited from [F4] in step 2.1; [F8] itself states no Choice premise.
Depends on
- Curves over a field
- The Axiom of Choice
- Finite morphisms of schemes
- Integral schemes
- Irreducible topological spaces and irreducible subsets in the subspace topology
- Proper morphisms
- Universally closed morphisms
- Proper closed subsets of a curve are finite
- Function field of an integral finite-type scheme
- Morphisms from a proper scheme to a separated one are proper
Used by
- Degree of a nonconstant morphism of curves Definition
- Hyperelliptic curves and hyperelliptic maps Definition
- Ramification points, branch points and unramifiedness Definition
- Ramification indices of the power map on the projective line Example
- Ramification of the double cover y²=f(x) Example
- Fibres, pullbacks and degrees of divisors under a finite morphism of curves Lemma
- The Riemann-Hurwitz formula with the different Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Algebraic Curves, Lemma 53.2.4 (tag 0CCL) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Algebraic Curves (tag 0BRV) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Morphisms of Schemes, §§29, 33-35, 43 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (version of October 21, 2025), Chs. 19 and 21 (standard reference, not scraped)