How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The element 1/p is integral over Z[1/p] but not over Z
Example
Let be a prime number. Inside , the element is integral over but not integral over .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A prime number , the inclusion , and the localisation .
Integrality localises, and conversely denominators can be cleared after localisation (Integrality and integral closure commute with localisation).
Verification
The element already belongs to the base ring , so it satisfies the monic equation there. Hence it is integral over .
Suppose were integral over . Then there would be a monic equation with . Multiplying by gives , impossible because the left side is congruent to modulo .
Thus localisation makes integral only after has become invertible in the base ring.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Proposition 6.7 (standard reference, not scraped)