Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Line bundles of degree at least 2g+1 are very ample

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the duality and projective-space suppliers. Let C be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over a field k of genus g and let L be an invertible OC-module with deg⁡(L)≥2g+1. Then L is very ample: L is closed H-very ample relative to Spec⁡k in the sense of Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention, and the base-point-free morphism ϕL:C⟶Pkh0(C,L)−1 of A base-point-free linear system defines a morphism to projective space is a closed immersion with ϕL∗O(1)≅L.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k; a smooth proper geometrically integral curve C over k of genus g; an invertible OC-module L with deg⁡(L)≥2g+1; an algebraic closure kˉ and the base change Ckˉ.

[F1]

If an invertible sheaf E on a smooth proper curve of genus g has deg⁡(E)>2g−2, then H1(C,E)=0 and h0(C,E)=deg⁡(E)+1−g. Over k this applies to L. After extension to kˉ, it applies to twists by geometric points once their degrees are computed in [F6]. It does not assert vanishing for twists by arbitrary closed points over k, whose residue degrees may be large. (H^1 of a line bundle vanishes above degree 2g - 2, Riemann-Roch in exact form for divisors of degree above 2g - 2, Degree divisor proper curve)

[F2]

After base change to kˉ, each closed point p is rational. The one-point sequence 0→Lkˉ(−p)→Lkˉ→Lkˉ∣p→0 is supplied by The exact sequence for adding one point to a divisor. Iterating it gives the restriction sequences for p+q and 2p. Since OCkˉ,p is a DVR with maximal ideal (t) and Lkˉ is free of rank one at p, the double-point quotient is Lkˉ,p/t2Lkˉ,p, a two-dimensional kˉ-space with basis the value and the first-order class. For p≠q the quotient is Lkˉ∣p⊕Lkˉ∣q, also two-dimensional. (The exact sequence for adding one point to a divisor, Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings)

[F3]

Since deg⁡(L)≥2g+1≥2g, the sheaf L is base-point-free: the complete linear system ∣L∣ has no base point and the evaluation morphism OCh0(C,L)→L is surjective. (Line bundles of degree at least 2g are base-point-free)

[F4]

The complete linear system defines ϕL:C→Pkh0(C,L)−1 with ϕL∗O(1)≅L. Projective space is proper, hence separated, over k; since C is proper, ϕL is proper by Morphisms from a proper scheme to a separated one are proper. Its base change is proper by Properness survives arbitrary base change. (A base-point-free linear system defines a morphism to projective space, Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base, Proper morphisms, Relative projective space from standard charts, Properness survives arbitrary base change)

[F5]

At a rational point over kˉ, the intrinsic tangent space is the dual of the cotangent space m/m2 (The intrinsic Zariski tangent space). A tangent map is injective exactly when the induced cotangent map is surjective. For the smooth curve source, m/m2 is one-dimensional by the DVR description in [F2].

[F6]

Degree after arbitrary field extension. Let K/k be any field extension and let x be a closed point of C, with finite residue field E=κ(x). The pullback point scheme is xK=Spec⁡(E⊗kK). A finite k-basis of E tensors to a K-basis, so this finite-dimensional K-algebra has dimension [E:k] and is Artinian: a descending chain of ideals is a descending chain of finite-dimensional K-subspaces and therefore stabilizes. By the structure theorem for Artinian rings, it is the finite product of its localizations at its maximal ideals. Write E⊗kK=∏yAy over those factors. Each Ay is an Artinian local ring, so its regular module has finite composition length. Every simple factor is its residue field κ(y), and additivity of K-dimension along that composition series gives dim⁡KAy=length⁡Ay(Ay)[κ(y):K]. The dimension of a finite product is the sum of the dimensions of its factors, so [E:k]=∑ylength⁡Ay(Ay)[κ(y):K]. The projection CK→C is flat: K is flat over k by Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms, and flatness of morphisms is preserved by base change. The closed point x is an effective Cartier divisor on the smooth curve; its pullback is xK. At each y, the local ring of CK is a DVR, and if a local equation for xK has order e, its quotient has length e. Thus the coefficient of y in the pulled-back divisor is length⁡Ay(Ay), and deg⁡K(xK)=∑ylength⁡Ay(Ay)[κ(y):K]=[E:k]=deg⁡k(x). By additivity, deg⁡K(DK)=deg⁡k(D) for every divisor D=∑xnx[x], with no separability hypothesis and including negative coefficients. Every invertible sheaf is OC(D) for a divisor D by taking a nonzero rational section. Flat pullback gives OCK(DK)≅OC(D)K; the Cartier/Weil identification and the degree homomorphism on the Picard group therefore give deg⁡(FK)=deg⁡(F) for every invertible sheaf F on C. In particular this holds for K=kˉ. (Degree divisor proper curve, Divisors on a smooth proper curve, Flat morphism of schemes, Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms, Flatness is stable under arbitrary base change, Modules over a field are projective, flat, and injective, Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings, An Artinian ring is canonically the finite product of its localizations at its maximal ideals, A commutative ring is Artinian exactly when it has finite length as a module over itself, Length and valuation in a DVR, Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors, Pullback of a Cartier divisor, Pullback of a Cartier divisor computes the pullback of its line bundle, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve, The degree of a divisor descends to the Picard group of a normal proper curve)

[F7]

For a field extension K/k and coherent F on C, Hq(CK,FK)≅Hq(C,F)⊗kK. Thus the genus and dimensions of global sections are preserved. A nonzero k-module stays nonzero after tensoring with K: a one-dimensional subspace injects into it after tensoring because K is flat over k, and that subspace becomes K. Right exactness of tensoring identifies the scalar extension of a cokernel with the cokernel of the scalar-extended map. (Flat field extension commutes with coherent cohomology, Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms, Modules over a field are projective, flat, and injective, Tensoring is right exact)

[F8]

A proper quasi-finite morphism is finite. A finite injective ring map is integral, so every point of its target affine scheme has a point above it by lying over. Affine ring maps are surjective exactly for affine closed immersions, and closed immersions are local on the target. If a finite module is nonzero, a maximal ideal contains the annihilator of a nonzero element; a maximal ideal is a closed point. (A proper quasi-finite morphism is finite, Lying over for integral ring maps, Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change, Closed immersions are local on the target, Closed immersions of schemes, Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma, In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal)

[F9]

The arbitrary-field curve-image route uses the following suppliers: curves are integral finite-type schemes of chain dimension one (Curves over a field); scheme-theoretic images of quasi-compact morphisms exist and restrict to opens as stated (Scheme-theoretic image, Scheme-theoretic image of a quasi-compact morphism); for an integral finite-type scheme, its generic stalk is the fraction field of every nonempty affine chart and that field is finitely generated over the base (Function field of an integral finite-type scheme); a finite-type domain A over a field satisfies dim⁡A=trdeg⁡kFrac⁡(A) (Affine-domain dimension equals transcendence degree); proper closed subsets of a finite-type integral curve are finite sets of closed points (Proper closed subsets of a curve are finite); a closed point of a finite-type k-scheme has finite residue degree over k (Finite-type maps from Jacobson rings induce finite residue-field extensions at maximal ideals); and for a finite-type map, quasi-finiteness is equivalent to each point being isolated in its fibre with finite residue extension (Finite-fibre and pointwise characterizations of quasi-finiteness). The local ring at a closed point of a smooth curve is a DVR (Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings). The finitely generated function field and finite algebraic-generation steps use Finitely generated field extensions F(a1,…,ar) and An extension generated by finitely many algebraic elements is finite. The image route is spelled out in step 3.3; no separability or residue-field-degree-one hypothesis is used. [given]

[F10]

Closed H-very ampleness relative to Spec⁡k means the existence of a closed immersion i:C→Pkn with L≅i∗OPkn(1). (Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention)

[F11]

The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

Proof technique: direct; preserve degree under base change, separate geometric points and first jets, then prove the closed-immersion conclusion by finite local algebra and faithfully flat descent.

1.1F1F3F4given

(Set-up over k.) The high-degree formula and basepoint-free system apply. [F1, F3, F4, given] Write d=deg⁡(L). Then d≥2g+1>2g−2, so [F1] applies to L. Over k, the complete linear system is base-point-free and defines the proper morphism f=ϕL:C→Pkh0(C,L)−1 with f∗O(1)≅L. No vanishing claim for twists by arbitrary k-closed points is needed.

