How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hochschild cohomology of algebraic groups and the classification of Hochschild extensions
Definition
Let be a field, let be an algebraic group over (Group schemes of finite type over a field) and let be a -module: a commutative group functor on -algebras equipped with a left action of by group homomorphisms. A typical example is a rational representation of an affine viewed as a group functor (Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme).
For put the group of -cochains, with pointwise addition. Here each cochain is a family of maps on algebra-valued points compatible with every base change, rather than an arbitrary function on one point set; for represented functors these are morphisms of schemes by Yoneda. With the convention so that . The coboundary is evaluated functorially on -algebras; one checks by the usual alternating-sum cancellation, using functoriality of the -action on . The Hochschild cohomology of with coefficients in is so in particular is the group of -invariant -points, and is a complex of abelian groups.
An exact sequence of -modules gives a long exact sequence when its induced cochain maps are surjective in every degree (for example when has a section as a map of set-valued functors). Then the induced complexes form a short exact sequence, and the usual connecting-map construction gives
For rational modules , this surjectivity always holds for an exact sequence of representations: any -linear splitting of the coefficient vector spaces is a natural map of their additive functors, and applying it to a cochain gives a lift (equivariance of that splitting is not required). If is affine with coordinate ring , Yoneda gives , so degreewise exactness also follows directly from tensoring vector spaces over a field. These rational cochains commute with filtered unions of coefficient submodules, because each tensor is a finite sum. The rational-module statements on this page use this case.
For the second cohomology group the following classification holds (Crossed homomorphisms, principal crossed homomorphisms and Hochschild extensions for the terminology). Let be the set of equivalence classes of Hochschild extensions inducing the given action of on , two extensions being equivalent when they are isomorphic over by a map restricting to the identity on . Then there is a canonical bijection sending the class of an extension with a section to the class of the -cocycle i.e. the unique element with ; the class of is independent of the choice of section, and a -cocycle conversely determines an extension with the given action. This is Milne's Proposition 15.10; the definitions and the functoriality statements used here are the formal parts of Sections 15(b)-(c) of the cited source.
Depends on
- Crossed homomorphisms, principal crossed homomorphisms and Hochschild extensions
- Group schemes of finite type over a field
- Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme
- The tensor product $M\otimes_R N$ from the additive group underlying the free $\mathbb Z$-module on $M\times N$, elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums
Used by
- Shapiro's lemma for the trivial subgroup and acyclicity of free comodules Lemma
- Extensions of multiplicative-type groups by a one-dimensional vector group with a linear action split Proposition
- Higher Hochschild cohomology vanishes for linearly reductive groups Proposition
- Linear reductivity is equivalent to vanishing of first Hochschild cohomology Proposition
- Conjugacy of diagonalizable complements and maximal subgroups under smoothness hypotheses Theorem
- Splitting trigonalizable extensions: algebraically closed fields and two perfect-field cases Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (v2.00, 20 December 2015 author-hosted preliminary edition) (standard reference, not scraped)