How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Completion base change preserves completed local rings on the closed fibre
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a Noetherian local ring, its maximal-adic completion, and a scheme locally of finite type over . Put . The closed fibres of and are canonically isomorphic. If lies on this fibre and is its corresponding point, then the local homomorphism induces an isomorphism of maximal-adic completions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Noetherian local ring , its completion , a scheme locally of finite type over , the base change , and corresponding points , on the closed fibre.
def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function with domain satisfying for all . (The Axiom of Choice)
thm-completion-of-a-noetherian-local-ring. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a Noetherian local ring, and let be its -adic completion. 1. is a Noetherian local ring with maximal ideal . 2. The residue field is unchanged: 3. The completion map is faithfully flat. (Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field)
cor-completion-commutes-with-finite-quotients-and-submodules. Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a Noetherian commutative ring, let be an ideal, and let be finitely generated -modules. 1. The natural map is an isomorphism. 2. (Completion commutes with finite quotients and induced submodules)
thm-affine-fibre-product-tensor-ring. Let and be maps of commutative unital rings, allowing the zero ring. In the category of all schemes, The projections correspond to and . (Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products)
Proof
The assertion is local on , so write ; then with , because the fibre product of affine schemes is the spectrum of the tensor product.
The completion of quotients identifies with for every ; for this is the canonical identification of the closed fibres of and .
Let and correspond under the closed-fibre identification, so that , and the two primes have the same image in the common quotient . Since and , the isomorphism of step 2.1 passes to the quotients and gives compatible isomorphisms for every .
Localizing the compatible isomorphisms of step 3.1 at the corresponding primes gives compatible isomorphisms ; passing to inverse limits produces an isomorphism of the maximal-adic completions , which are the completed local rings of at and of at , and the map is induced by the local homomorphism .
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the completion suppliers; no further choice enters, and the identification is canonical once the points are matched.
Remarks
- The proof is the local computation behind the statement that completion of a Noetherian local ring commutes with base change for schemes locally of finite type.
- The corresponding-points hypothesis is exactly the identification of the closed fibres in step 1.2; no separability or finiteness over the residue field is used.
Depends on
Used by
- Nonsquare tangent-conic surface singularities terminate under point blowups Lemma
- Normalized point sequences and resolutions descend from completion Lemma
- Regularity of a proper scheme transfers to and from local-base completion Lemma
- Surface finite type formal fibres Lemma
- The double-plus-simple cubic surface branch terminates Lemma
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Resolution of Surfaces, Lemmas 54.11.1 and 54.11.2 (complete proof read) (standard reference, not scraped)