Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Canonical bundle formula with the different

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice where the coherence and differential suppliers require it. Let f ⁣:C→D be a finite surjective morphism of smooth proper geometrically integral curves over a field k with separable function-field extension k(C)/k(D). Then the natural map f∗ωD→ωC induced by differentiation is injective with cokernel ΩC/D, and there is a canonical isomorphism ωC≅f∗ωD⊗OCOC(Rf), equivalently KC is linearly equivalent to f∗KD+Rf for canonical divisors, where Rf is the different divisor of f.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite surjective morphism f ⁣:C→D of smooth proper geometrically integral curves over a field k with separable function-field extension k(C)/k(D); the Axiom of Choice is assumed for the coherence and differential suppliers.

[F1]

A curve over k is geometrically integral, separated, of finite type and of chain dimension one; it is integral and Noetherian. Under Choice, a smooth curve has discrete valuation rings at its closed points, and f finite surjective forces the function-field extension k(C)/k(D) to be finite of degree deg⁡(f)=[k(C):k(D)]≥1. (Curves over a field, Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings, Finite morphisms of schemes, The different divisor of a generically separable morphism of curves)

[F2]

The canonical bundles ωC=ΩC/k and ωD=ΩD/k are invertible O-modules, being locally free of rank one for smooth curves of relative dimension one; a nonzero rational differential ω on C defines the canonical divisor KC=div⁡(ω)=∑xord⁡x(ω)[x], any two canonical divisors differ by a principal divisor, and the rational-section dictionary identifies OC(KC)≅ωC; the pullback f∗ωD of an invertible sheaf along f is invertible. (Canonical bundle and canonical divisors, Differentials of a smooth morphism, Invertible sheaves, Divisors of rational differentials form one linear equivalence class)

[F3]

For the composition C→fD→Spec⁡k the sequence of OC-modules f∗ΩD/k⟶ΩC/k⟶ΩC/D⟶0 is exact, where the first map is the base change of the universal derivation of D/k along f and the second is induced by the universal derivation of C over D; on affine charts it is the transitivity sequence of Kähler differentials, and affineness of f exhibits the charts compatibly with the sheaves of differentials. (Transitivity sequence for differentials, Affine charts recover the algebraic module of differentials, Sheaf of relative Kähler differentials, Relative differentials commute with scheme base change)

[F4]

If the function-field extension k(C)/k(D) is separable, the sheaf ΩC/D of relative differentials is coherent and torsion: it vanishes at the generic point of C, and at every closed point p its stalk is a module of finite length lp=length⁡OC,p(ΩC/D,p) over the discrete valuation ring OC,p, zero for all but finitely many p; moreover lp=0 if and only if ep=1 and the residue extension κ(p)/κ(f(p)) is separable, and the support of ΩC/D is the differential-ramification locus of f. (Local support and index bound for the different of a curve map, Coherent module sheaves, Quasi-coherent module on a scheme)

[F5]

The different divisor of f is the effective divisor Rf=∑plp[p] on C determined by the lengths lp of the relative differentials. (The different divisor of a generically separable morphism of curves, Divisors on a smooth proper curve)

[F6]

Let 0→L→M→Q→0 be an exact sequence of OC-modules with L,M invertible and Q a torsion sheaf of finite length lp at the closed points p and zero generic stalk; then M≅L⊗OCOC(∑plp[p]). (An invertible quotient of an invertible subsheaf by a torsion sheaf is a twist by an effective divisor)

[F7]

The current Cartier interfaces give ωC≅OC(KC) for canonical divisors, identify tensor products with divisor addition, define the pullback Cartier divisor and identify its associated sheaf with the pulled-back line bundle, and identify the kernel of the divisor-to-Picard map with principal Cartier divisors. (Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Linear equivalence cartier divisors, Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors, Addition of Cartier divisors is tensor product of their sheaves, Pullback of a Cartier divisor, Pullback of a Cartier divisor computes the pullback of its line bundle, On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group)

[F8]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed, here inherited from the coherence, differential and divisor suppliers; no further selection is made. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F9]

Under Choice, for a finite dominant morphism between smooth integral curves, over a closed point q the finite local algebra of the source is a torsion-free module over the target DVR OD,q, hence free. The local calculation is given in Degree of a nonconstant morphism of curves. At the generic point the local map is a field extension, so the morphism is flat. (Finite morphisms of schemes, Integral schemes, Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings, Every DVR is a PID, Every finitely generated torsion-free module over a PID is free)

Proof

technique · direct; identify $\omega_C$ and $f^{*}\omega_D$ as the outer terms of the cotangent sequence, show the left map is injective using that its cokernel is a torsion sheaf, and apply the torsion-quotient lemma to obtain the twist by the different
1.1F1F3

The cotangent sequence. Since C and D are curves over the field k, the composition C→fD→Spec⁡k has the exact sequence f∗ΩD/k→ΩC/k→ΩC/D→0 of [F3], and f is finite, hence affine, so the sequence is obtained by gluing its affine chart descriptions and the charts cover C.

2.1F2step 1.1

The two outer sheaves. By [F2] the sheaves ωC=ΩC/k and ωD=ΩD/k are invertible, and the pullback f∗ωD=f∗ΩD/k along the morphism f is again invertible; the middle term of the sequence of step 1.1 is ωC and the left term is f∗ωD.

2.2F4F5step 1.1

The cokernel and the different. The cokernel ΩC/D of the sequence of step 1.1 is, by [F4], a torsion sheaf vanishing at the generic point of the integral curve C, with finite length lp at each closed point p and zero for all but finitely many p, the extension k(C)/k(D) being separable by hypothesis; by [F5] the different divisor is Rf=∑plp[p], an effective divisor on C.

3.1F1F2step 2.1step 2.2

Injectivity of the left map. Let φ ⁣:f∗ωD→ωC be the left map of step 1.1, a morphism between invertible sheaves on the integral curve C by step 2.1. Its cokernel is ΩC/D, which has zero stalk at the generic point η of C by step 2.2, so the stalk φη ⁣:(f∗ωD)η→(ωC)η is surjective; both stalks are one-dimensional over k(C) by [F2], so φη is an isomorphism and in particular nonzero. For each closed point p the localised map φp between the free rank-one modules (f∗ωD)p and (ωC)p over the discrete valuation ring OC,p is multiplication by a nonzero element of OC,p in chosen local frames: it is nonzero because the generic map φη is an isomorphism, and multiplication by a nonzero element of the domain OC,p is injective; hence φp is injective for every closed point p and φ is injective as a morphism of sheaves. Therefore 0→f∗ωD→ωC→ΩC/D→0 is exact, the first assertion of the Statement.

4.1F5F6step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1

The twist. By steps 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1 the exact sequence 0→f∗ωD→ωC→ΩC/D→0 has invertible outer terms and torsion cokernel of finite lengths lp with zero generic stalk, so the torsion-quotient lemma [F6] applies with L=f∗ωD, M=ωC and Q=ΩC/D and gives the canonical isomorphism ωC≅f∗ωD⊗OCOC(∑plp[p])=f∗ωD⊗OCOC(Rf), since ∑plp[p]=Rf by step 2.2. This is the sheaf form of the canonical bundle formula.

5.1F7F9step 4.1

The divisor form. By [F9], f is flat, so the pullback f∗KD is defined by Pullback of a Cartier divisor. Let KC and KD be canonical divisors. The current interfaces [F7] give OC(KC)≅ωC, f∗OD(KD)≅OC(f∗KD), and OC(X+Y)≅OC(X)⊗OC(Y). Applying these to step 4.1 gives OC(KC)≅OC(f∗KD+Rf). Since the kernel of D↦[OC(D)] consists of principal Cartier divisors by [F7], KC and f∗KD+Rf are linearly equivalent.

6.1F4F7F8F9step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

Conclusion. The differential map is injective with cokernel ΩC/D by step 3.1, and step 4.1 gives the canonical-bundle isomorphism; step 5.1 gives its divisor form. Separability is used in step 2.2 through [F4], and the Cartier and pullback interfaces are the current suppliers listed in [F7].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

152 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources