Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ramification of the double cover y^2=f(x)

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) for the current normalization, curve/function-field, finiteness, smooth-differential, properness, ampleness, and Čech-cohomology supplier routes used below. Let k be algebraically closed of characteristic ≠2 and let f∈k[x] be squarefree of degree n=2g+1 or n=2g+2 with g≥1. The affine curve y2=f(x) has a smooth projective model C, and the projection to the x-line is a finite surjective morphism π:C→Pk1 of degree two that is branched exactly at the roots of f and, when n is odd, at infinity: over each of these 2g+2 branch points there lies exactly one point with ep=2, and over every other closed point of Pk1 there lie two points with ep=1. The plane model X of C has degree n and pa(X)=(n−1)(n−2)2. Its only possible singular point is infinity; that point is singular exactly when n≥4, with δ∞=(n−1)(n−2)2−g. For n=3 (so g=1), the plane cubic is smooth and the singularity sum is empty, with δ∞=0. In all cases g(C)=g.

The ramification assertions use only char⁡k≠2 and squarefreeness of f. The genus computation is carried out for algebraically closed k, because the delta invariant (Delta invariant of a curve singularity) and the plane-curve genus correction (Geometric genus of a plane curve by delta invariants) are stated over algebraically closed fields.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An algebraically closed field k with char⁡k≠2, a squarefree polynomial f∈k[x] of degree n=2g+1 or n=2g+2, g≥1, the affine curve U=V(y2−f)⊆Ak2, the plane model X=V+(G)⊆Pk2 with G=Y2Zn−2−F(X,Z) and F(X,Z)=Znf(X/Z), and the normalization ν:C→X; the Axiom of Choice is assumed.

[F1]

Jacobian criterion over an algebraically closed field: a closed point of V(h)⊆Ak2 is regular exactly when the two partial derivatives of h do not both vanish there. (Jacobian rank detects regularity at closed points)

[F2]

For an integral plane curve X=V+(F) of degree d one has H0(X,OX)=k and pa(X)=(d−1)(d−2)2. (Arithmetic genus of a plane curve)

[F3]

The normalization ν:C→X is finite, birational, C is integral and normal with k(C)=k(X), and over the algebraically closed field k the curve C is smooth; for a smooth proper geometrically connected curve the genus is g(C)=h1(C,OC)=1−χ(OC), and the geometric genus of X is g(X)=g(C). (Normalization of an integral finite-type curve by gluing affine integral closures, Geometric genus of a singular curve, Genus and arithmetic genus of a curve, Curves over a field)

[F4]

The delta invariant is δx(X)=dim⁡k((ν∗OC)x/OX,x), it vanishes exactly at regular points, and pa(X)=g(Xnu)+∑xδx(X), equivalently g(Xnu)=(d−1)(d−2)2−∑xδx(X) for the plane model of degree d. (Delta invariant of a curve singularity, Arithmetic genus, geometric genus and delta invariants, Geometric genus of a plane curve by delta invariants)

[F5]

Dominant k-morphisms C→D of smooth proper geometrically integral curves correspond bijectively to injective k-algebra homomorphisms k(D)↪k(C); a nonconstant morphism is finite, surjective and has degree deg⁡(f)=[k(C):k(D)]. (Smooth proper curves, dominant morphisms and function fields, Degree of a nonconstant morphism of curves, Nonconstant morphisms of proper curves are finite and surjective)

[F6]

The ramification index is ep=ord⁡p of the pullback of a uniformizer of the target; for every closed point q one has ∑p∈f−1(q)ep[κ(p):κ(q)]=deg⁡(f); the differential-ramification locus consists of the points with ep>1 together with those having inseparable residue extension, and over the algebraically closed field k the residue extensions are trivial. (Ramification index of a morphism of curves, Fibre degree sum with ramification and residue degrees, Ramification points, branch points and unramifiedness)

[F7]

