How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Normalization of a non-normal surface is not a point blowup
Statement refuted
False claim refuted: a normalization of a singular surface is a finite composition of point blowups, or more generally a proper modification that is an isomorphism outside a finite set of points.
Let be any field of characteristic and let Write and , and let Then:
- is an integral surface, its Jacobian singular locus is the whole -axis , and is not normal.
- The map is the finite birational normalization of and is an isomorphism exactly over . Over every geometric point of the -axis with , its fibre has two distinct points.
- Consequently is not a point blowup, not a finite composition of point blowups of , and not any proper modification of that is an isomorphism over the complement of a finite set of points: every point blowup is an isomorphism off its centre, whereas fails to be an isomorphism over infinitely many points of the -axis.
The target is nonnormal, so this example records the failure of point-blowup factorization when the target regularity hypothesis is dropped. Normalization is a different operation from point blowups.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field of characteristic not two, the ring , the ring , and the displayed map .
Normal scheme modifications and normalized point blowups: for an integral scheme, normalization is obtained on each affine open by taking the integral closure of its coordinate ring in the common function field and gluing these algebras.
Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains: the integral closure of a domain in an extension ring is the set of elements integral over it; a domain is integrally closed when this closure in its fraction field is the domain itself.
Finite morphisms of schemes: an affine morphism is finite when its target ring makes the source ring a finite module.
Birational morphisms of integral finite-type schemes: a dominant morphism of integral finite-type -schemes inducing an isomorphism of function fields is birational.
Finite-variable polynomial algebras over fields are integrally closed: the polynomial ring is an integrally closed domain for every field .
The blowup is an isomorphism off the center: a blowup is an isomorphism over the complement of the subscheme being blown up.
embedding dimension and regular local ring: a Noetherian local ring is regular when its embedding dimension, , equals its Krull dimension.
Affine-domain dimension equals transcendence degree: the dimension of a finite-type domain over a field equals the transcendence degree of its fraction field.
Counterexample
The polynomial is irreducible: over it is a quadratic in and can factor only if is a square, which it is not because its valuation at the prime is one; Gauss's lemma then gives irreducibility over . Thus is a domain, and embeds in it while is algebraic over , so its fraction field has transcendence degree two and is a surface by [F8]. The partial derivatives are , whose common zero locus on is exactly . At the generic point of this axis, is invertible and . Before localization this is a one-dimensional affine domain by [F8]; the chain shows the local ring has dimension one. Its maximal ideal has cotangent-space basis the classes of and , since the relation is in ; hence it is not regular by [F7].
Let be the displayed homomorphism. After inverting , it is an isomorphism , with inverse ; since is a domain and , is injective. Thus we identify and their fraction fields agree, so is birational by [F4]. The ring is generated as an -module by , because , so is finite by [F3]. The element is integral over by , but : modulo , the image of in is , which does not contain . Hence is not integrally closed and is not normal. Since is integrally closed by [F5], every element of the common fraction field integral over is also integral over and therefore lies in ; conversely every element of is integral over . Thus is the integral closure of , and [F1] identifies as the normalization.
The inverse proves that is an isomorphism over . For a geometric point on the -axis with , the fibre is given by and ; it has two distinct points because the geometric residue field has characteristic not two. At the origin , the local ring is not integrally closed either: if with and , then in . Reducing modulo gives in , where is the image of and has nonzero constant term, while is the image of . The left side is a nonzero polynomial containing only odd powers of , and the right side contains only even powers, a contradiction. Thus the normalization is not an isomorphism over any neighbourhood of the origin. Together with the two-point fibres this shows that its isomorphism locus is exactly .
By [F6], each point blowup is an isomorphism away from its centre. Therefore a finite composition of point blowups is an isomorphism over the complement of the finite set of images of its centres in . Any proper modification that is an isomorphism outside a finite set has the same property. But [step 3.1] shows that is not an isomorphism over the complement of any finite set, since infinitely many points of the -axis have fibres with two distinct geometric points. Hence it is not any of these point-blowup modifications.
Remarks
- Over a non-algebraically closed field, a point of the -axis with a nonsquare may have one degree-two residue-field point in its fibre; after geometric base change it splits into two distinct points, which is enough to rule out an isomorphism.
- The normalization is finite and birational, so it is a modification; what fails is exactly the description of its exceptional behaviour as finite point blowups.
Depends on
- Birational morphisms of integral finite-type schemes
- embedding dimension and regular local ring
- Finite morphisms of schemes
- Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains
- Normal scheme modifications and normalized point blowups
- The blowup is an isomorphism off the center
- Finite-variable polynomial algebras over fields are integrally closed
- Affine-domain dimension equals transcendence degree
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Resolution of Singular Algebraic Varieties (Clay Mathematics Proceedings 20, lecture series) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Resolution of Surfaces, Lemma 54.3.1 (Blowing up a regular surface at a point) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Olivier Debarre, Introduction to Mori Theory (M2 course notes, 2016 version) (standard reference, not scraped)