How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relative normalization and its finite-stage reduction
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be quasi-finite and separated, with quasi-compact and quasi-separated. Let be the integral closure of in , taken on affine opens, and put . Then is a quasi-coherent -algebra, is integral, and the natural map is an open immersion. The construction commutes with étale base change near the finite components selected by an elementary étale neighbourhood. Moreover there is a finite quasi-coherent subalgebra whose relative spectrum provides the finite stage needed for the scheme-level Zariski Main factorization.
The affine-local construction, étale descent of the local finite components, and finite-stage construction are proved below. The qcqs filtration and standard-étale inputs are supplied by Integral quasi-coherent algebras over qcqs bases are unions of finite subalgebras and Integral closure commutes with étale base change. The elementary étale splitting is proved in Finite decomposition around isolated fibre points after an elementary étale change.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The morphism and base conditions in the Statement.
A quasi-finite morphism is of finite type; together with separatedness over a qcqs base this makes quasi-compact and quasi-separated (Quasi-finite morphisms of schemes). For a qcqs morphism , the pushforward has affine-local quasi-coherent algebra charts with principal restrictions computed by localization (Structure sheaf of a quasi-compact quasi-separated morphism is affine-local).
Integral closure of a ring map commutes with localization (Integrality and integral closure commute with localisation), and affine-local quasi-coherent algebras glue to relative spectra (Glue relative spectra of affine-local algebras).
Integral closure commutes with étale base change; the recorded proof uses the proved standard-étale local structure (Integral closure commutes with étale base change).
After an elementary étale change, finitely many isolated fibre points can be split into open-and-closed finite components; this inherits the proved single-point étale local structure input (Finite decomposition around isolated fibre points after an elementary étale change).
An integral quasi-coherent algebra over a qcqs scheme is the filtered union of finite quasi-coherent subalgebras. Its recorded proof uses the qcqs extension lemma (Integral quasi-coherent algebras over qcqs bases are unions of finite subalgebras). The affine quasi-finite algebra factorization gives local open finite models (A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra).
AC is the choice-function axiom (The Axiom of Choice).
For an elementary étale neighbourhood with , the unique fibre-product point over has residue field ; likewise a point over has a unique lift over with residue field (Points of a fibre product via residue-field tensors).
Étale morphisms remain étale under base change and are open maps (Étale stability, Etale morphisms are universally open and quasi-finite at every point).
Proof
Proof technique: relative affine construction, étale descent of finite local pieces, and descent to a finite subalgebra stage.
On an affine open , put and let be the elements integral over the image of . By [F1], on a principal open one has . By [F2], the integral closure of in is . Thus the agree on a basis of overlaps and glue to a quasi-coherent -algebra . This proves the first assertion about without the later étale or finite-stage inputs.
The inclusion gives, by the relative spectrum adjunction in [F2], a canonical -morphism . Every is integral over by definition, so is affine and integral on each affine base chart. The construction is compatible with restriction to affine opens by step 1.1.
Let over . By [F4], choose an elementary étale neighbourhood on which the selected part of is an open-and-closed finite -scheme . By [F3], the integral closure algebra of in is the pullback of on a neighbourhood of . Shrink to that neighbourhood; the elementary étale property and the clopen finite decomposition persist, and the base-change identity now holds throughout . The decomposition yields a product decomposition of this pushforward algebra. Since the algebra of the finite -scheme is integral over , its integral closure in itself is itself; therefore the base-changed has a corresponding factor , and is the identity on that factor. This is the local finite-component calculation; it uses no claim that the complementary is finite.
Use the actual étale neighbourhoods to prove openness. For each , step 3.1 gives a finite clopen factor identified by with a clopen factor of . The projection is étale and therefore open by [F8]. Its image is an open neighbourhood of contained in , because every point of comes from . These images cover , making open in . For any open , the sets are open subsets of and cover it as varies through . Hence is an open map onto its open image. This argument uses the open sets in the actual étale cover , rather than a local-ring isomorphism alone.
Fix and . Set , and for the chosen elementary étale chart set . The étale local map is flat and local, hence faithfully flat. By [F7], the chosen lift of is the unique point above and the chosen lift of is the unique point above . The selected clopen factor contains ; hence its inverse image in is all of that local scheme, since an open containing the closed point of a local scheme is the whole scheme. The complementary part of maps to a disjoint factor of , and is the identity. Consequently the entire base change is an isomorphism, where .
Choose an affine open containing the point corresponding to over the closed point of . By step 4.2, its base change is an open of containing its closed point, so . Since , the natural map is an isomorphism. Faithful flatness of kills the kernel and cokernel of , so is an isomorphism. The complement has empty base change to by step 4.2; faithful flatness is surjective on spectra, so this complement is empty. Thus is an isomorphism. In particular, the fibre of over has exactly one point and its stalk map is an isomorphism. Since every point of has such a unique preimage, step 4.1 makes a homeomorphism onto an open subset and these stalk isomorphisms identify its structure sheaf. Therefore is an open immersion.
By the open immersion of step 5.1, its image is a quasi-compact open of : is quasi-compact over the quasi-compact base by [F1]. Write using the filtered finite quasi-coherent subalgebras of [F5] and put , so on affine base charts. On a finite affine cover of , the quasi-compact open is a finite union of principal opens in an affine chart of . The finitely many occur in one ; hence is the inverse image of an open there. Because is quasi-separated, the pairwise intersections of the finite affine base cover are quasi-compact and admit finite affine refinements. On these finitely many overlap charts, equality of two such finite unions after passage to the filtered colimit is witnessed by finitely many radical-containment identities among their generators. Each identity holds at a later finite stage, since its finitely many coefficients and equalities occur there. After taking one common stage for the finite cover and its overlaps, the glue to a quasi-compact open with inverse image exactly .
By step 5.1, where . The morphism is of finite type by [F1]. Cover by finitely many affine opens lying over affine . Because is affine and is the inverse image of , their inverse images in are affine, say , with on the corresponding stages. Since is a finitely generated -algebra, choose finitely many -algebra generators of and lift each from some . At a common later stage is surjective. The finitely many affine charts therefore show, at one common stage, that is a closed immersion. Let be its scheme-theoretic image, defined by the kernel of . On the kernel cuts out exactly , so as schemes and is open. The closed subscheme is finite because is finite. This proves the finite-stage factorization.
If , the pushforward algebra is the zero algebra and ; the empty open immersion and finite zero-algebra stage satisfy the statement. Nonreduced and zero-ring affine charts are retained in step 1.1. AC is inherited through [F3]–[F5]; the local affine construction itself uses no additional choice. The open-immersion and finite-stage conclusions follow from steps 4.1–6.1.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Quasi-finite morphisms of schemes
- Glue relative spectra of affine-local algebras
- Structure sheaf of a quasi-compact quasi-separated morphism is affine-local
- Integrality and integral closure commute with localisation
- Integral closure commutes with étale base change
- Integral quasi-coherent algebras over qcqs bases are unions of finite subalgebras
- Finite decomposition around isolated fibre points after an elementary étale change
- A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra
- Points of a fibre product via residue-field tensors
- Étale stability
- Etale morphisms are universally open and quasi-finite at every point
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
82 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, More on Morphisms, Sections 37.41–37.43 (étale neighbourhoods and Zariski Main) (standard reference, not scraped)