Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fibre degree sum with ramification and residue degrees

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let f:C→D be a nonconstant morphism of smooth proper geometrically integral curves over a field k, put n=deg⁡(f), and let q be a closed point of D. Then the fibre f−1(q) is finite and ∑p∈f−1(q)ep [κ(p):κ(q)]=n, where ep is the ramification index of f at p.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a nonconstant morphism f:C→D of smooth proper geometrically integral curves over k, n=deg⁡(f), and a closed point q∈D.

[F1]

Under AC, such a morphism is finite and surjective, and its degree definition establishes the weighted fibre formula ∑p∈f−1(q)ord⁡p(f∗tq)[κ(p):κ(q)]=deg⁡(f), where tq is a uniformizer at q. The fibre is finite: on an affine neighbourhood of q it is the spectrum of a finite-dimensional residue-field algebra, whose Artinian decomposition has finitely many local factors. (Degree of a nonconstant morphism of curves)

[F2]

Under the same hypotheses and AC, the ramification index is ep=ord⁡p(f∗tq), independently of the chosen uniformizer. (Ramification index of a morphism of curves)

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the finite curve-map, smooth-curve DVR and algebraic suppliers in [F1] and [F2]. (The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

technique · direct; apply the fibre formula already established in the degree definition, with the ramification-index notation
1.1F1A1

The hypotheses and AC license [F1], so f−1(q) is finite and its weighted order sum equals deg⁡(f)=n.

2.1F2step 1.1∎

At each point p of this finite fibre, [F2] identifies ord⁡p(f∗tq) with ep. Substitution in step 1.1 gives ∑p∈f−1(q)ep[κ(p):κ(q)]=n. This uses no separability assumption and no further Choice.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources