How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Degree-p differential trace extends across normal surface valuations
Statement
Assume AC and DC. Let be a scheme and let be a finite dominant -morphism of normal integral Noetherian schemes of characteristic whose function fields have purely inseparable degree . If is coherent (Sheaf of relative Kähler differentials), then for the generic differential trace extends canonically to . For a monogenic algebra it kills forms pulled back from and sends to zero for and to for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A base scheme and a finite dominant -morphism of normal integral Noetherian schemes of characteristic with function fields of purely inseparable degree , with coherent and .
def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function with domain satisfying for all . (The Axiom of Choice)
def-dependent-choice. Let be a set and let be a binary relation on . Call entire on when The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written , is the following statement. (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain)
def-kahler-differentials-algebra. Let be a homomorphism of commutative rings and let be the derivation functor of def-derivation-algebra. (Universal Kähler differential module)
lem-regular-surface-reflexive-modules-and-codimension-one-lattices. Assume AC and DC. On a regular Noetherian surface a coherent reflexive module is locally free. For a finite module over a normal Noetherian domain, a generic vector belonging to at every height-one localization belongs to . For a coherent generic-rank- module on a regular surface, is the determinant line of . (Reflexive surface modules and codimension-one lattice extension)
lem-surface-modification-isomorphism-in-codimension-one. Assume AC. Let be a modification of integral Noetherian schemes and let be normal of dimension two. Then is an isomorphism over an open subset containing every point of codimension at most one in . The complement is a finite set of closed points. If every fibre is zero-dimensional, is an isomorphism. (A normal-surface modification is an isomorphism in codimension one)
thm-conormal-exact-sequence-algebra. Let be a homomorphism of commutative rings, let be an ideal and let , with quotient map . (Conormal exact sequence for an algebra quotient)
thm-height-one-localisation-of-normal-noetherian-domain-is-dvr. Let be a Noetherian integrally closed domain, and let be a prime ideal of height . Then the localisation is a discrete valuation ring. (Height-one localizations of normal Noetherian domains are DVRs)
thm-nakayama-lemma. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then . (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma)
Relative differentials are defined for a supplied structure morphism ; an -morphism gives compatible structure maps and the corresponding maps of differential sheaves. (Sheaf of relative Kähler differentials)
Proof
For a monogenic algebra the differential presentation is , so modulo forms pulled back from the algebra is ; define the trace by wedging a lift with and taking the coefficient of . Changing the lift by a multiple of does not change the wedge, which proves well-definedness and the stated formula on .
Independence of the choice of follows from a universal coefficient calculation. Write , with ; then . Terms in involving are pulled-back base forms and are killed by the trace. The coefficient of in the remaining part of is the coefficient of in after reduction by . If , then ; a derivative term can reduce to only from an original exponent divisible by , whose derivative coefficient is zero in characteristic . For , first take universal coefficients in and lift them to . There for . In the expansion of , the coefficient of is congruent modulo to ; every other contribution to a reduced coefficient has coefficient divisible by and vanishes after division and reduction modulo . Thus the coefficient of in after is . Multiplying by gives , so the trace formula is unchanged under the generator change. This polynomial identity holds after every coefficient specialization and uses no division by in characteristic .
To extend over test at height-one localizations , which are discrete valuation rings by normality. The integral closure in the degree- field extension is a local discrete valuation ring because purely inseparable extensions have a unique prime, and it is a finite torsion-free -module, hence free of rank .
Writing for the ramification index and for the residue degree, the length of is ; hence either , in which case a uniformizer with generates over by Nakayama, or , in which case a lift of a residue-field primitive element has by normality and Nakayama again gives .
In both cases of step 4.1 the monogenic formula of steps 1.1 and 2.1 applies at every height-one localization, taking regular relative forms to elements of ; coherent relative differentials on follow from the exact conormal sequence and finiteness.
The double-dual codimension-one lattice criterion for reflexive modules now extends the generic map , and the extension is canonical because its target injects into the generic module; the argument supplies the discrete-valuation-ring basis and coordinate-invariance details required for the trace extension. The Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice are inherited from the cited suppliers.
Remarks
- The two cases at a height-one localization correspond to total ramification and to residue-field extension of degree p; Nakayama identifies the extension of discrete valuation rings with a monogenic algebra in both cases.
- The stated formula for the trace is derived from the universal monogenic computation and then propagated to the normal surface by the codimension-one lattice criterion.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- Universal Kähler differential module
- Sheaf of relative Kähler differentials
- Reflexive surface modules and codimension-one lattice extension
- A normal-surface modification is an isomorphism in codimension one
- Conormal exact sequence for an algebra quotient
- Height-one localizations of normal Noetherian domains are DVRs
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Resolution of Surfaces, Lemmas 54.2.1–54.2.2 and Sections 54.8–54.9 (standard reference, not scraped)