Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Degree-p differential trace extends across normal surface valuations

Statement

Assume AC and DC. Let S be a scheme and let Y→πX be a finite dominant S-morphism of normal integral Noetherian schemes of characteristic p whose function fields have purely inseparable degree p. If ΩX/S is coherent (Sheaf of relative Kähler differentials), then for q≥1 the generic differential trace extends canonically to π∗∧qΩY/S→(∧qΩX/S)∗∗. For a monogenic algebra B=A[z]/(zp−f) it kills forms pulled back from A and sends η∧zidz to zero for i<p−1 and to η∧df for i=p−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A base scheme S and a finite dominant S-morphism π ⁣:Y→X of normal integral Noetherian schemes of characteristic p with function fields of purely inseparable degree p, with ΩX/S coherent and q≥1.

[F1]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F2]

def-dependent-choice. Let X be a set and let R⊆X×X be a binary relation on X. Call R entire on X when for every x∈X there is y∈X with xRy. The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written DC, is the following statement. (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain)

[F3]

def-kahler-differentials-algebra. Let A→φB be a homomorphism of commutative rings and let Der⁡A(B,−) be the derivation functor of def-derivation-algebra. (Universal Kähler differential module)

[F4]

lem-regular-surface-reflexive-modules-and-codimension-one-lattices. Assume AC and DC. On a regular Noetherian surface a coherent reflexive module is locally free. For a finite module M over a normal Noetherian domain, a generic vector belonging to M∗∗ at every height-one localization belongs to M∗∗. For a coherent generic-rank-r module on a regular surface, (∧rM)∗∗ is the determinant line of M∗∗. (Reflexive surface modules and codimension-one lattice extension)

[F5]

lem-surface-modification-isomorphism-in-codimension-one. Assume AC. Let f:X→S be a modification of integral Noetherian schemes and let S be normal of dimension two. Then f is an isomorphism over an open subset containing every point of codimension at most one in S. The complement is a finite set of closed points. If every fibre is zero-dimensional, f is an isomorphism. (A normal-surface modification is an isomorphism in codimension one)

[F6]

thm-conormal-exact-sequence-algebra. Let A→P be a homomorphism of commutative rings, let I⊆P be an ideal and let B=P/I, with quotient map π ⁣:P→B. (Conormal exact sequence for an algebra quotient)

[F7]

thm-height-one-localisation-of-normal-noetherian-domain-is-dvr. Let R be a Noetherian integrally closed domain, and let p be a prime ideal of height 1. Then the localisation Rp is a discrete valuation ring. (Height-one localizations of normal Noetherian domains are DVRs)

[F8]

thm-nakayama-lemma. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let R be a commutative ring, let I⊴R satisfy I⊆J(R), and let M be a finitely generated left R-module. If IM=M, then M=0. (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma)

[F9]

Relative differentials ΩX/S are defined for a supplied structure morphism X→S; an S-morphism Y→X gives compatible structure maps and the corresponding maps of differential sheaves. (Sheaf of relative Kähler differentials)

Proof

1.1F3F6F9given

For a monogenic algebra B=A[z]/(zp−f) the differential presentation is (ΩA/S⊗AB⊕B dz)/(B df), so modulo forms pulled back from A the algebra is (∧q−1(ΩA/S/A df))⊗ΩB/A; define the trace by wedging a lift η with df and taking the coefficient of zp−1dz. Changing the lift by a multiple of df does not change the wedge, which proves well-definedness and the stated formula on η∧zidz.

2.1F3step 1.1

Independence of the choice of z follows from a universal coefficient calculation. Write z=∑i=0p−1λiwi, with wp=g; then f=zp=∑iλipgi. Terms in dz involving dλi are pulled-back base forms and are killed by the trace. The coefficient of wp−1dw in the remaining part of zjdz is the coefficient of wp−1 in zjz′(w) after reduction by wp=g. If j<p−1, then zjz′(w)=(j+1)−1(zj+1)′(w); a derivative term can reduce to wp−1 only from an original exponent divisible by p, whose derivative coefficient is zero in characteristic p. For j=p−1, first take universal coefficients in Fp[b,λ0,…,λp−1] and lift them to Z[b,λ0,…,λp−1]. There Zp−1Z′=(1/p)(Zp)′ for Z=∑iλiwi. In the expansion of Zp, the coefficient of wip is congruent modulo p to λip; every other contribution to a reduced wp−1 coefficient has coefficient divisible by p and vanishes after division and reduction modulo p. Thus the coefficient of wp−1 in zp−1z′ after wp=g is ∑i=1p−1iλipgi−1. Multiplying by dg gives df, so the trace formula is unchanged under the generator change. This polynomial identity holds after every coefficient specialization and uses no division by p in characteristic p.

3.1F7givenstep 2.1

To extend over X test at height-one localizations A=OX,x, which are discrete valuation rings by normality. The integral closure B in the degree-p field extension is a local discrete valuation ring because purely inseparable extensions have a unique prime, and it is a finite torsion-free A-module, hence free of rank p.

4.1F8step 3.1

Writing e for the ramification index and fres⁡ for the residue degree, the length of B/πAB is p=efres⁡; hence either e=p,fres⁡=1, in which case a uniformizer z with zp∈A generates B over A by Nakayama, or e=1,fres⁡=p, in which case a lift z of a residue-field primitive element has zp∈A by normality and Nakayama again gives B=A[z].

5.1F3F6step 1.1step 2.1step 4.1

In both cases of step 4.1 the monogenic formula of steps 1.1 and 2.1 applies at every height-one localization, taking regular relative forms to elements of ΩA/S; coherent relative differentials on Y follow from the exact conormal sequence and finiteness.

6.1F1F2F4F5step 5.1∎

The double-dual codimension-one lattice criterion for reflexive modules now extends the generic map π∗∧qΩY/S→(∧qΩX/S)∗∗, and the extension is canonical because its target injects into the generic module; the argument supplies the discrete-valuation-ring basis and coordinate-invariance details required for the trace extension. The Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice are inherited from the cited suppliers.

Remarks

  • The two cases at a height-one localization correspond to total ramification and to residue-field extension of degree p; Nakayama identifies the extension of discrete valuation rings with a monogenic algebra in both cases.
  • The stated formula for the trace is derived from the universal monogenic computation and then propagated to the normal surface by the codimension-one lattice criterion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources