Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-fibre and pointwise characterizations of quasi-finiteness

Statement

Let f:X→S be a finite-type morphism, with quasi-finiteness as defined on this page. The following are equivalent: (1) f is quasi-finite; (2) every x∈X is isolated in the fibre Xf(x) and κ(x)/κ(f(x)) is finite; (3) for every s∈S the fibre morphism Xs→Spec⁡κ(s) is finite.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite-type morphism f:X→S, a point x∈X with image s=f(x), and the definitions of quasi-finiteness and scheme-theoretic fibre.

[F1]

A scheme morphism is quasi-finite when it is finite type and each point has compatible affine neighbourhoods on which the ring map is quasi-finite at the corresponding prime; the local fibre algebra is Bq/pBq (Quasi-finite morphisms of schemes).

[F2]

For a finite-type ring map A→B and q over p, quasi-finiteness at q means that Bq/pBq is finite-dimensional over κ(p) (Quasi-finiteness at a prime of a finite-type algebra).

[F3]

A morphism is of finite type when it is locally of finite type and quasi-compact (Locally finite type and finite type morphisms).

[F4]

The scheme-theoretic fibre is Xs=X×SSpec⁡κ(s) (Scheme-theoretic fibre).

[F5]

A morphism to an affine target is finite when its inverse image is affine and its coordinate algebra is a finite module over the target ring (Finite morphisms of schemes).

[F6]

Arbitrary base change preserves finite-type morphisms (Finite type under base change and products over a field).

[F7]

A polynomial algebra over a field is Noetherian by Hilbert's basis theorem. Its quotients and localizations have finitely generated ideals: lift an ideal to the polynomial ring for a quotient, and contract it then localize for a localization. Only Noetherian-to-finite-generation and its choice-free converse are used, not the maximal-condition implication. Hilbert basis theorem: if R is Noetherian then R[x] is Noetherian A commutative ring is Noetherian exactly when every ideal is finitely generated, exactly when its ideals satisfy the ascending chain condition, and exactly when every nonempty set of ideals has a maximal member

[F8]

A nonzero finite-type field algebra is module-finite over an injected polynomial subring. If a finite module M satisfies IM=M, the determinant trick gives (1−a)M=0 for some a∈I, without a choice assumption. Noether normalisation yields module finiteness over a polynomial subring Determinant trick for Nakayama

Proof

Proof technique: direct; prove the finite local fibre criterion and the finite disjoint affine decomposition, retaining the unconditional axiom scope of the Statement.

1.1F8givenconstructalgebra

We first record a choice-free existence fact used only for finite-type field algebras. A nonzero finite-type k-algebra T has a maximal ideal. By [F8] it is module-finite over an injected polynomial ring R=k[z1,…,zd]. Localize at the explicit maximal ideal m=(z1,…,zd). The injection Rm↪Tm shows the latter is nonzero and finite as an Rm-module. If mTm=Tm, the determinant trick in [F8] gives (1−a)Tm=0 with a∈mRm; 1−a is a unit in this localization, a contradiction. Hence T/mT is a nonzero finite-dimensional k-algebra. Among its proper ideals choose one of maximum vector-space dimension; such a dimension is a largest member of a nonempty finite subset of the natural numbers. That ideal is maximal, and its inverse image in T is maximal. Only finitely many choices and finite-dimensional linear algebra occur.

2.1F7algebrastep 1.1

For a finite-type k-algebra A, its nilradical is the intersection of its prime ideals without requiring the general prime-ideal theorem. Indeed, if a is not nilpotent, the nonzero finite-type algebra A[a−1] has a maximal ideal by step 1.1; its contraction is prime and avoids a. The reverse inclusion, that every prime contains each nilpotent, follows by taking a power. By [F7] the nilradical is finitely generated, say by ai with aini=0, and is nilpotent: every monomial of degree ∑ini in the ai contains a vanishing power. Thus if A has just one prime, its maximal ideal is nilpotent. The zero ring is excluded only while a prime is being considered.

3.1F7algebrastep 2.1

Let D be a finite-type k-algebra and q∈Spec⁡D. Suppose Dq is finite-dimensional over k. Its residue field is finite-dimensional. The domain D/q injects into that field, hence is itself finite-dimensional; multiplication by a nonzero element is an injective endomorphism of a finite-dimensional space and is surjective, so this domain is a field. Thus q is maximal. Every prime quotient of the finite-dimensional algebra Dq is similarly a field, so its only prime is its unique maximal ideal qDq. By step 2.1 this ideal is nilpotent. Since D is Noetherian by [F7], choose generators of qN for a power that becomes zero in Dq. Each is annihilated by some element outside q; their finite product s∉q kills all of qN. Every prime of Ds contains qDs, since its Nth power vanishes, and maximality of q leaves precisely that one prime. Consequently D(s)={q} in Spec⁡D. This proves isolatedness and finite residue field from finite-dimensionality of the local algebra.

3.2F7algebrastep 1.1step 2.1

Conversely suppose q is isolated and its residue field is finite over k. Choose a principal neighbourhood D(s)={q}. The finite-type algebra A=Ds has just that prime. It is local: if an element outside that prime were not a unit, its nonzero finite-type quotient would have a maximal ideal by step 1.1, yielding a second prime. Thus A=Dq. By step 2.1 its maximal ideal n is nilpotent. All powers of n are finitely generated by [F7], so the quotients ni/ni+1 are finite-dimensional over A/n=κ(q): the images of finite ideal generators span them. This residue field is finite over k by hypothesis. The finite filtration by the powers ending at nN=0 proves that A=Dq is finite-dimensional over k. This proves the reverse local criterion, including nilpotents.

4.1F1F2F3F4F5F6algebrastep 3.1step 3.2

For x∈Xs, a compatible finite-type affine chart has fibre algebra D=B⊗Aκ(s) and its local ring at x is Bq/pBq by [F1], [F2] and [F4]. Steps 3.1–3.2 identify finite-dimensionality of this ring with isolatedness and finite residue extension in that affine fibre chart, hence in Xs. This is an open-local assertion. Definitions [F1]–[F3] therefore give (1)⟺(2). If these hold, every point of Xs has a singleton principal affine neighbourhood whose coordinate ring is its finite-dimensional local ring, by step 3.2. Those opens cover the fibre. Its quasi-compactness follows from finite type and [F6], so finitely many suffice. They are disjoint singleton opens, and their finite disjoint union is the spectrum of the finite product of their finite-dimensional algebras. Thus Xs is affine finite-dimensional over κ(s), proving (3) by [F5]. No separation hypothesis is used in this disjoint open cover.

4.2F4F5algebrastep 3.1

Conversely assume (3). Write Xs=Spec⁡D with D finite-dimensional over κ(s) by [F5]. Every localization Dq is still finite-dimensional. To see this explicitly, for each inverted element b∉q take a polynomial relation brg(b)=0 with g(0)≠0; one exists by finite-dimensional linear dependence and removal of the largest power of the variable. After inverting b one has g(b)=0, so b−1 is a polynomial in b using the nonzero constant coefficient. Hence the localization map D→Dq is surjective and its target is finite-dimensional. Step 3.1 gives isolatedness and finite residue extension for each point, proving (2). An empty fibre is Spec⁡(0) and is finite; its pointwise conditions are vacuous.

5.1F7F8algebrastep 4.1step 4.2∎

Step 4.1 proves (1)⟺(2) and (1)⟹(3); step 4.2 proves (3)⟹(2). These give all claimed equivalences. The Noetherian and normalization suppliers in [F7]–[F8] use only their choice-free finite-generation implications and finite selections; step 1.1 explicitly replaces a general maximal-ideal existence appeal. No choice principle or external Stacks proof is an input.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources