Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A genus-one curve with a rational point embeds as a plane cubic

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from cohomology, linear systems, smooth-curve DVR and divisor theory, projective-space, affine-dimension, and Bezout suppliers. Let C be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus one over a field k that has a rational point p0 (equivalently, a degree-one divisor), and let L be an invertible sheaf of degree three on C, for instance L=OC(3p0). Then h0(C,L)=3, the sheaf L is very ample, and ϕL:C→Pk2 is a closed immersion whose image is a plane cubic curve, that is, a curve of degree three in Pk2; in particular every genus-one curve with a rational point is isomorphic to a plane cubic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k; a smooth proper geometrically integral curve C over k of genus one with a rational point p0, equivalently a degree-one divisor; an invertible sheaf L of degree three on C.

[F1]

For an invertible sheaf E of degree greater than 2g−2, H1(C,E)=0 and h0(C,E)=deg⁡(E)+1−g. In particular, for g=1 and deg⁡(L)=3, these give H1(C,L)=0 and h0(C,L)=3. (H^1 of a line bundle vanishes above degree 2g - 2, Riemann-Roch in exact form for divisors of degree above 2g - 2)

[F2]

For an invertible sheaf L of degree at least 2g+1 the base-point-free morphism ϕL:C→Pkh0(C,L)−1 is a closed immersion with ϕL∗O(1)≅L, and L is closed H-very ample relative to Spec⁡k; for g=1 and deg⁡(L)=3=2g+1 this applies. (Line bundles of degree at least 2g+1 are very ample, Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention)

[F3]

When the complete linear system ∣L∣ is base-point-free, its section space has dimension h0(C,L)=r+1≥1, its projective dimension is r, and it defines ϕL:C→Pkr with ϕL∗O(1)≅L and with the members of ∣L∣ as pullbacks of hyperplanes; here r=h0(C,L)−1. (A base-point-free linear system defines a morphism to projective space)

[F4]

For a divisor D one has l(D)=dim⁡kL(D)=dim⁡kH0(C,OC(D))=h0(D); on the curve, divisors are finite sums of closed points with additive degree deg⁡k(D)=∑xnx[κ(x):k], and the degree of an invertible sheaf is deg⁡k of any associated divisor. A nonzero rational section of an invertible sheaf determines its Cartier divisor; on a smooth curve its coefficient at a closed point is the order in the local DVR. Principal divisors have degree zero, so this degree is independent of the section. In a DVR, a nonzero local equation is a unit times a uniformizer power, and the length of its quotient is that exponent. (The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D), Degree divisor proper curve, Divisors on a smooth proper curve, Rational section line bundle, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve, Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors, Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings, Principal divisors on a normal proper curve have degree zero, Every nonzero fraction is a unit times a power of a uniformiser, Length and valuation in a DVR)

[F5]

Every closed subscheme of projective space is represented by a unique saturated homogeneous ideal. For an integral image, the homogeneous coordinate ring injects degreewise into the section ring and is a domain. A height-one prime in a finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is principal, and an irreducible homogeneous generator gives the degree of its reduced hypersurface. The projective twisting sheaves multiply as tensor powers, so the section ring used here has the usual graded multiplication. (Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals, Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes, degree projective hypersurface, Invertible twists for degree-one generated rings)

[F6]

If A is a finite-type k-domain, then dim⁡A=trdeg⁡kFrac⁡(A). For a prime ideal p in a finite-type k-domain R, ht⁡(p)+trdeg⁡kFrac⁡(R/p)=trdeg⁡kFrac⁡(R). (Curves over a field, Affine-domain dimension equals transcendence degree, The dimension formula for affine domains)

[F7]

The projective-plane Bezout formula identifies the sum of local intersection lengths weighted by residue degrees with the product of the degrees of two coprime positive-degree homogeneous forms. It holds over any field. (Algebraic Bezout formula as a sum of local scheme lengths)

[F8]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the cohomology, projective-space, dimension, and Bezout suppliers above. (The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

Proof technique: direct; Riemann--Roch and the very-ampleness threshold give the embedding, and the saturated homogeneous ideal, UFD height-one argument, and weighted Bezout identify its scheme-theoretic image as a cubic.

1.1F1F4given

(Degree-one divisor.) A rational point p0 gives the divisor [p0] of degree one. Conversely, let D be any divisor of degree one, not assumed effective. Since 1>2g−2=0, [F1] gives h0(C,OC(D))=l(D)=1. A nonzero section has an effective divisor E linearly equivalent to D; the degree conventions in [F4] give deg⁡k(E)=1. In deg⁡k(E)=∑xnx[κ(x):k], each nx is a nonnegative integer and each residue degree is a positive integer, so E=[p] for one k-rational point p. Thus the parenthetical equivalence in the Statement holds also for signed divisors. The same degree convention gives deg⁡(OC(3p0))=3.

1.2F1given

(Cohomology.) Since deg⁡(L)=3>2g−2=0, [F1] gives H1(C,L)=0 and h0(C,L)=3+1−1=3.

2.1F2F3step 1.2

(Very ampleness.) The degree satisfies deg⁡(L)=3=2g+1, so [F2] applies. The complete linear system morphism of [F3] is a closed immersion ϕL:C→Pkh0(C,L)−1=Pk2 and ϕL∗O(1)≅L.

3.1F3F5step 2.1

(The homogeneous ideal of the image.) Put Y=ϕL(C), R=k[X0,X1,X2], and let J⊂R be the unique saturated homogeneous ideal with Y=V+(J), given by [F5]. The scheme Y is integral because it is isomorphic to C. For every degree, restriction to Y embeds S=R/J into the section ring ⨁n≥0H0(Y,OY(n)): a homogeneous form maps to its restricted section, and if that section is zero then it vanishes on every standard projective chart, so the saturation criterion in [F5] puts the form in J. The section ring is a domain: a nonzero section of an invertible sheaf on an integral scheme remains nonzero at the generic point, since on a trivializing affine open its coefficient belongs to a domain embedded in the function field. At the generic point, the product of two nonzero homogeneous sections is the tensor product of two nonzero vectors over k(Y), hence is nonzero; the grading then shows that products of arbitrary nonzero sums are nonzero by considering their least nonzero degrees. Thus S is a domain and J is prime. Each coordinate section is a nonzero member of the basis defining the complete linear system, so Xi∉J.

4.1F5F6step 3.1

(The homogeneous ideal has height one.) Fix an index i and write A=(SXi)0. This is the coordinate ring of the nonempty affine chart Y∩D+(Xi); it is a finite-type domain of dimension one because Y is an integral curve. Since S is standard graded and Xi has degree one, SXi≅A[Xi,Xi−1]: a homogeneous fraction is its degree-zero part times the corresponding power of Xi, and the grading makes this decomposition direct. Therefore trdeg⁡kFrac⁡(S)=2 by [F6]. Apply the dimension formula of [F6] to J⊂R; it gives ht⁡(J)+2=3, so J has height one. By [F5], J=(F) for an irreducible element F. Because J is homogeneous, each homogeneous component of F belongs to (F). If F had more than one degree, a nonzero component of degree smaller than deg⁡F would equal FG for some polynomial G, which is impossible by additivity of total degree in the polynomial domain. Thus F is homogeneous. Therefore Y=V+(F) scheme-theoretically, and F is square-free.

5.1F4F5F7step 4.1

(The degree.) The irreducible homogeneous form F has positive degree, and [F5] identifies the degree of its reduced hypersurface with deg⁡F. Choose a linear form ℓ whose restriction to Y is nonzero; when deg⁡F=1, choose one not proportional to F, and when deg⁡F>1 any nonzero linear form is coprime to F. The zero scheme of s=ℓ∣C∈H0(C,L) is scheme-theoretically Y∩V+(ℓ) under ϕL. For each closed point x in that intersection, the local ring of C is a DVR by [F4]. If the local equation of s is utn with u a unit and t a uniformizer, then length⁡OC,xOC,x/(s)=n, exactly the coefficient of the zero divisor of s. Consequently the weighted sum of the intersection lengths in [F7] is deg⁡(L)=3 by [F4]. The forms F and ℓ are coprime, so the same sum is deg⁡(F) by [F7]. Hence deg⁡(F)=3, and Y is a plane cubic as claimed.

6.1F1F2F3F5F6F7F8step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 5.1∎

The very ample sheaf L embeds every given genus-one curve into Pk2 as a scheme-theoretic cubic by steps 1.2, 2.1, and 3.1--5.1. Taking L=OC(3p0) when a rational point is given proves that every such curve is isomorphic to a plane cubic. The Axiom of Choice is inherited through the cohomology, projective-space, affine-dimension, and Bezout suppliers cited above; no unmentioned rational intersection points are chosen.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

175 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources