How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Transitivity sequence for differentials
Statement
Let be homomorphisms of commutative rings. Then the sequence of -modules
is exact, where the first map is the extension of scalars of along (so that ) and the second is induced by the universal property of from the -derivation . The first arrow is not asserted injective, and in general it is not injective.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Ring homomorphisms of commutative rings, with universal derivations of , of and of .
Universal property of algebraic differentials: for a ring map and an -module , is an isomorphism , for the pairs , and alike.
Tensoring is right exact: if is exact, then is exact; in particular an extension of scalars of a surjection is surjective and is generated as a -module by the elements .
Differentials of a polynomial quotient and the Jacobian cokernel: for , is free on , and for the quotient formula holds.
Proof
The second map exists by [F1]: is in particular an -derivation, so it induces a -linear with . It is surjective because the elements generate . The composite is zero: on the generators of the first map sends to , and sends that to , since lies in the image of so that is killed by the universal -derivation of . Hence .
For the reverse inclusion put , with quotient map . The -derivation , , kills , since kills the image of the first map; hence by [F1] it induces a -linear with . The map of step 1.1 kills the image of the first map, so it factors as for a -linear , and then is a -linear endomorphism of fixing the generators , so . Symmetrically is a -linear endomorphism of , and the elements generate because the elements generate and is onto, so from we get . Thus is injective, and for we get , hence and . Hence and, with step 1.1, ; moreover .
The first arrow is not injective in general: take a field, , with . By [F3] the source is , while the target is , the universal derivation of a ring over itself being zero. So the first map is zero on a nonzero module, and with steps 1.1 and 2.1 the asserted sequence is exact with a noninjective first arrow.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Algebra 10.131.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vakil §§22.2.9–11, pp.577–579 (standard reference, not scraped)