At a closed point p of the smooth curve C the local ring OC,p is a discrete valuation ring, ord⁡p is a valuation with ord⁡p(uv)=ord⁡p(u)+ord⁡p(v), and an element is a uniformizer exactly when its order is one. (Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings, Every nonzero fraction is a unit times a power of a uniformiser)

[F8]

The canonical bundle is ωC=ΩC/k1 and is locally free of rank one (Canonical bundle and canonical divisors, Differentials of a smooth morphism). At a closed point p of C, the residue field κ(p) is finite over k by the finite-type residue-field lemma, hence equals k because k is algebraically closed (Finite-type maps from Jacobson rings induce finite residue-field extensions at maximal ideals). The cotangent sequence for this finite separable residue extension identifies mp/mp2 with ΩC/k1⊗κ(p) (Separable residue and the cotangent sequence of a local algebra). The local ring is a discrete valuation ring, so a uniformizer tp gives a basis of the one-dimensional space mp/mp2 (Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings); consequently dtp gives a basis of ΩC/k1⊗κ(p) and Nakayama's lemma (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma) makes dtp a local frame of ωC near p. Thus for a nonzero rational differential ω=g dtp its order is ord⁡p(g), independently of the chosen uniformizer, agreeing with the frame definition (Canonical bundle and canonical divisors). Also div⁡(ω)=∑pord⁡p(ω)[p] is effective exactly when ω is a global section of ωC, two nonzero rational differentials on a smooth proper geometrically integral curve differ by a nonzero rational function g, and div⁡(gω)=div⁡(ω)+div⁡(g) (Canonical bundle and canonical divisors).

[F9]

The two-affine double-cover calculation gives dim⁡kH1(C,OC)=g when the separated scheme has affine rings k[x,y]/(y2−f) and k[t,w]/(w2−ψ), intersection obtained by inverting x or t, and transition t=x−1, w=x−(g+1)y. (Cohomology of a two-chart double cover)

[F10]

Projectivity of the model: for every scheme S the structure morphism PSm→S is proper; a morphism factoring as a closed immersion into Pkm followed by the projection is proper, so the plane model X is proper over k; the twisting sheaf O(1) on Pk1 is ample and for every finite morphism g:Y→Pk1 the pullback g∗O(1) is ample; a finite morphism is proper, a composite of a finite morphism with a proper morphism is proper, and a composite of finite-type morphisms is of finite type; finally, if Z is proper of finite type over a Noetherian scheme S and L is ample on Z, then for every sufficiently large d the power L⊗d is closed H-very ample relative to S, so that some S-closed immersion Z↪PSN pulls O(1) back to L⊗d. (Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base, Projective morphisms are proper, The projective-line twisting sheaf is ample, Finite pullback preserves absolute ampleness, Finite morphisms are proper, Composite of a finite morphism and a proper morphism is proper, High powers of an ample line bundle embed a proper scheme)

[F11]

A regular Noetherian ring is normal, and a normal domain is integrally closed in its fraction field: every element of the fraction field integral over the ring lies in it. In particular the local rings of a smooth affine curve over k are regular, so the curve and all its local rings are integrally closed. (regular local rings are normal, normal noetherian ring)

Proof technique: direct; identify the plane model and its only possible singular point, compute the ramification of the degree-two projection from the local normal forms, compute the genus of the smooth model by writing every regular differential against the explicit canonical divisor dx/y, and finish with the plane-curve delta correction.

Verification

1.1F1

The affine curve is smooth. Write h=y2−f(x)∈k[x,y]; its partial derivatives are 2y and −f′(x). At a common zero one has y=0 (characteristic ≠2) and f(x)=f′(x)=0, so x is a multiple root of f, contrary to squarefreeness. By the Jacobian criterion every closed point of U is regular.

1.2F2

The plane model. The polynomial G is homogeneous of degree n and Z∤G, because G(X,Y,0)=−F(X,0)=−anXn with an≠0; its dehomogenization at Z=1 is h=y2−f(x), which is irreducible in k[x,y] since deg⁡yh=2 and f is squarefree of degree at least three, hence not a square in k[x]. If G=G1G2 were a factorization into nonconstant forms, substituting Z=1 would express the irreducible h as a product, so one factor would dehomogenize to a nonzero constant c; that factor is homogeneous of positive degree and equals c on the hyperplane Z=1 at that point, hence is the form cZdeg⁡Gi, forcing Z∣G, a contradiction. Therefore G is irreducible, X is an integral plane curve of degree n, and U=X∩{Z≠0} is a dense open subscheme. By the plane-curve formula H0(X,OX)=k and pa(X)=(n−1)(n−2)2.

2.1F1step 1.1

The only possible singular point. On the chart Y≠0 put u=X/Y, v=Z/Y, so that X is cut out by g(u,v)=vn−2−F(u,v), where F(u,v)=∑i=0naiuivn−i is a binary form of degree n with an≠0. The point ∞=(0:1:0) corresponds to (u,v)=(0,0), and every term of F and of its first partial derivatives has order at least n−1≥2 at the origin; hence the partials of g at the origin are −Fu=0 and (n−2)vn−3−Fv, which vanish at the origin for n≥4 and equal (0,1) for n=3. Every other closed point of the chart lies either in U, which is regular by step 1.1, or has Z=0; but Z=0 on X forces X=0, so the only such point is ∞ itself. Hence ∞ is the only possibly singular point of X, and it is singular exactly when n≥4.

2.2F5step 1.2

A degree-two projection. The function field of X is k(X)=k(x,y) with y2=f(x) (step 1.2), and y2−f is irreducible over k(x) because f is squarefree of degree at least three and hence is not a square in k(x); therefore [k(X):k(x)]=2. By [F5] the inclusion k(x)↪k(C)=k(X) determines a dominant morphism π:C→Pk1 with π∗(x)=x, and π is finite and surjective of degree two.

3.1F1F11step 1.1step 2.2

The two affine charts. Finiteness of π (step 2.2) makes the preimages U′=π−1(Spec⁡k[x]) and Ct=π−1(Spec⁡k[t]) of the two standard affine charts of Pk1 affine, with coordinate rings A′ and B′ module-finite over k[x] and over k[t] respectively (Finite morphisms of schemes), and Frac⁡A′=Frac⁡B′=k(C). Put t=1/x, w=y tg+1, and ψ(t)=tnf(1/t) when n=2g+2, ψ(t)=tn+1f(1/t) when n=2g+1; then w2=ψ(t) in k(C). The subrings A=k[x,y]/(y2−f)⊆A′ and B=k[t,w]/(w2−ψ)⊆B′ have Frac⁡A=k(x,y)=k(C) and Frac⁡B=k(t,w)=k(C), the latter because [k(C):k(t)]=[k(C):k(x)]=2 by step 2.2 while w∉k(t). The polynomial ψ is squarefree: its roots are the inverses of the nonzero roots of f, all simple because f is squarefree, together with t=0 in the odd case, where ψ=tφ with φ(t)=tnf(1/t) of constant term an≠0, so that root is simple as well. Since char⁡k≠2, the Jacobian criterion [F1] shows that the localizations of A (step 1.1) and of B at maximal ideals are regular local rings, their localizations at the zero ideal are fraction fields, and so A and B are regular Noetherian domains, hence integrally closed [F11]; the same applies to A′ and B′, which are coordinate rings of affine opens of the smooth curve C. Now x∈A′ and y2=f(x)∈A′ with y∈k(C)=Frac⁡A′, so y∈A′ and A⊆A′; dually t∈B′ and w2=ψ(t)∈B′ give w∈B′ and B⊆B′. Every element of A′ is integral over k[x]⊆A and every element of B′ is integral over k[t]⊆B, so integrally closedness gives A′=A and B′=B. Consequently the closed points of the finite chart are the maximal ideals of A, the points of C over ∞ are the maximal ideals of B lying over (t), and the local rings of C at these points are the corresponding localizations.

4.1F6F7step 3.1

Ramification over finite points. Fix x0∈k and let p∈C lie over x0, so that p corresponds to a maximal ideal of A (step 3.1), while the pullback of the uniformizer x−x0 of Pk1 at x0 is the function x−x0, whence ep=ord⁡p(x−x0). If f(x0)≠0, choose y0∈k× with y02=f(x0) and write f(x)−f(x0)=(x−x0)u(x), without requiring u(x0)≠0. At p=(x0,y0) the factor y+y0 is a unit, so (y−y0)=(x−x0)u(x)/(y+y0) in the local ring and its maximal ideal (x−x0,y−y0) is (x−x0). At p′=(x0,−y0) the factor y−y0 is a unit, and the same identity gives (y+y0)=(x−x0)u(x)/(y−y0), so the maximal ideal (x−x0,y+y0) is again (x−x0). Thus x−x0 is a uniformizer at both points and ep=1, regardless of whether x0 is a critical point of f; these are exactly the two points over x0. If f(x0)=0, write f=(x−x0)u(x) with u(x0)≠0; then x−x0=y2u(x)−1 in k(C), so x−x0 lies in the square of the maximal ideal at the unique point p=(x0,0) of U and generates its square, whence the maximal ideal is generated by y, making y a uniformizer with ord⁡p(x−x0)=2, ep=2, and the fibre is {p}. In both cases the fibre-degree formula of [F6] shows that no further point lies over x0, because the displayed contributions already sum to deg⁡π=2 with trivial residue extensions.

4.2F6F7step 3.1

Ramification over infinity. The points of C over ∞ are the maximal ideals of B over (t), that is, the maximal ideals of B/(t)=k[w]/(w2−ψ(0)) (step 3.1). If n is even, then ψ(0)=an≠0 and k[w]/(w2−an)≅k×k, so there are exactly two points p± over ∞, and w is a unit at each of them. At p+ with c=an, the identity (w−c)(w+c)=ψ(t)−ψ(0)=t g(t), where g=(ψ−ψ(0))/t∈k[t], shows that w−c=t g(t)(w+c)−1∈(t) because w+c has nonzero residue 2c and is a unit; hence the maximal ideal (t,w−c) equals (t) and t is a uniformizer at p+, and the same computation with −c at p− gives a uniformizer t there too. If n is odd, then ψ(0)=0 and B/(t)=k[w]/(w2) is local with maximal ideal (w), so there is exactly one point p∞ over ∞; since ψ=tφ with φ(0)=an≠0, the element φ(t) is a unit at p∞, so t=w2φ(t)−1∈(w)2. In the local ring B(t,w), one has B(t,w)/(w)≅k[t](t)/(tφ(t))≅k, so its maximal ideal (t,w) is (w); hence w is a uniformizer at p∞ and ord⁡p∞(t)=2. In both cases the pullback of the uniformizer t of Pk1 at ∞ is the function t itself, so the orders just computed are the ramification indices: ep+=ep−=1 for even n, and ep∞=2 for odd n.

4.3F3F9F10step 2.2step 3.1

Genus and projectivity. The proper plane model X and finite normalization make C proper of finite type by [F3, F10]. The finite projection gives the ample sheaf L=π∗O(1) by [F10]. A positive power of L is closed H-very ample over the Noetherian base field by [F10], so C is projective. It is smooth of dimension one by [F3]. The two affine charts in step 3.1 are the inverse images of the standard cover of Pk1; their intersection is obtained by inverting x or t, with t=x−1 and w=x−(g+1)y. Properness supplies separatedness. Thus [F9] applies and gives h1(C,OC)=g, with classes x−1y,…,x−gy. The genus definition in [F3] now gives g(C)=g.

5.1F6step 4.1step 4.2

The branch locus. Combining step 4.1 and step 4.2: over a point x0∈k with f(x0)≠0 there are exactly two points of C, both with e=1; over each of the n roots of f there is exactly one point, with e=2; and over ∞ there are two points with e=1 when n is even and one point with e=2 when n is odd. Since k is algebraically closed, every residue field extension at these closed points is trivial, so the fibre-degree formula ∑p∈π−1(q)ep[κ(p):κ(q)]=deg⁡π=2 holds at every closed point q of Pk1, consistently with the counts. The ramification locus of π is therefore the set of n+[n odd]=2g+2 points over the roots of f and, for odd n, over infinity, all of index two, and the branch locus is exactly the set of the n roots of f together with ∞ when n is odd, again 2g+2 points; over each branch point lies exactly one ramification point, and over every other closed point of Pk1 lie two points with e=1.

5.2F7F8step 4.1step 4.2

The differential ω0=dx/y and its divisor. The form ω0=dx/y is a nonzero rational differential on C [F8]: y≠0 in the field k(C), and dx≠0 because k(C)/k(x) is separable of degree two in characteristic ≠2. At a point over x0 with f(x0)≠0, step 4.1 provides the uniformizer x−x0 and y is a unit, so ord⁡(dx/y)=ord⁡(y−1d(x−x0))=0; at the point over a root x0 of f, writing f=(x−x0)u with u(x0)≠0 gives x−x0=y2u(x)−1 and therefore dx/y=2u(x)−1(1+y2u(x)−2u′(x))−1dy. The coefficient is a unit at that point, so dx/y is a unit multiple of dy and has order 0; this formula shows that dx itself is not a unit multiple of dy there. Over infinity, x=1/t, dx=−t−2dt and y=w t−(g+1) give dx/y=−tg−1dt/w. In the even case t is a uniformizer and w a unit at p± (step 4.2), so ord⁡p±(dx/y)=g−1; in the odd case t=w2φ(t)−1 gives dt=2wφ(t)−1(1+w2φ(t)−2φ′(t))−1dw, so that dt/w is a unit multiple of dw, and tg−1=w2g−2φ(t)−(g−1) gives ord⁡p∞(dx/y)=2g−2. Hence div⁡(dx/y)=(g−1)(p++p−) in the even case and div⁡(dx/y)=(2g−2)p∞ in the odd case; both divisors have degree 2g−2, and each is a canonical divisor on the smooth proper geometrically integral curve C.

5.3F4F7step 1.2step 2.1step 4.3

The delta invariant at infinity. By [F4] one has pa(X)=g(Xnu)+∑xδx(X), the sum over the closed points of X; since δx vanishes at regular points and ∞ is the only possibly singular point of X (step 2.1), the sum reduces to δ∞, and it is empty when n=3, where ∞ is regular and δ∞=0. With pa(X)=(n−1)(n−2)2 (step 1.2) and g(Xnu)=g(C)=g (step 4.3), δ∞=(n−1)(n−2)2−g, which is 2g2 for n=2g+2, 2g(g−1) for n=2g+1, and 0 for (n,g)=(3,1); in particular it is a nonnegative integer in each family.

6.1F8step 2.2step 3.1step 5.2

Regular differentials. Let ω be a global section of the canonical bundle ωC=ΩC/k1, that is, a regular differential on C [F8]; the zero section is the case R=0 below. If ω≠0, then ω=h ω0 for a unique h∈k(C)× [F8]. Since ω0 has order 0 at every point of the finite chart and generates the free rank-one module ωC,p there (step 5.2), regularity of ω forces h∈OC(U′)=A=k[x,y]/(y2−f) (step 3.1), so h=R(x)+S(x)y for unique R,S∈k[x], the elements 1,y forming a k(x)-basis of k(C) (step 2.2, step 3.1). Regularity on U′ is then automatic, and by [F8] it remains to impose at the points over infinity the condition ord⁡p(h)≥−ord⁡p(ω0) coming from div⁡(ω)=div⁡(h)+div⁡(ω0). In the even case, at p± one has ord⁡(R(x))=−deg⁡R and ord⁡(S(x)y)=−(g+1)−deg⁡S for nonzero R and S, using y=w t−(g+1) with w a unit, while ord⁡p±(ω0)=g−1; hence ord⁡p±(h)≥−(g−1) is required. For S=0 this is exactly deg⁡R≤g−1. For S≠0: if the two orders differ, then ord⁡(h) is the smaller one, and since −(g+1)−deg⁡S≤−(g+1)<−(g−1) this is impossible; if the two orders are equal, so that deg⁡R=g+1+deg⁡S, then the coefficient of t−deg⁡R in h at p± is r+w(p±)s with leading coefficients r,s≠0, and regularity at both p+ and p− would force r+an s=r−an s=0, impossible in characteristic ≠2 with an≠0. Hence S=0 and deg⁡R≤g−1. In the odd case, at p∞ one has ord⁡(R(x))=−2deg⁡R and ord⁡(S(x)y)=−(2g+1)−2deg⁡S for nonzero R and S, while ord⁡p∞(ω0)=2g−2; if S≠0, then −(2g+1)−2deg⁡S≤−2g−1<−(2g−2), so if the orders of the two summands differ the order of h is too small, and they cannot be equal because −2deg⁡R is even while −(2g+1)−2deg⁡S is odd. Hence again S=0, and −2deg⁡R≥−(2g−2) gives deg⁡R≤g−1. Conversely, every R∈k[x] with deg⁡R≤g−1 yields a regular differential R(x) dx/y: it is regular on U′, and at infinity its order is g−1−deg⁡R≥0 in the even case and 2(g−1−deg⁡R)≥0 in the odd case (step 5.2, step 4.2). Therefore H0(C,ωC)={ R(x) dx/y: R∈k[x], deg⁡R≤g−1 }, the differentials dx/y,x dx/y,…,xg−1dx/y are linearly independent over k, and h0(C,ωC)=g.

7.1F3F5F6F8F9F10step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1step 4.2step 5.1step 5.2step 6.1step 4.3step 5.3∎

Conclusion. Step 1.1 shows that the affine curve y2=f(x) is smooth, and step 1.2 and step 2.1 identify the plane model X=V+(G) as an integral plane curve of degree n with pa(X)=(n−1)(n−2)2 whose only possibly singular point is ∞, singular exactly when n≥4. Step 2.2 exhibits the degree-two projection π:C→Pk1 from the normalization, step 3.1 identifies the two standard affine charts with the explicit rings A=k[x,y]/(y2−f) and B=k[t,w]/(w2−ψ), and step 4.1 and step 4.2 compute the ramification over the finite points and over infinity. Step 5.1 shows that π is finite and surjective of degree two, branched exactly at the n roots of f and, when n is odd, at infinity — that is, at 2g+2 branch points — with exactly one ramification point of index two over each of them and two points with e=1 over every other closed point of Pk1. Step 5.2 and step 6.1 compute div⁡(dx/y) and identify H0(C,ωC) with the g-dimensional space of differentials R(x) dx/y with deg⁡R≤g−1, and step 4.3 computes H1(C,OC) from the two affine charts and concludes g(C)=g. Finally step 5.3 computes the delta invariant δ∞=(n−1)(n−2)2−g, equal to 2g2 for n=2g+2, to 2g(g−1) for n=2g+1 and to 0 for (n,g)=(3,1), so that the geometric genus of X is g. The Axiom of Choice is used through the normalization and curve/function-field/finiteness routes [F3], [F5], [F6], the differential and Čech-cohomology routes [F8], [F9], and the properness and ampleness suppliers [F10], at the steps where those inputs are applied.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

272 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources