How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A nonzero section vanishing at a point forces positive degree
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a field, let be an integral proper -scheme of dimension one and let be an invertible -module with a nonzero global section . If vanishes at some closed point of , then for the degree of Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , an integral proper -scheme of dimension one, an invertible sheaf on with a nonzero global section that vanishes at some closed point of .
def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function with domain satisfying for all . (The Axiom of Choice)
def-degree-invertible-sheaf-proper-dimension-one. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Euler-characteristic supplier below (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field (def-field) and let be a proper -scheme (def-proper-morphism) whose underlying topological space is Noetherian of dimension at most one (def-dimension-noetherian-topological-space, def-locally-noetherian-and-noetherian-scheme). (Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme)
def-integral-scheme. An integral scheme is a nonempty scheme that is reduced and whose underlying topological space is irreducible. Equivalently, it is nonempty and every nonempty affine open is the spectrum of a domain. The latter criterion is independent of the chosen affine open cover. (Integral schemes)
def-invertible-sheaf. Let be a scheme. An -module is invertible if it is locally free of rank (def-locally-free-sheaf-finite-rank): every point has an open neighbourhood with Equivalently, is covered by open sets on which admits a generator, that is, a section suc (Invertible sheaves)
lem-euler-characteristic-additive-short-exact. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the finiteness and long-exactness suppliers cited below (The Axiom of Choice). (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences)
lem-euler-characteristic-finite-support-twist-invariance. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Euler-characteristic supplier (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field (def-field), let be a proper -scheme, let be a closed point with residue field (def-residue-field-scheme-point) and let be the corresponding closed immersion. (Euler characteristic of a closed point, and invariance under an invertible twist)
Proof
The section defines an injection of sheaves : on a local trivialization of the section is multiplication by a regular function, which is nonzero at the generic point because and is a domain of dimension one, hence injective.
Let be the cokernel of the injection of step 1.1. The map is an isomorphism at the generic point (both sheaves have rank one there), so has zero generic stalk; since is coherent its support is closed, and a proper closed subset of the one-dimensional Noetherian scheme consists of finitely many closed points. Hence has finite support.
At the closed point where vanishes, choose a local frame of near ; the section corresponds to a germ with , so and has length at least one over the local ring .
The short exact sequence gives by additivity of the Euler characteristic, and a coherent finite-support sheaf is pushed forward from its zero-dimensional Artinian annihilator subscheme. Its finite module has a composition series with skyscraper factors ; applying [F5] along this series and [F6] to each factor gives , the sum over the finitely many closed points in the support of .
By step 3.1 some closed point has a nonzero contribution, while all terms in the sum are nonnegative; hence and therefore , as claimed.
Remarks
- No smoothness or geometric integrality is assumed: the identity uses only properness, integrality and dimension one, and the closed-point contributions are weighted by the residue-field degrees.
- The vanishing hypothesis is used only to produce one nonzero local quotient; a section vanishing nowhere would give and degree zero.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Resolution of Surfaces, Section 54.7 (Vanishing) (standard reference, not scraped)