2.1F6F7step 1.1

(Base change and degrees.) Put K=kˉ; degree, genus, and section dimensions are preserved. [F6, F7, step 1.1] Thus deg⁡(LK)=d even if closed residue extensions over k are inseparable; by [F7], g(CK)=g and h0(CK,LK)=h0(C,L). Every closed point of CK is K-rational. From this step on, the point, pair, and double-point twists are only by such geometric points, so each subtracts degree one (twice for a length-two divisor); the high-degree vanishing below is applied on CK.

3.1F1F2step 2.1

(Separate distinct geometric points.) [F1, F2, step 2.1] Restriction onto p+q is surjective. Let p≠q be closed points of CK. By [F2], restriction to the effective divisor p+q gives 0→LK(−p−q)→LK→Qp+q→0 with H0(Qp+q)=LK∣p⊕LK∣q≅K2. Its twist has degree d−2≥2g−1>2g−2, so [F1] gives H1(CK,LK(−p−q))=0. The long exact cohomology sequence therefore makes H0(CK,LK)→H0(Qp+q) surjective. Sections can take independently prescribed values at p and q, so fK separates these points.

3.2F1F2F5step 2.1

(Separate tangent directions.) [F1, F2, F5, step 2.1] Restriction to 2p separates the value and first jet. Let p be a closed point of CK, with uniformizer t in the DVR OCK,p, and choose a local frame e of LK. By [F2], the double-point quotient LK/LK(−2p)≅LK,p/t2LK,p has basis e,te. The restriction map on global sections is surjective: the twist has degree d−2≥2g−1>2g−2, so H1(CK,LK(−2p))=0 by [F1]. Choose global sections s0,s1 whose images are e and te, respectively. Then s0 is nonzero at p, and in the projective chart defined by s0 the ratio satisfies s1/s0≡t(modt2). Its differential at p is nonzero, so the tangent map of fK is injective there.

3.3F4F6F8F9step 2.1

(Finiteness after base change; arbitrary-field route.) We prove the needed finiteness route for a map g:X→PFr over any field F, where X is a smooth proper integral curve and M=g∗O(1) has positive degree. It will apply to fK here and to f over k in step 5.1. By A base-point-free linear system defines a morphism to projective space and [F4], the map in each of these applications is proper and finite type. Its scheme-theoretic image Y↪PFr exists by [F9]. The scheme-image theorem shows that g(X) is dense in Y: otherwise a nonempty open in Y disjoint from g(X) would restrict the scheme-theoretic image to the empty image of the empty source, contradicting that this open is nonempty. On every standard affine chart V=Spec⁡R of projective space, the restriction of Y is Spec⁡(R/I), where I=ker⁡(R→Γ(g−1V,OX)). If the preimage is nonempty, it is an integral finite-type open of X, and its global functions embed in F(X) by [F9]. Hence I is prime. Thus Y is reduced; its underlying space is the closure of the image of the irreducible space X, so Y is irreducible and therefore integral. The image Y cannot be a single point: in that case g factors through Y=Spec⁡E for a field E, the invertible sheaf O(1)∣Y is free of rank one over E, and its pullback M is OX, contrary to deg⁡(M)>0. Choose a point of Y other than its generic point and an affine open Spec⁡A⊆Y containing it. This open also contains the generic point; since Y is integral, the chosen point corresponds to a nonzero prime of the finite-type domain A. Therefore dim⁡A≥1, and [F9] gives trdeg⁡FF(Y)≥1. The same affine-domain dimension result shows trdeg⁡FF(X)=1: choose a strict length-one chain Z0⊊X of nonempty irreducible closed subsets and a point x∈Z0. This point is nongeneric and hence closed by [F9]. In an affine neighborhood Spec⁡B of x, its local DVR gives dim⁡B≥1; any chain in this affine open remains strict after closure in X, so dim⁡B≤1. Dominance gives an injection F(Y)↪F(X) on generic stalks, whence trdeg⁡FF(Y)=1 as well. Take a standard projective affine chart containing the generic point of Y. Its coordinate ratios generate F(Y), so at least one, say h, is transcendental over F. By [F9], F(X)/F is finitely generated. Since trdeg⁡FF(X)=trdeg⁡FF(h)=1, each member of a finite generating list for F(X)/F(h) is algebraic over F(h); the finite-algebraic-generation theorem in [F9] gives [F(X):F(h)]<∞. Thus F(X)/F(Y) is finite, with no separability assumption. For the fibre criterion, every point of X is generic or closed by [F9]. If a closed point x mapped to the generic point of Y, the field map F(Y)→κ(x) would embed a field of transcendence degree one into κ(x), which is finite over F by [F9]; this is impossible. The generic fibre therefore has the single point ηX. On affine neighborhoods Spec⁡A⊆Y and Spec⁡B⊆g−1(Spec⁡A) of the generic points, the dominance map makes A→B injective and its coordinate ring is the localization B⊗AF(Y), a domain with one prime, hence a field. Its fraction field is F(X), so the generic fibre is Spec⁡F(X), finite over Spec⁡F(Y). For any nongeneric point y∈Y, the closed set {y}‾ is proper; its preimage is a proper closed subset of X because g(X) is dense in Y. By [F9] it is a finite set of closed points. In particular every closed-point fibre is finite; each point in it is isolated, and its residue extension over κ(y) is finite because κ(x)/F is finite and κ(y) embeds in κ(x). Thus every point of X is isolated in its fibre with finite residue extension. The quasi-finite fibre criterion in [F9] makes g quasi-finite, and proper plus quasi-finite is finite by [F8]. Applying this argument over F=K proves that fK is finite. The field extensions above may be inseparable; only their finiteness is used.

4.1F5F8F11step 3.1step 3.2step 3.3

(Local ring surjectivity over K.) We prove that fK is a closed immersion. Fix an affine chart U=Spec⁡R⊆PKh0(C,L)−1. Since fK is finite, its inverse image is affine, say Spec⁡S, with S finite over R. Let A be the image of R→S, so A↪S and Spec⁡A is the scheme-theoretic image on this chart. Since S is finite over R and the R-action factors through A, the same module generators make S finite over A. For a closed point y∈Spec⁡A, lying over gives at least one source point because A↪S is integral, and separation in step 3.1 gives at most one; call the unique point x, with corresponding prime n⊂S. Write my for the maximal ideal of y and z for its corresponding closed point in the ambient chart U. Both residue fields are K. Set Sy=S⊗AAmy. Since S is finite over A, Sy is integral and finite over Amy; its maximal ideals correspond exactly to primes of S over my. There is only n, so Sy is local. It is therefore already its localization at that maximal ideal and equals Sn=OCK,x. Localization preserves finite modules, so B:=OCK,x is finite over Amy. The tangent map at x is injective by step 3.2; by [F5] its dual cotangent map is surjective. The local map OPKr,z→Amy→B factors that cotangent map, so mAmy/mAmy2→mB/mB2 is surjective. The latter space is one-dimensional because B is a DVR. Hence some element of mAmy maps to a uniformizer modulo mB2, and therefore mAmyB=mB. The residue fields agree, so B=Amy+mAmyB. The finite Amy-module B/Amy consequently satisfies B/Amy=mAmy(B/Amy); Nakayama's lemma gives B=Amy. This holds at every closed point y. The finite cokernel S/A must vanish: if nonzero, choose a nonzero element s and, by [F8], a maximal ideal m containing its proper annihilator. The localization s/1 is nonzero in (S/A)m, since otherwise some u∉m would annihilate s, contradicting Ann⁡(s)⊆m. This contradicts the local surjectivity just proved. Thus R→S is surjective on every affine chart. The affine quotient description in [F8] proves that fK is a closed immersion.

5.1F4F7F8step 4.1

(Descend the closed immersion.) [F4, F7, F8, F9, step 3.3, step 4.1] The arbitrary-field argument of step 3.3 applies to f over k, so f is proper quasi-finite and finite by [F8]. For an affine chart Spec⁡R⊆Pkh0(C,L)−1, write its finite inverse image as Spec⁡S. The closed immersion fK makes R⊗kK→S⊗kK surjective. By right exactness in [F7], the cokernel of R→S tensors to zero over K. A nonzero k-module contains a one-dimensional k-subspace whose injection remains injective after tensoring with the flat extension K/k, and that subspace becomes K≠0; therefore the cokernel itself is zero. Thus R→S is surjective for every affine chart. The affine quotient criterion and target locality in [F8] show that f is a closed immersion.

6.1F9F10F11step 5.1∎

(Very ampleness.) [F10, F11, step 5.1] Since f∗O(1)≅L, the closed immersion of step 5.1 exhibits L as closed H-very ample relative to Spec⁡k by [F10]. The Axiom of Choice [F11] is used through the stated suppliers, including the maximal-ideal step in 4.1; no choice is used to alter the degree or field scope.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

304 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources