How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rational maps of integral finite-type schemes
Definition
Let be a field and let be an integral -scheme of finite type and a -scheme of finite type (Integral schemes, Locally finite type and finite type morphisms) with separated over (Separated morphism of schemes).
A rational map is an equivalence class of pairs , where is a nonempty open subscheme (Open immersions of schemes) and is a -morphism (Morphisms of schemes). Two pairs and are equivalent when the two morphisms agree on a nonempty open subscheme of , that is, when there is a nonempty open with .
The relation is an equivalence relation. Reflexivity and symmetry are immediate. For transitivity let through and through . Since is integral, hence irreducible, any two nonempty open subschemes meet, so is a nonempty open subscheme of , and on the morphisms and agree with , hence with one another. Thus . No integrality or reducedness of the target is needed.
A rational map is dominant when some representative has dense image. This is independent of the representative: if and are equivalent through a nonempty open , then is dense in the irreducible scheme , so continuity gives ; hence dominant implies dominant, and the converse is symmetric. A point of at which no representative of is defined is a point of indeterminacy of .
When is integral and of finite type over , its function field is the stalk at the generic point, and the function field of every nonempty affine open is the fraction field of its coordinate ring (Function field of an integral finite-type scheme); this is the description used whenever a rational map of curves is converted into a map of function fields below.
Depends on
Used by
- Birational smooth proper curves are isomorphic Corollary
- Smoothness of the source cannot be dropped in the extension of rational maps Counterexample
- A smooth conic is a projective line once it has a rational point Example
- Rational maps from a smooth curve to a proper scheme are morphisms Lemma
- Smooth proper curves, dominant morphisms and function fields Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Algebraic Curves (tag 0BRV) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (version of October 21, 2025), Chs. 19 and 21 (standard reference, not scraped)