Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Relative normalization and its finite-stage reduction

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let f:X→S be quasi-finite and separated, with S quasi-compact and quasi-separated. Let C be the integral closure of OS in f∗OX, taken on affine opens, and put N=Spec⁡SC. Then C is a quasi-coherent OS-algebra, N→S is integral, and the natural map j:X→N is an open immersion. The construction commutes with étale base change near the finite components selected by an elementary étale neighbourhood. Moreover there is a finite quasi-coherent subalgebra C0⊆C whose relative spectrum provides the finite stage needed for the scheme-level Zariski Main factorization.

The affine-local construction, étale descent of the local finite components, and finite-stage construction are proved below. The qcqs filtration and standard-étale inputs are supplied by Integral quasi-coherent algebras over qcqs bases are unions of finite subalgebras and Integral closure commutes with étale base change. The elementary étale splitting is proved in Finite decomposition around isolated fibre points after an elementary étale change.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The morphism and base conditions in the Statement.

[F1]

A quasi-finite morphism is of finite type; together with separatedness over a qcqs base this makes f quasi-compact and quasi-separated (Quasi-finite morphisms of schemes). For a qcqs morphism f, the pushforward f∗OX has affine-local quasi-coherent algebra charts with principal restrictions computed by localization (Structure sheaf of a quasi-compact quasi-separated morphism is affine-local).

[F2]

Integral closure of a ring map commutes with localization (Integrality and integral closure commute with localisation), and affine-local quasi-coherent algebras glue to relative spectra (Glue relative spectra of affine-local algebras).

[F3]

Integral closure commutes with étale base change; the recorded proof uses the proved standard-étale local structure (Integral closure commutes with étale base change).

[F4]

After an elementary étale change, finitely many isolated fibre points can be split into open-and-closed finite components; this inherits the proved single-point étale local structure input (Finite decomposition around isolated fibre points after an elementary étale change).

[F5]

An integral quasi-coherent algebra over a qcqs scheme is the filtered union of finite quasi-coherent subalgebras. Its recorded proof uses the qcqs extension lemma (Integral quasi-coherent algebras over qcqs bases are unions of finite subalgebras). The affine quasi-finite algebra factorization gives local open finite models (A quasi-finite algebra factors openly through a finite algebra).

[F6]

AC is the choice-function axiom (The Axiom of Choice).

[F7]

For an elementary étale neighbourhood with κ(t)=κ(s), the unique fibre-product point over (x,t) has residue field κ(x); likewise a point y over s has a unique lift over (y,t) with residue field κ(y) (Points of a fibre product via residue-field tensors).

[F8]

Étale morphisms remain étale under base change and are open maps (Étale stability, Etale morphisms are universally open and quasi-finite at every point).

Proof

Proof technique: relative affine construction, étale descent of finite local pieces, and descent to a finite subalgebra stage.

1.1F1F2

On an affine open U=Spec⁡R⊆S, put MU=Γ(f−1U,OX) and let CU⊆MU be the elements integral over the image of R. By [F1], on a principal open D(r)⊆U one has MD(r)≅(MU)r. By [F2], the integral closure of Rr in (MU)r is (CU)r. Thus the CU agree on a basis of overlaps and glue to a quasi-coherent OS-algebra C⊆f∗OX. This proves the first assertion about C without the later étale or finite-stage inputs.

2.1F2step 1.1

The inclusion C→f∗OX gives, by the relative spectrum adjunction in [F2], a canonical S-morphism j:X→N=Spec⁡SC. Every CU is integral over R by definition, so N→S is affine and integral on each affine base chart. The construction is compatible with restriction to affine opens by step 1.1.

3.1F3F4step 2.1

Let x∈X over s∈S. By [F4], choose an elementary étale neighbourhood (T,t)→(S,s) on which the selected part of XT is an open-and-closed finite T-scheme V. By [F3], the integral closure algebra of T in (fT)∗OXT is the pullback of C on a neighbourhood of t. Shrink T to that neighbourhood; the elementary étale property and the clopen finite decomposition persist, and the base-change identity now holds throughout T. The decomposition XT=V⊔W yields a product decomposition of this pushforward algebra. Since the algebra of the finite T-scheme V is integral over OT, its integral closure in itself is itself; therefore the base-changed NT has a corresponding factor V, and jT is the identity on that factor. This is the local finite-component calculation; it uses no claim that the complementary W is finite.

4.1F3F4F8step 3.1

Use the actual étale neighbourhoods to prove openness. For each x∈X, step 3.1 gives a finite clopen factor V⊆XT identified by jT with a clopen factor of NT. The projection p:NT→N is étale and therefore open by [F8]. Its image p(V) is an open neighbourhood of j(x) contained in j(X), because every point of V comes from XT. These images cover j(X), making j(X) open in N. For any open O⊆X, the sets p(jT(OT∩V)) are open subsets of j(O) and cover it as x varies through O. Hence j is an open map onto its open image. This argument uses the open sets V in the actual étale cover NT, rather than a local-ring isomorphism alone.

4.2F3F4F7F8step 3.1

Fix x∈X and y=j(x). Set A=ON,y, and for the chosen elementary étale chart (T,t) set A′=ONT,(y,t). The étale local map A→A′ is flat and local, hence faithfully flat. By [F7], the chosen lift of x is the unique point above (x,t) and the chosen lift of y is the unique point above (y,t). The selected clopen factor V⊆NT contains (y,t); hence its inverse image in Spec⁡A′ is all of that local scheme, since an open containing the closed point of a local scheme is the whole scheme. The complementary part of XT maps to a disjoint factor of NT, and jT∣V is the identity. Consequently the entire base change XA×Spec⁡ASpec⁡A′→Spec⁡A′ is an isomorphism, where XA=X×NSpec⁡A.

5.1F7step 4.1step 4.2

Choose an affine open W=Spec⁡D⊆XA containing the point corresponding to x over the closed point of Spec⁡A. By step 4.2, its base change WA′ is an open of Spec⁡A′ containing its closed point, so WA′=Spec⁡A′. Since WA′=Spec⁡(D⊗AA′), the natural map A′→D⊗AA′ is an isomorphism. Faithful flatness of A→A′ kills the kernel and cokernel of A→D, so A→D is an isomorphism. The complement XA∖W has empty base change to A′ by step 4.2; faithful flatness is surjective on spectra, so this complement is empty. Thus jA:XA→Spec⁡A is an isomorphism. In particular, the fibre of j over y has exactly one point and its stalk map ON,y→OX,x is an isomorphism. Since every point of j(X) has such a unique preimage, step 4.1 makes j a homeomorphism onto an open subset and these stalk isomorphisms identify its structure sheaf. Therefore j is an open immersion.

6.1F1F5step 5.1

By the open immersion of step 5.1, its image J=j(X) is a quasi-compact open of N: f is quasi-compact over the quasi-compact base by [F1]. Write C=lim→⁡iCi using the filtered finite quasi-coherent subalgebras of [F5] and put Ti=Spec⁡SCi, so N=lim←⁡iTi on affine base charts. On a finite affine cover of S, the quasi-compact open J is a finite union of principal opens D(c1),…,D(cm) in an affine chart of N. The finitely many ca occur in one Ci; hence J is the inverse image of an open Ji⊆Ti there. Because S is quasi-separated, the pairwise intersections of the finite affine base cover are quasi-compact and admit finite affine refinements. On these finitely many overlap charts, equality of two such finite unions after passage to the filtered colimit is witnessed by finitely many radical-containment identities among their generators. Each identity holds at a later finite stage, since its finitely many coefficients and equalities occur there. After taking one common stage for the finite cover and its overlaps, the Ji glue to a quasi-compact open Ji⊆Ti with inverse image exactly J.

7.1F1F2F5step 5.1step 6.1

By step 5.1, X≅J=lim←⁡k≥iJk where Jk=Ji×TiTk. The morphism X→S is of finite type by [F1]. Cover Ji by finitely many affine opens V=Spec⁡Ai lying over affine Spec⁡R⊆S. Because N→Ti is affine and X≅J is the inverse image of Ji, their inverse images in X are affine, say Spec⁡B, with B=lim→⁡k≥iAk on the corresponding stages. Since B is a finitely generated R-algebra, choose finitely many R-algebra generators of B and lift each from some Ak. At a common later stage Ak→B is surjective. The finitely many affine charts therefore show, at one common stage, that X→Jk is a closed immersion. Let Z⊆Tk be its scheme-theoretic image, defined by the kernel of OTk→jk∗OX. On Jk the kernel cuts out exactly X, so X=Z∩Jk as schemes and X↪Z is open. The closed subscheme Z→S is finite because Tk→S is finite. This proves the finite-stage factorization.

8.1F1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8step 1.1step 2.1step 4.1step 6.1step 7.1∎

If X=∅, the pushforward algebra is the zero algebra and N=∅; the empty open immersion and finite zero-algebra stage satisfy the statement. Nonreduced and zero-ring affine charts are retained in step 1.1. AC is inherited through [F3]–[F5]; the local affine construction itself uses no additional choice. The open-immersion and finite-stage conclusions follow from steps 4.1–6.1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

82 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources