How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Linear reductivity is equivalent to vanishing of first Hochschild cohomology
Statement
Let be a field and let be an algebraic group over . Then is linearly reductive (every finite-dimensional rational representation of is a direct sum of simple representations) if and only if for every finite-dimensional rational representation of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , a finite-type group scheme over (Group schemes of finite type over a field), and a finite-dimensional rational representation of . Here a representation means a natural family of group homomorphisms for all commutative -algebras ; in finite dimension this is a morphism of group schemes . No affineness of is required for this convention.
For a -module the Hochschild complex has cohomology , is the fixed subgroup, and a short exact sequence of rational -modules induces a long exact sequence in cohomology, because its coefficient vector spaces split linearly and hence its natural cochain maps are surjective. (Hochschild cohomology of algebraic groups and the classification of Hochschild extensions)
A -module is a commutative group functor on -algebras equipped with a left action of by group homomorphisms. This notion applies to arbitrary algebraic groups. (Hochschild cohomology of algebraic groups and the classification of Hochschild extensions)
A natural -cocycle satisfies , and a -coboundary is . This is valid for general algebraic groups, without an affine coordinate-ring assumption. (Hochschild cohomology of algebraic groups and the classification of Hochschild extensions)
Proof
Given: A field and an algebraic group over .
Suppose first that for every finite-dimensional representation . For representations , define on after every base change. This is a natural linear action satisfying the group law, hence a representation in the Given convention and a -module of [F2]; its invariant vectors are precisely the equivariant maps. Let be an exact sequence of finite-dimensional representations. Applying gives an exact sequence of these representations, since a vector-space surjection splits linearly. Applying [F1] gives the exact sequence . The identity of is a -fixed element of , and its image under lies in ; hence the identity lifts to a -fixed element of , i.e. to a -equivariant splitting of the sequence. Every short exact sequence of finite-dimensional representations splits, so every such representation is a direct sum of simple representations and is linearly reductive.
Conversely suppose is linearly reductive and let be a natural -cocycle. On define , functorially on every base algebra. The cocycle identity [F3] proves the action law; follows by evaluating the identity at , so the identity acts trivially. The entries are regular because is natural, hence a scheme morphism by Yoneda. This is a finite-dimensional rational representation and fits into . Linear reductivity gives a -equivariant splitting, whose value at is . Its invariance means , so is the coboundary of . Thus every class vanishes. This argument preserves the full general-group Statement.
Step1.1 proves vanishing implies linear reductivity, and step1.2 proves the converse through an explicit finite-dimensional cocycle representation. Thus the equivalence holds, with no use of affine free-comodule effacement for a nonaffine group.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (v2.00, 20 December 2015 author-hosted preliminary edition) (standard reference, not scraped)