Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A nonzero section vanishing at a point forces positive degree

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field, let C be an integral proper k-scheme of dimension one and let L be an invertible OC-module with a nonzero global section s∈Γ(C,L). If s vanishes at some closed point of C, then deg⁡C(L)>0 for the degree of Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, an integral proper k-scheme C of dimension one, an invertible sheaf L on C with a nonzero global section s that vanishes at some closed point of C.

[F1]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F2]

def-degree-invertible-sheaf-proper-dimension-one. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Euler-characteristic supplier below (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field (def-field) and let C be a proper k-scheme (def-proper-morphism) whose underlying topological space is Noetherian of dimension at most one (def-dimension-noetherian-topological-space, def-locally-noetherian-and-noetherian-scheme). (Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme)

[F3]

def-integral-scheme. An integral scheme is a nonempty scheme that is reduced and whose underlying topological space is irreducible. Equivalently, it is nonempty and every nonempty affine open is the spectrum of a domain. The latter criterion is independent of the chosen affine open cover. (Integral schemes)

[F4]

def-invertible-sheaf. Let X be a scheme. An OX-module L is invertible if it is locally free of rank 1 (def-locally-free-sheaf-finite-rank): every point x∈X has an open neighbourhood U with L∣U  ≅  OU. Equivalently, X is covered by open sets U on which L∣U admits a generator, that is, a section s∈L(U) suc (Invertible sheaves)

[F5]

lem-euler-characteristic-additive-short-exact. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the finiteness and long-exactness suppliers cited below (The Axiom of Choice). (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences)

[F6]

lem-euler-characteristic-finite-support-twist-invariance. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Euler-characteristic supplier (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field (def-field), let X be a proper k-scheme, let p∈X be a closed point with residue field κ(p) (def-residue-field-scheme-point) and let i:Spec⁡κ(p)→X be the corresponding closed immersion. (Euler characteristic of a closed point, and invariance under an invertible twist)

Proof

1.1F3F4given

The section s defines an injection of sheaves OC→L: on a local trivialization of L the section is multiplication by a regular function, which is nonzero at the generic point because s≠0 and OC is a domain of dimension one, hence injective.

2.1F3F4step 1.1

Let Q be the cokernel of the injection of step 1.1. The map is an isomorphism at the generic point (both sheaves have rank one there), so Q has zero generic stalk; since Q is coherent its support is closed, and a proper closed subset of the one-dimensional Noetherian scheme C consists of finitely many closed points. Hence Q has finite support.

3.1F4step 2.1

At the closed point p where s vanishes, choose a local frame of L near p; the section corresponds to a germ f∈mpOC,p with f≠0, so Qp=OC,p/fOC,p≠0 and Qp has length at least one over the local ring OC,p.

4.1F2F5F6step 2.1step 3.1

The short exact sequence 0→OC→L→Q→0 gives deg⁡C(L)=χ(C,L)−χ(C,OC)=χ(C,Q) by additivity of the Euler characteristic, and a coherent finite-support sheaf is pushed forward from its zero-dimensional Artinian annihilator subscheme. Its finite module has a composition series with skyscraper factors κ(p); applying [F5] along this series and [F6] to each factor gives χ(C,Q)=∑plength⁡OC,p(Qp) [κ(p):k], the sum over the finitely many closed points in the support of Q.

5.1F2step 4.1step 3.1F1∎

By step 3.1 some closed point has a nonzero contribution, while all terms in the sum are nonnegative; hence χ(C,Q)>0 and therefore deg⁡C(L)>0, as claimed.

Remarks

  • No smoothness or geometric integrality is assumed: the identity deg⁡C(L)=χ(C,Q) uses only properness, integrality and dimension one, and the closed-point contributions are weighted by the residue-field degrees.
  • The vanishing hypothesis is used only to produce one nonzero local quotient; a section vanishing nowhere would give Q=0 and degree zero.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources