Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Tame symbol reciprocity in dimension two (the Key Lemma)

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) inherited from the proper/quasi-finite and scheme base-change suppliers. Let A be a two-dimensional local domain essentially of finite type over a field and f,g∈Frac⁡(A)×. For each height-one prime q, define ∂q(f,g) by normalization and norms of the DVR symbols (−1)v(f)v(g)fv(g)/gv(f) reduced in the residue fields. Then ∑qord⁡A/q(∂q(f,g))=0. The difference between two orders of rational-section intersection is consequently a sum of divisors of these symbols; for two section zero schemes the relations can be chosen on their common intersection. This proves well-definedness of first Chern operators and Cartier Gysin on rational equivalence and commutation of two Cartier Gysins.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice; a two-dimensional local domain A, essentially of finite type over a field, with fraction field K=Frac⁡(A), maximal ideal m, and nonzero f,g∈K×; for each height-one prime q⊆A the one-dimensional local domain A/q with fraction field κ(q).

[F1]

A two-dimensional local domain essentially of finite type over a field is Noetherian, and its normalization B is a finite A-module and a semilocal normal domain; every local ring of a normal one-dimensional Noetherian domain at a height-one prime is a discrete valuation ring (A finite-type domain over a field has finite normalization, Height-one localizations of normal Noetherian domains are DVRs).

[F2]

The order function of a one-dimensional Noetherian local domain is multiplicative, additive and computed by lengths; it agrees with the normalized valuation on a discrete valuation ring (The order function of a one-dimensional Noetherian local domain). Length is additive in short exact sequences, and the invariant of a two-periodic complex is defined whenever its two homology modules have finite length (Module length is additive in short exact sequences).

[F3]

For a finite extension of one-dimensional local domains, the norm-order formula computes the order of a norm, with residue-field degree weights (Proper pushforward of cycles and the norm formula).

Proof

technique · direct; introduce the two-periodic invariant $e(M,a,b)$, compute it on finite-length and nilpotent modules, identify it with the order of the tame symbol on a lattice, and sum over height-one primes using normalization
1.1F2givenalgebra

The invariant and its basic properties. For a module M over a commutative ring with commuting endomorphisms a,b satisfying abM=baM=0, whose two-periodic complex has finite-length homology, set e(M,a,b)=ℓ(ker⁡a/bM)−ℓ(ker⁡b/aM), where the lengths are taken over the ring acting; both terms are finite by [F2] and the finite-homology hypothesis. If 0→M′→M→M′′→0 is a short exact sequence of such complexes, the long exact homology sequence together with additivity of length shows e(M,a,b)=e(M′,a,b)+e(M′′,a,b). If M has finite length, then ℓker⁡a=ℓM−ℓ(aM) and ℓker⁡b=ℓM−ℓ(bM) by [F2], and substitution gives e(M,a,b)=0.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

The nilpotent identity. Let t be an endomorphism of M with tNM=0 for some N≥1 and assume ker⁡(t)/tN−1M has finite length; consider the pair (a,b)=(ti,tN−i) for 0≤i≤N, so that ab=0. Put Ki=ker⁡ti and let ai=ℓ(Ki/tN−iM), bi=ℓ(Ki/tKi+1), ci=ℓ(K1/tiKi+1), lengths over the ring acting. The quotients K1/tiKi+1 have finite length, since tN−1M⊆tiKi+1. The identities Ki∩tjM=tjKi+j produce the two exact sequences 0→K1/tN−i−1KN−i→Ki+1/tN−i−1M→tKi/tN−iM→Ki/tKi+1→0 and 0→Ki/tKi+1→Ki+1/tKi+2→tiK1/ti+1Ki+2→K1/tiKi+1→0; these sequences inductively show that all ai,bi are finite (starting with a1=ℓ(K1/tN−1M)), and length additivity gives cN−i−1−ai+1+ai−bi=0 and bi−bi+1+ci+1−ci=0, and with b0=c0=0 the second relation gives bi=ci for all i, whence ai+1−ai=bN−i−1−bi by the first; summing over i yields ai=aN−i, which is exactly e(M,ti,tN−i)=0.

3.1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Multiplier identities. Let M be a finite module over a Noetherian local ring, with commuting endomorphisms a,b,x, abM=0, finite-length x-power torsion, and M/xM supported at the closed point. Removing that torsion leaves x injective, so ker⁡(xa)=ker⁡a and the exact sequence 0→aM/xaM→ker⁡b/xaM→ker⁡b/aM→0 gives e(M,xa,b)=e(M,a,b)−e(aM,0,x); the same argument gives e(M,a,xb)=e(M,a,b)+e(bM,0,x). If N is supported at the closed point and a height-one prime q of a two-dimensional local domain R, with x∉q, then eR(N,0,x)=ℓRq(Nq)ord⁡R/q(x). Indeed, additivity and a finite filtration by powers of q reduce to a finite module over the one-dimensional local domain R/q; its finite-length torsion contributes zero by step 1.1. The torsion-free quotient is a full lattice of rank h=ℓRq(Nq), and there e(N,0,x)=ℓ(N/xN)=ord⁡R/q(det⁡(xid⁡))=hord⁡R/q(x) by the lattice-index calculation in [F3]. Now let M also satisfy Mq≅Rq/(πe+f) and a=uπe, b=vπf in Rq, with π a uniformizer and u,v units. The nilpotent identity gives e(M,πe,πf)=0, while πeM and πfM have generic lengths f and e. If π,u,v∈R, the multiplier identities yield eR(M,a,b)=−ford⁡R/q(u)+eord⁡R/q(v)=−ord⁡R/q((−1)efufv−e). For parameters initially in Rq, first replace π,u,v by cπ,c−eu,c−fv for some c∈R∖q so cπ∈R, then choose d∈R∖q with du,dv∈R and apply the formula to da,db. The multiplier identities account for the factors eR(aM,0,d) and eR(bM,0,d), whose generic lengths are f and e; these are exactly the order correction from scaling the tame symbol by df−e. Thus the formula also holds for the original a,b∈R.

4.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

The normal case. Suppose first that A is normal, so each height-one localization Aq is a discrete valuation ring by [F1]. Let q1,…,qt be the height-one primes containing ab. Set M=A/(ab) and let Mi be the image of M in Mqi=Aqi/(ab). The kernel and cokernel of M→⨁iMi are supported only at the maximal ideal, hence have finite length. Since a,b are nonzerodivisors on A, cancellation gives ker⁡(a:M→M)=bM and ker⁡(b:M→M)=aM, so eA(M,a,b)=0. Step 1.1 and additivity therefore give ∑ieA(Mi,a,b)=0. Write a=uiπiei and b=viπifi in Aqi, with πi a uniformizer and ui,vi units. The module Mi has generic length ei+fi at qi; the modules πieiMi and πifiMi have generic lengths fi and ei, respectively. Here πiei+fi annihilates Mi, and ker⁡(πi)/πiei+fi−1Mi is supported only at the maximal ideal, hence has finite length: its localization at qi is zero by the DVR computation and Mi has no other height-one support. Thus the nilpotent identity of step 2.1 applies. The multiplier identities of step 3.1 then give eA(Mi,a,b)=−fiord⁡A/qi(ui)+eiord⁡A/qi(vi)=−ord⁡A/qi(∂Aqi(a,b)), because ∂Aqi(a,b)=(−1)eifiuifi/viei in Frac⁡(A/qi) and the sign is a unit. Summing over i proves ∑qord⁡A/q(∂Aq(a,b))=0 for normal A and a,b∈A.

5.1F1F3step 4.1algebra

The non-normal case. For general A, let B be the finite normalization of A, a semilocal normal Noetherian domain by [F1], with maximal ideals n and residue fields κ(n) finite over κ(m). By step 4.1 applied to each local factor Bn, ∑Q⊆nord⁡(B/Q)n(∂Q(f,g))=0 for the height-one primes Q of B inside n; multiplying by [κ(n):κ(m)] and summing over n, the norm-order formula of [F3] identifies the sum over the height-one primes Q above a fixed height-one prime q of A with ord⁡A/q(∏Q∣qNκ(Q)/κ(q)∂Q(f,g)), which is the normalizing definition of ∂q(f,g). Hence the weighted sum of the local identities is exactly ∑qord⁡A/q(∂q(f,g))=0. Since ∂q and ord⁡A/q are bimultiplicative in f and g, writing f and g as quotients of elements of A extends the identity from elements to arbitrary f,g∈K×.

6.1F2F3step 5.1algebra

The rational-section key formula. On an integral scheme W of dimension n locally of finite type over the field, let s,t be nonzero rational sections of invertible sheaves L,M. Choose a locally finite family of prime divisors Zi outside whose union both sections are generators. At the generic point of Zi, put Bi=OW,Zi, choose local generators si,ti, and write s=fisi, t=giti. Representatives of the two iterated first Chern cycles differ by the cycle ∑i(ord⁡Bi(fi)div⁡M∣Zi(ti∣Zi)−ord⁡Bi(gi)div⁡L∣Zi(si∣Zi))=∑idiv⁡Zi(∂Bi(fi,gi)), with all terms pushed to W. To verify this equality, compare coefficients at a codimension-two point and trivialize L,M there. Rescaling si by a unit ui replaces fi by ui−1fi: both sides change by −ord⁡Bi(gi)div⁡(ui∣Zi), since the normalized DVR symbol satisfies ∂(ui−1,gi)=uˉi−ord⁡Bi(gi); norms give the same identity for nonnormal Bi by the finite norm-order computation in Proper pushforward of cycles and the norm formula. The analogous rescaling of ti also preserves the equality. We may therefore take the generators to be these trivializations, when the left side is zero and the right coefficient is zero by step 5.1. This proves the key formula without restricting a section that vanishes identically on Zi.

7.1step 6.1F2F3algebra

First Chern descent and commutation. The right side of the key formula is a locally finite sum of principal divisors, so the two iterated first Chern classes on [W] agree in An−2(W). Taking M=OW and t=r∈k(W)∗ gives c1(L)∩div⁡W(r)=c1(OW)∩div⁡L(s)=0: the section 1 of the trivial bundle has zero divisor on every integral cycle. Thus first Chern operators annihilate each rational-equivalence generator and commute on Chow groups. Pushforward along integral closed subschemes and linear extension give the same conclusions on arbitrary locally finite type schemes.

8.1F3step 6.1step 7.1algebra

Cartier Gysin descent with support. Let D=Z(s) for a global section of L, and test on an integral W. If W⊆D, its Gysin is the first Chern operator on W, which descends by step 7.1. Otherwise D∣W is Cartier. For a rational section t of M∣W, apply step 6.1, including the components of D∣W among the Zi, and choose si=s∣W when Zi⊈D. Then fi=1 for these indices, so their tame symbols are 1. The remaining principal divisors are on Zi⊆D, and therefore give a rational equivalence on D∩W, proving D!div⁡M∣W(t)=c1(M∣D∩W)∩[D∩W]. For M=OW and t=r the right side is zero. Hence Cartier Gysin annihilates principal-divisor relations in its target Chow group, including after base change when the pulled-back section is not Cartier. Proper compatibility used to push these computations to the ambient zero scheme is the norm-order formula in [F3] when a cycle is not contained in D, and the same formula applied to rational sections when it is contained.

9.1step 6.1step 8.1algebra∎

Two Cartier Gysins. For zero schemes D=Z(s) and D′=Z(t), choose rational sections on W equal to the given sections whenever W is not contained in their zero scheme; if it is contained, choose any nonzero rational section of the corresponding restricted line bundle. Choose local generators si=s outside D and ti=t outside D′. The two sides of the key formula represent the two iterated Gysins. Its right side has no term outside D∩D′, because there fi=1 or gi=1. Thus the principal-divisor relations occur on subvarieties of D∩D′∩W, proving commutation in the required target Chow group, including cycles contained in either divisor.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources