How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Birational Morphisms, Contractions, and Surface Singularities — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Affine Algebraic Sets and Coordinate Rings
- Affine Schemes and the Structure Sheaf
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Differentials Separability and Smooth Local Presentations
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Algebraic Zariski Main for Quasi-Finite Morphisms
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Associated Primes and Primary Decomposition
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Birational Morphisms, Contractions, and Surface Singularities
- Blowups, Exceptional Divisors, and Strict Transforms
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Cartier and Weil Divisors Line Bundles and Picard Groups
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Classical Affine Varieties: Coordinate Rings, Morphisms, and Rational Maps
- Cohomology of Quasi Coherent Sheaves on Affine and Projective Schemes
- Combinatorial Classes and the Symbolic Method
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Dedekind Domains and Ideal Classes
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules
- Derived Categories
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Diagonals Separated Morphisms and Valuative Uniqueness
- Dimension Constructible Images and Dimensions of Fibres
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Double Complexes Exact Couples and Convergence
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Fibre Products Base Change and Scheme Theoretic Fibres
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Finite Proper and Projective Morphisms
- Flat Smooth and Etale Morphisms
- Flatness and Faithful Flatness
- Formal Power Series
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Homogeneous Resultants and Projective Intersection Length
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Intersection Products on Smooth Projective Surfaces
- Kahler Differentials Conormal Sequences and Infinitesimal Lifting
- Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences
- Krull Dimension and Height Theorems
- Limits and Colimits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Mapping Cones Cylinders and Chain Triangles
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Modules over a Principal Ideal Domain and the Canonical Forms
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normalization Finiteness for Affine Domains
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Presheaves Sheaves Stalks and Sheafification
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Proj Projective Schemes Twisting Sheaves and Ampleness
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Quasi Coherent and Coherent Sheaves and Vector Bundles
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Regular Local Rings and Homological Dimension
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Riemann Roch for Curves via Euler Characteristics
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schemes Subschemes and Morphisms Locally of Finite Type
- Sheaf Cohomology Cech Cohomology and Comparison
- Sheaf Operations Exactness Ringed Spaces and Module Pullback
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Proper Curves Divisors Genus and Ramification
- Splitting Fields
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Holomorphic Inverse Function Theorem and Weierstrass Preparation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Tor Flatness and Global Dimension
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Triangulated Categories
- Universal Coefficients and Kunneth Theorems
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension
- Zariski Tangent Spaces, Regular Points, Smoothness, and Bertini
- Zariski Topology on Prime Spectra
2 · Summary
This companion page carries the two computations that calibrate the main page's statements. Blowing up a smooth point: charts, exceptional curve, and contraction works through the blowup of a smooth point of a regular surface: the two standard charts and their glue, the exceptional curve as a Cartier divisor isomorphic to with normal bundle , the self-intersection on a projective surface, and the resulting one-step factorization of the blowup as a contraction. Normalization of a non-normal surface is not a point blowup shows why the regular-target hypothesis matters for point-blowup factorization: the normalization of the Whitney umbrella is finite and birational but is not a point blowup, nor a finite composition of point blowups, because it is not an isomorphism over the complement of the one-dimensional singular axis. Both items cite the A-page dictionary rather than repeating its proofs. A contraction requires regularity at its contracted target point, as stated in Exceptional curves of the first kind and their contractions; it does not require global regularity of its source.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Normalization of a non-normal surface is not a point blowup
Statement refuted
False claim refuted: a normalization of a singular surface is a finite composition of point blowups, or more generally a proper modification that is an isomorphism outside a finite set of points.
Let be any field of characteristic and let Write and , and let Then:
- is an integral surface, its Jacobian singular locus is the whole -axis , and is not normal.
- The map is the finite birational normalization of and is an isomorphism exactly over . Over every geometric point of the -axis with , its fibre has two distinct points.
- Consequently is not a point blowup, not a finite composition of point blowups of , and not any proper modification of that is an isomorphism over the complement of a finite set of points: every point blowup is an isomorphism off its centre, whereas fails to be an isomorphism over infinitely many points of the -axis.
The target is nonnormal, so this example records the failure of point-blowup factorization when the target regularity hypothesis is dropped. Normalization is a different operation from point blowups.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field of characteristic not two, the ring , the ring , and the displayed map .
Normal scheme modifications and normalized point blowups: for an integral scheme, normalization is obtained on each affine open by taking the integral closure of its coordinate ring in the common function field and gluing these algebras.
Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains: the integral closure of a domain in an extension ring is the set of elements integral over it; a domain is integrally closed when this closure in its fraction field is the domain itself.
Finite morphisms of schemes: an affine morphism is finite when its target ring makes the source ring a finite module.
Birational morphisms of integral finite-type schemes: a dominant morphism of integral finite-type -schemes inducing an isomorphism of function fields is birational.
Finite-variable polynomial algebras over fields are integrally closed: the polynomial ring is an integrally closed domain for every field .
The blowup is an isomorphism off the center: a blowup is an isomorphism over the complement of the subscheme being blown up.
embedding dimension and regular local ring: a Noetherian local ring is regular when its embedding dimension, , equals its Krull dimension.
Affine-domain dimension equals transcendence degree: the dimension of a finite-type domain over a field equals the transcendence degree of its fraction field.
Counterexample
The polynomial is irreducible: over it is a quadratic in and can factor only if is a square, which it is not because its valuation at the prime is one; Gauss's lemma then gives irreducibility over . Thus is a domain, and embeds in it while is algebraic over , so its fraction field has transcendence degree two and is a surface by [F8]. The partial derivatives are , whose common zero locus on is exactly . At the generic point of this axis, is invertible and . Before localization this is a one-dimensional affine domain by [F8]; the chain shows the local ring has dimension one. Its maximal ideal has cotangent-space basis the classes of and , since the relation is in ; hence it is not regular by [F7].
Let be the displayed homomorphism. After inverting , it is an isomorphism , with inverse ; since is a domain and , is injective. Thus we identify and their fraction fields agree, so is birational by [F4]. The ring is generated as an -module by , because , so is finite by [F3]. The element is integral over by , but : modulo , the image of in is , which does not contain . Hence is not integrally closed and is not normal. Since is integrally closed by [F5], every element of the common fraction field integral over is also integral over and therefore lies in ; conversely every element of is integral over . Thus is the integral closure of , and [F1] identifies as the normalization.
The inverse proves that is an isomorphism over . For a geometric point on the -axis with , the fibre is given by and ; it has two distinct points because the geometric residue field has characteristic not two. At the origin , the local ring is not integrally closed either: if with and , then in . Reducing modulo gives in , where is the image of and has nonzero constant term, while is the image of . The left side is a nonzero polynomial containing only odd powers of , and the right side contains only even powers, a contradiction. Thus the normalization is not an isomorphism over any neighbourhood of the origin. Together with the two-point fibres this shows that its isomorphism locus is exactly .
By [F6], each point blowup is an isomorphism away from its centre. Therefore a finite composition of point blowups is an isomorphism over the complement of the finite set of images of its centres in . Any proper modification that is an isomorphism outside a finite set has the same property. But [step 3.1] shows that is not an isomorphism over the complement of any finite set, since infinitely many points of the -axis have fibres with two distinct geometric points. Hence it is not any of these point-blowup modifications.
Remarks
- Over a non-algebraically closed field, a point of the -axis with a nonsquare may have one degree-two residue-field point in its fibre; after geometric base change it splits into two distinct points, which is enough to rule out an isomorphism.
- The normalization is finite and birational, so it is a modification; what fails is exactly the description of its exceptional behaviour as finite point blowups.
Blowing up a smooth point: charts, exceptional curve, and contraction
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the cited blowup and intersection suppliers. Let be a field, let be an integral regular finite-type -scheme of pure dimension two, and let be a -rational closed point. Let be the blowup of , with exceptional curve .
- Charts. Over an affine neighbourhood of on which generate the point ideal and are regular parameters at , the blowup is inside -charts, glued by inverting and (Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps).
- Exceptional curve. is an effective Cartier divisor on the regular surface , and, if is projective over , (Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional fibre over the residue field, The normal bundle of the exceptional curve is O(-1), The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface). Hence is an exceptional curve of the first kind and is a contraction of (Blowing up a regular point is a contraction).
- One-step factorization. If is projective over , then is a birational morphism of regular projective surfaces which is an isomorphism over , so its factorization into point blowups consists of the single blowup itself (Blowing up a regular point is a contraction), and no further blowup is needed.
For comparison, the companion counterexample page records that normalization of a non-normal surface with a one-dimensional singular locus is not a point blowup, so point-blowup factorization requires the stated target regularity. The intrinsic contraction definition requires regularity at the contracted target point, not global regularity of the source.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , an integral regular finite-type -scheme of pure dimension two, a -rational closed point , and the blowup with exceptional curve .
def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function with domain satisfying for all . (The Axiom of Choice)
def-exceptional-curve-and-contraction. Assume the Axiom of Choice where it is inherited from the degree and intersection suppliers below (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a Noetherian scheme. (a) Exceptional curves of the first kind. A closed subscheme (def-closed-immersion-schemes) is an exceptional curve of the first kind if: 1. (Exceptional curves of the first kind and their contractions)
lem-blowing-up-a-regular-point-is-a-contraction. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the cited blowup and intersection suppliers. Let be a field, let be an integral regular finite-type -scheme of pure dimension two, let be a closed point, let be the blowup of at and let be its exceptional curve. (Blowing up a regular point is a contraction)
lem-blowup-intersection-matrix-at-smooth-point. Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let be an integral regular projective surface over (def-divisor-intersection-number-on-smooth-projective-surface), let be a closed point with residue field and , let be the blowup of at . (The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface)
lem-blowup-isomorphism-off-center. Let be a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type with zero scheme and let be the blowup. (The blowup is an isomorphism off the center)
lem-exceptional-curve-normal-bundle-minus-one. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a closed point of a regular surface over a field , assume , and let be the blowup of and its exceptional curve. (The normal bundle of the exceptional curve is O(-1))
thm-blowup-regular-surface-closed-point-regular. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a regular finite-type -scheme of pure dimension two, let be a closed point, put and , and let be the blowup of at with exceptional subscheme . (Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional fibre over the residue field)
The affine blowup along is covered by and , whose overlap inverts and with . (Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps)
thm-intersection-with-curve-as-degree-of-restriction. Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let be an integral regular projective surface over (def-divisor-intersection-number-on-smooth-projective-surface) and let and be effective Cartier divisors on (def-effective-cartier-divisor, def-cartier-divisor) with associated line bundles and (Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction)
Verification
Over an affine neighbourhood of on which generate the point ideal and are regular parameters at , the blowup is covered by the two charts and inside the -charts, glued by inverting the coordinate and setting , by the affine Rees-algebra chart formula.
The exceptional curve is an effective Cartier divisor on the regular surface , isomorphic to because the point is -rational, and its normal bundle is ; the exceptional curve has the self-intersection datum whenever is projective, by the intersection-matrix computation and the restriction-degree identity.
By step 2.1 the curve is an exceptional curve of the first kind and is a contraction of it; the blowup is an isomorphism off the centre , so restricts to an isomorphism .
If is projective over , then is a birational morphism of regular projective surfaces which is an isomorphism over the complement of the single point ; a factorization of into point blowups is therefore the single blowup itself, and no further blowup is needed.
The computation is purely the published point-blowup dictionary; the Axiom of Choice is inherited from the blowup and intersection suppliers.
Remarks
- The two charts and the glue are the reason the exceptional curve is a projective line over when the point is -rational.
- The companion counterexample page shows that for a non-normal target with one-dimensional singular locus the normalization is not a point blowup, which records the failure of the stated regular-target factorization after dropping target regularity.
Sources
- The Resolution of Singular Algebraic Varieties (Clay Mathematics Proceedings 20, lecture series)
- The Stacks Project, Resolution of Surfaces, Lemma 54.3.1 (Blowing up a regular surface at a point)
- Olivier Debarre, Introduction to Mori Theory (M2 course notes, 2016 version)
- The Stacks Project, Resolution of Surfaces, Section 54.16 (Contracting exceptional curves)