Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A cusp: one blowup, the normalization and the delta drop

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) and let k be a field of characteristic different from 2 and 3. The cuspidal plane curve Z=V(y2−x3) in Ak2 is reduced with a unique singular point at the origin; it is of finite type over k, so its normalization is finite and is the bijective normalization map Ak1→Z, t↦(t2,t3). Blowing up the origin once makes the strict transform regular: in the chart y=xt the equation becomes x2(t2−x), so the strict transform is V(t2−x), a regular curve meeting the exceptional curve E=V(x) at the single point t=0 with intersection multiplicity 2; the regular strict transform has curve multiplicity 1 there. Two further point blowups make the total-transform support SNC: the second creates a transverse triple point and the third separates its three tangent directions. The strict transform is precisely the normalization of Z, the multiplicity at the unique point above the origin drops from 2 to 1, and for the projective completion of Z the normalization defect satisfies δk=1 before the blowup and δk=0 after it, in agreement with the general multiplicity formula r m(m−1)/2 with r=1 and m=2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a field k of characteristic different from 2 and 3, the cusp Z=V(y2−x3)⊆Ak2, its projective completion Zˉ=V(Y2Z−X3)⊆Pk2, and the blowup π:S1→Ak2 of the origin.

[F1]

Blowups of a regular surface at a closed point stay regular, and the exceptional curve of a two-dimensional center is a regular curve isomorphic to P1 over the residue field (Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional curves at two-dimensional local rings).

[F2]

Strict normal crossings: a reduced curve on a regular surface is SNC if at every closed point of its support exactly one regular component passes, or exactly two regular components pass and meet with multiplicity one (Strict normal crossings divisor on a regular surface).

[F3]

Normalization and defect: the normalization of a reduced finite-type curve over k is finite and unique up to unique isomorphism; the defect δk is the dimension of the global sections of the cokernel of OC→ν∗OCν and is supported on the non-normal locus (Normalization defect delta of a reduced curve, Normalization of a reduced curve is finite).

[F4]

Multiplicity formula: for a reduced curve C on a regular surface proper over k with an ample invertible sheaf, a closed point p of residue degree r and multiplicity m, the first blowup changes the defect by δk(C′)=δk(C)−r(m2), where C′ is the strict transform (Euler characteristic and normalization defect under a point blowup).

[F5]

The polynomial ring k[t] is a unique factorization domain, hence normal, so Ak1 is a normal curve (For every field F, F[x] is a unique factorisation domain).

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

The parametrization identifies R=k[x,y]/(y2−x3) with k[t2,t3]: modulo the monic relation every polynomial has the unique form f(x)+yg(x), and its image f(t2)+t3g(t2) is zero only when both polynomials vanish, since their monomials have disjoint even and odd exponents. This ring is a domain, finite integral over k[x] by its monic equation in y, and therefore has dimension one (Injective integral extensions preserve Krull dimension). At the origin its maximal ideal has the independent images of x,y as a cotangent basis, because the relation has no linear term, so its embedding dimension is two and the point is not regular. Away from the origin, x is invertible and t=y/x gives R[1/x]=k[t,t−1], whose local rings are regular (localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings). Thus the origin is the unique singular point.

1.2givenalgebra

In the chart y=xt, the strict transform is Z1=V(t2−x) and the exceptional curve is E=V(x). The equation is linear in x, so this strict transform is regular. In the other chart x=ys, the strict-transform equation is 1−ys3=0, which forces y and s to be invertible; consequently that entire chart portion lies in the overlap with the first chart and adds no point above the origin. Thus the first chart describes the whole strict transform of the affine cusp. Its intersection with E has coordinate ring k[t]/(t2), supported at q=(0,0) and of length two, so mq(Z1∩E)=2. The curve Z1 is regular and has curve multiplicity one at q, whereas the original cusp has multiplicity two because its lowest-degree equation is y2.

2.1F3F5step 1.2algebra

The strict transform is Ak1, parametrized by t with x=t2 and y=t3. The map k[t2,t3]↪k[t] is finite, because 1,t generate the latter as a module, and is birational, since t=y/x in the fraction field. Its source is normal: by [F5] it is a UFD, and if a reduced fraction a/b in its fraction field is integral, multiplying a monic integral equation by bn shows that b divides an; coprimality forces b to be a unit. Hence the finite birational parametrization is the normalization by [F3]. It is bijective on scheme points: it is an isomorphism where x≠0, and the fibre over the origin has support only t=0; there are no other points with x=0 on the cusp. This proves the claimed affine normalization and curve-multiplicity drop.

2.2F2step 1.2algebra

The contact of Z1 with E has multiplicity 2, so the support is not yet SNC by [F2]. Blow up the point q in the chart of step 1.2, writing x=tu: the strict transform of Z1=V(t2−x) becomes V(t2−tu)=V(t(t−u)), with strict transform V(t−u); the strict transform of E=V(x) becomes V(u); and the new exceptional curve is V(t). These are three distinct lines through the origin, meeting pairwise only there with multiplicity 1 (their three tangent directions are distinct): a transverse triple point.

3.1F1F2step 2.2

Blow up that triple point. Each of the three lines is regular there, and pairwise they meet with multiplicity 1, so the strict transform of each meets the new exceptional curve in its own point with multiplicity 1 and the three strict transforms become pairwise disjoint over the blown-up point. The resulting support has regular components, and at every closed point at most two components pass, meeting transversally; hence it is a strict normal crossings divisor by [F2], reached after three point blowups in total.

3.2F3F4step 1.2step 2.1algebra

The projective cubic Zˉ=V(Y2Z−X3) is regular away from its cusp. On the affine chart Z=1 outside the origin, x is invertible and t=y/x identifies the curve with Spec⁡k[t,t−1]. The only point at infinity is [0:1:0]; on the chart Y=1 its equation is v−u3=0, whose coordinate ring is k[u]. Thus the defect is supported only at the cusp and is the module k[t]/k[t2,t3], with basis the class of t. By [F3], its global section space has dimension one, so δk(Zˉ)=1. The projective strict transform after the first blowup is regular at the cusp by step 1.2 and is unchanged elsewhere. Its map to Zˉ is the intrinsic point blowup (Strict transforms of closed subschemes are blowups of the subscheme), hence finite by The blowup of a one-dimensional integral Noetherian scheme at a closed point is finite; it is birational and normal, so it is the normalization of Zˉ and has defect zero. Formula [F4] applies on Pk2, a regular proper surface with ample O(1), at the k-rational cusp with residue degree r=1 and multiplicity m=2. It gives δk(Zˉ′)=1−1(22)=0, agreeing with the direct calculation.

4.1F1step 1.2step 3.1step 3.2∎

Collecting: one point blowup makes the strict transform the regular normalization of the cusp and drops the multiplicity at the point over the origin from 2 to 1; three point blowups make the total-transform support SNC. The example therefore realizes the regularization theorem after one step and the embedded SNC conclusion after finitely many, with the defect drop δk=1→0 confirming the formula r m(m−1)/2=1.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

149 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources