Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Blowing up a smooth point: charts, exceptional curve, and contraction

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the cited blowup and intersection suppliers. Let k be a field, let S be an integral regular finite-type k-scheme of pure dimension two, and let p∈S be a k-rational closed point. Let π ⁣:S′=Bl⁡pS→S be the blowup of p, with exceptional curve E=π−1(p).

  1. Charts. Over an affine neighbourhood Spec⁡A of p on which x,y generate the point ideal and are regular parameters at p, the blowup is Spec⁡A[y/x]∪Spec⁡A[x/y] inside A-charts, glued by inverting T and U=T−1 (Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps).
  2. Exceptional curve. E≅Pk1 is an effective Cartier divisor on the regular surface S′, OE(E)≅OPk1(−1) and, if S is projective over k, E⋅E=−1 (Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional fibre over the residue field, The normal bundle of the exceptional curve is O(-1), The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface). Hence E is an exceptional curve of the first kind and π is a contraction of E (Blowing up a regular point is a contraction).
  3. One-step factorization. If S is projective over k, then π is a birational morphism of regular projective surfaces which is an isomorphism over S∖{p}, so its factorization into point blowups consists of the single blowup π itself (Blowing up a regular point is a contraction), and no further blowup is needed.

For comparison, the companion counterexample page records that normalization of a non-normal surface with a one-dimensional singular locus is not a point blowup, so point-blowup factorization requires the stated target regularity. The intrinsic contraction definition requires regularity at the contracted target point, not global regularity of the source.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, an integral regular finite-type k-scheme S of pure dimension two, a k-rational closed point p∈S, and the blowup π ⁣:S′=Bl⁡pS→S with exceptional curve E=π−1(p).

[F1]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F2]

def-exceptional-curve-and-contraction. Assume the Axiom of Choice where it is inherited from the degree and intersection suppliers below (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a Noetherian scheme. (a) Exceptional curves of the first kind. A closed subscheme E⊆X (def-closed-immersion-schemes) is an exceptional curve of the first kind if: 1. (Exceptional curves of the first kind and their contractions)

[F3]

lem-blowing-up-a-regular-point-is-a-contraction. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the cited blowup and intersection suppliers. Let k be a field, let S be an integral regular finite-type k-scheme of pure dimension two, let p∈S be a closed point, let π ⁣:S′=Bl⁡pS→S be the blowup of S at p and let E=π−1(p) be its exceptional curve. (Blowing up a regular point is a contraction)

[F4]

lem-blowup-intersection-matrix-at-smooth-point. Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field, let X be an integral regular projective surface over k (def-divisor-intersection-number-on-smooth-projective-surface), let p∈X be a closed point with residue field κ(p) and r:=[κ(p):k], let π:X′=Bl⁡pX→X be the blowup of X at p. (The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface)

[F5]

lem-blowup-isomorphism-off-center. Let I be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type with zero scheme Z and let π ⁣:Bl⁡IX→X be the blowup. (The blowup is an isomorphism off the center)

[F6]

lem-exceptional-curve-normal-bundle-minus-one. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let p be a closed point of a regular surface S over a field k, assume dim⁡OS,p=2, and let π ⁣:S′→S be the blowup of p and E its exceptional curve. (The normal bundle of the exceptional curve is O(-1))

[F7]

thm-blowup-regular-surface-closed-point-regular. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let S be a regular finite-type k-scheme of pure dimension two, let p be a closed point, put κ=κ(p) and r=[κ:k], and let π ⁣:S′=Bl⁡pS→S be the blowup of S at p with exceptional subscheme E. (Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional fibre over the residue field)

[F8]

The affine blowup along I=(x,y) is covered by A[I/x] and A[I/y], whose overlap inverts T=y/x and U=x/y with TU=1. (Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps)

[F9]

thm-intersection-with-curve-as-degree-of-restriction. Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field, let X be an integral regular projective surface over k (def-divisor-intersection-number-on-smooth-projective-surface) and let C and D be effective Cartier divisors on X (def-effective-cartier-divisor, def-cartier-divisor) with associated line bundles OX(C) and (Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction)

Verification

1.1F8given

Over an affine neighbourhood Spec⁡A of p on which x,y generate the point ideal and are regular parameters at p, the blowup is covered by the two charts Spec⁡A[y/x] and Spec⁡A[x/y] inside the A-charts, glued by inverting the coordinate T and setting U=T−1, by the affine Rees-algebra chart formula.

2.1F2F3F6F7F9step 1.1

The exceptional curve E=π−1(p) is an effective Cartier divisor on the regular surface S′, isomorphic to Pk1 because the point is k-rational, and its normal bundle is OPk1(−1); the exceptional curve has the self-intersection datum E⋅E=−1 whenever S is projective, by the intersection-matrix computation and the restriction-degree identity.

3.1F2F3F5step 2.1

By step 2.1 the curve E is an exceptional curve of the first kind and π is a contraction of it; the blowup is an isomorphism off the centre p, so π restricts to an isomorphism S′∖E→S∖{p}.

4.1F3F5step 3.1

If S is projective over k, then π is a birational morphism of regular projective surfaces which is an isomorphism over the complement of the single point p; a factorization of π into point blowups is therefore the single blowup π itself, and no further blowup is needed.

5.1F1step 4.1F4∎

The computation is purely the published point-blowup dictionary; the Axiom of Choice is inherited from the blowup and intersection suppliers.

Remarks

  • The two charts and the glue are the reason the exceptional curve is a projective line over k when the point is k-rational.
  • The companion counterexample page shows that for a non-normal target with one-dimensional singular locus the normalization is not a point blowup, which records the failure of the stated regular-target factorization after dropping target regularity.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

86 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources