Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Factorization of birational morphisms of regular surfaces into point blowups

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field and let X and Y be integral regular finite-type k-schemes of pure dimension two that are proper over k (for instance smooth projective surfaces over k). Then every birational morphism f ⁣:X→Y is a composition of blowups at closed points and an isomorphism: there are schemes X0=Y,X1,…,Xn with Xn≅X over Y, closed points yi−1∈Xi−1 with OXi−1,yi−1 regular of dimension two, and morphisms Xi=Bl⁡yi−1Xi−1→Xi−1 whose composition X→Y is f up to the isomorphism X≅Xn.

Equivalently, every proper birational morphism of such surfaces is, up to isomorphism, a composition of contractions of exceptional curves of the first kind (Exceptional curves of the first kind and their contractions).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, integral regular finite-type proper k-schemes X,Y of pure dimension two, and a birational morphism f ⁣:X→Y.

[F1]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F2]

def-birational-morphism-schemes. Let k be a field and let X and Y be integral k-schemes of finite type (def-integral-scheme, def-locally-finite-type-and-finite-type-morphism). (Birational morphisms of integral finite-type schemes)

[F3]

def-etale-locus-morphism. Let f:X→S be a morphism locally of finite presentation (def-locally-finite-presentation-morphism). The étale locus of f is Et⁡(f)={x∈X:the morphism f is eˊtale at x}⊆X, the set of points at which the conditions of def-etale-morphism-schemes hold. (def-etale-locus-morphism)

[F4]

def-proper-morphism. A morphism of schemes f:X→S is proper if and only if it is separated, of finite type, and universally closed. Here separatedness has the meaning of def-separated-morphism-schemes, finite type has the meaning of def-locally-finite-type-and-finite-type-morphism, and universally closed has the meaning of def-universally-closed-morphism. (Proper morphisms)

[F5]

def-quasi-finite-morphism-schemes. A morphism of schemes f:X→S is quasi-finite if it is of finite type (def-locally-finite-type-and-finite-type-morphism) and, for every point x∈X, there are affine neighbourhoods U=Spec⁡(B) of x and V=Spec⁡(A) of f(x) such that f(U)⊆V and the induced finite-type ring map A→B is quasi-finite at the prime (def-quasi-finite-morphism-schemes)

[F6]

def-smooth-morphism-schemes. Let f:X→S be a morphism of schemes, let x∈X and put s=f(x). The morphism f is smooth at x when the following three conditions hold at x: 1. f is locally of finite presentation at x (def-locally-finite-presentation-morphism); 2. f is flat at x (def-flat-morphism-schemes); 3. (def-smooth-morphism-schemes)

[F7]

lem-birational-surface-morphism-factors-through-blowup-at-a-non-isomorphism-point. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field, let X and Y be integral regular finite-type k-schemes of pure dimension two that are proper over k, and let f ⁣:X→Y be a birational morphism. (A birational morphism of regular surfaces factors through the blowup of a point where its inverse is undefined)

[F8]

lem-blowing-up-a-regular-point-is-a-contraction. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field, let S be an integral regular finite-type k-scheme of pure dimension two, let p∈S be a closed point, let π ⁣:S′=Bl⁡pS→S be the blowup of S at p and let E=π−1(p) be its exceptional curve. (Blowing up a regular point is a contraction)

[F9]

lem-contracted-curve-count-decreases-under-a-point-blowup-factorization. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k, X, Y and f ⁣:X→Y be as in A birational morphism of regular surfaces factors through the blowup of a point where its inverse is undefined, and let N(f) be the number of integral curves of X contracted by f, a nonnegative integer by Fibres of a proper birational morphism of regular surfaces. (The number of contracted curves drops by one after factoring through a point blowup)

[F10]

lem-fibre-components-of-a-proper-birational-morphism-of-regular-surfaces. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field, let X and Y be integral regular finite-type k-schemes of pure dimension two, let f ⁣:X→Y be a proper birational morphism and let y∈Y be a closed point. Put F=f−1(y). Then: 1. F is a proper κ(y)-scheme with dim⁡F≤1. 2. (Fibres of a proper birational morphism of regular surfaces)

[F12]

lem-surface-modification-isomorphism-in-codimension-one. Assume AC. Let f:X→S be a modification of integral Noetherian schemes and let S be normal of dimension two. Then f is an isomorphism over an open subset containing every point of codimension at most one in S. The complement is a finite set of closed points. If every fibre is zero-dimensional, f is an isomorphism. (A normal-surface modification is an isomorphism in codimension one)

[F13]

thm-blowup-regular-surface-closed-point-regular. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let S be a regular finite-type k-scheme of pure dimension two, let p be a closed point, put κ=κ(p) and r=[κ:k], and let π ⁣:S′=Bl⁡pS→S be the blowup of S at p with exceptional subscheme E. (Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional fibre over the residue field)

Proof

1.1F2F10F12given

Induct on the finite number N(f) of contracted curves, which is finite by the fibre-components lemma; the codimension-one modification lemma shows that f is an isomorphism outside finitely many closed points, if N(f)=0, the fibre-components lemma gives that f is an isomorphism, proving the induction base. Otherwise take the actual non-isomorphism locus, which is a nonempty finite set.

2.1F4step 1.1

Otherwise choose a point y of the finite exceptional set; the inverse rational map is undefined at y, because if it extended over an open neighbourhood it would give a section of the proper separated morphism f, which is closed and contains the generic point of the integral inverse image, hence equals it, making f an isomorphism there.

3.1F2F7F13step 2.1

The local factorization lemma then writes f=b∘g with b the blowup of Y at y; the source and target of g remain integral regular proper k-surfaces because a point blowup of a regular surface is regular and proper, and g is again birational.

4.1F9step 3.1

The curve-count lemma gives N(g)=N(f)−1: exactly one component of f−1(y) dominates the exceptional curve of b, and all other contracted curves of f remain contracted by g.

5.1F1F8step 4.1∎

Applying the induction hypothesis to g and composing with the point blowup b exhibits f as a composition of point blowups and an isomorphism, and each point blowup is a contraction of its exceptional curve by the definition; the Axiom of Choice is inherited from the cited suppliers.

Remarks

  • The induction measure is the number of contracted curves, which drops by exactly one at each factorization step.
  • No equality of rational maps f^{-1} composed with f is used; the undefinedness of the inverse at the chosen point is proved by the section argument.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

110 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources