Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normalized point sequences and resolutions descend from completion

Statement

Assume AC and DC. For A as in the preceding normalization-completion lemma, every finite sequence of normalized point blowups over Spec⁡A^ has a uniquely corresponding finite sequence over Spec⁡A with isomorphic base-changed models. Each centre lies over the closed point. If the completed terminal scheme is regular, so is the descended terminal scheme. Singular centres correspond to singular centres.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A normal local surface domain A as in the normalization-completion lemma and a finite sequence of normalized point blowups over Spec⁡A^.

[F1]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F2]

def-dependent-choice. Let X be a set and let R⊆X×X be a binary relation on X. Call R entire on X when for every x∈X there is y∈X with xRy. The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written DC, is the following statement. (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain)

[F3]

lem-normal-surface-normalization-commutes-with-base-completion. Assume AC and DC. Let A be a normal local surface domain essentially of finite type over a field or a complete equicharacteristic local base, with normal completion A^. (Normalization of a surface modification commutes with local-base completion)

[F4]

lem-proper-surface-regularity-transfers-to-and-from-completion. Assume AC. Let (A,m) be a Noetherian local ring and X→Spec⁡A locally of finite type. Set Y=X×AA^. For y∈Y with image x∈X, regularity of OY,y implies regularity of OX,x. If y lies on the closed fibre, the two local rings are regular simultaneously. (Regularity of a proper scheme transfers to and from local-base completion)

[F5]

lem-surface-completion-base-change-preserves-closed-fibre-local-completions. Assume AC. Let (A,m) be a Noetherian local ring, A^ its maximal-adic completion, and X a scheme locally of finite type over A. Put Y=X×Spec⁡ASpec⁡A^. The closed fibres of X and Y are canonically isomorphic. (Completion base change preserves completed local rings on the closed fibre)

[F6]

lem-surface-finite-type-normalization-finite. Assume AC and DC. Every integral finite-type algebra over a field or a complete equicharacteristic Noetherian local base has finite normalization, and so do its localizations. Integral schemes of finite type over these bases consequently have finite scheme normalization. (Surface finite type normalization finite)

[F7]

thm-blowup-base-change-flat. Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the relative Proj construction. Let g ⁣:X′→X be a flat morphism of schemes and I a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type on X. (Flat base change for blowups, and failure without flatness)

Proof

1.1F5given

At each step properness sends the closed centre of the completed model to the closed point of the local base; the closed fibres of the corresponding models are canonically identified by the completion base-change lemma, so the centre corresponds to a unique closed point of the original model with the same residue field.

2.1F7step 1.1

The matching centre ideal commutes with completion base change: on an affine chart the prime of the closed point contains mA, and quotienting by m identifies the fibre prime, so flat base change gives the extended prime exactly, and blowups commute with this flat base change by the blowup base-change theorem.

3.1F3F6step 2.1

The finite normalizations of the two blowups commute with base change by the normalization-completion lemma, so the model identification is established inductively over the finite sequence; projectivity over the local affine base is preserved by blowups and by finite normalization.

4.1F4F5step 3.1

If the completed terminal model is regular, the proper regularity-transfer lemma descends regularity to the original terminal scheme; at the centres, the equality of completed local rings and the fact that a Noetherian local ring is regular exactly when its completion is regular give the equivalence of regularity, hence of singularity, of corresponding centres.

5.1F1F2step 4.1∎

No algebraic descent of arbitrary modification data is claimed: only the finite point sequences and their matching fibre ideals are descended, and the correspondence is unique because each completed centre has a unique corresponding closed point of the original model with the same residue field. The Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice are inherited from the cited suppliers.

Remarks

  • The descent is step by step along the finite sequence; the key inputs are flat base change for blowups and finite normalization, and completion comparison at the centres.
  • The statement is about point sequences and their regularity, not about arbitrary modifications.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources