Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Linear reductivity is equivalent to vanishing of first Hochschild cohomology

Statement

Let k be a field and let G be an algebraic group over k. Then G is linearly reductive (every finite-dimensional rational representation of G is a direct sum of simple representations) if and only if H1(G,V)=0 for every finite-dimensional rational representation V of G.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, a finite-type group scheme G over k (Group schemes of finite type over a field), and a finite-dimensional rational representation V of G. Here a representation means a natural family of group homomorphisms G(R)→Aut⁡R(V⊗kR) for all commutative k-algebras R; in finite dimension this is a morphism of group schemes G→GL⁡(V). No affineness of G is required for this convention.

[F1]

For a G-module M the Hochschild complex C∙(G,M) has cohomology H∙(G,M), H0(G,M)=MG is the fixed subgroup, and a short exact sequence 0→M′→M→M′′→0 of rational G-modules induces a long exact sequence in cohomology, because its coefficient vector spaces split linearly and hence its natural cochain maps are surjective. (Hochschild cohomology of algebraic groups and the classification of Hochschild extensions)

[F2]

A G-module is a commutative group functor on k-algebras equipped with a left action of G by group homomorphisms. This notion applies to arbitrary algebraic groups. (Hochschild cohomology of algebraic groups and the classification of Hochschild extensions)

[F3]

A natural 1-cocycle f:G→V satisfies f(gh)=f(g)+gf(h), and a 1-coboundary is g↦gm−m. This is valid for general algebraic groups, without an affine coordinate-ring assumption. (Hochschild cohomology of algebraic groups and the classification of Hochschild extensions)

Proof

Given: A field k and an algebraic group G over k.

1.1F1F2

Suppose first that H1(G,M)=0 for every finite-dimensional representation M. For representations E,F, define g⋅a=rF(g)arE(g)−1 on Hom⁡k(E,F) after every base change. This is a natural linear action satisfying the group law, hence a representation in the Given convention and a G-module of [F2]; its invariant vectors are precisely the equivariant maps. Let 0→V′→V→V′′→0 be an exact sequence of finite-dimensional representations. Applying Hom⁡k(V′′,−) gives an exact sequence of these representations, since a vector-space surjection splits linearly. Applying [F1] gives the exact sequence H0(G,Hom⁡(V′′,V))→H0(G,Hom⁡(V′′,V′′))→δH1(G,Hom⁡(V′′,V′)). The identity of V′′ is a G-fixed element of Hom⁡(V′′,V′′), and its image under δ lies in H1(G,Hom⁡(V′′,V′))=0; hence the identity lifts to a G-fixed element of Hom⁡(V′′,V), i.e. to a G-equivariant splitting of the sequence. Every short exact sequence of finite-dimensional representations splits, so every such representation is a direct sum of simple representations and G is linearly reductive.

1.2F2F3

Conversely suppose G is linearly reductive and let f:G→V be a natural 1-cocycle. On W=V⊕k define g⋅(v,a)=(gv+af(g),a), functorially on every base algebra. The cocycle identity [F3] proves the action law; f(e)=0 follows by evaluating the identity at e, so the identity acts trivially. The entries are regular because f is natural, hence a scheme morphism by Yoneda. This is a finite-dimensional rational representation and fits into 0→V→W→k→0. Linear reductivity gives a G-equivariant splitting, whose value at 1 is (m,1). Its invariance means gm+f(g)=m, so f(g)=m−gm is the coboundary of −m. Thus every H1 class vanishes. This argument preserves the full general-group Statement.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2∎

Step1.1 proves vanishing implies linear reductivity, and step1.2 proves the converse through an explicit finite-dimensional cocycle representation. Thus the equivalence holds, with no use of affine free-comodule effacement for a nonaffine group.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources