Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Shapiro's lemma for the trivial subgroup and acyclicity of free comodules

Statement

Let k be a field and let G be an affine algebraic group over k with coordinate ring A=O(G), a commutative Hopf algebra (Affine schemes and their coordinate rings, Commutative Hopf algebras over a field). For a k-vector space V let IndG(V) be the G-module whose R-points are the set Nat⁡(GR,VRa) of natural transformations on commutative R-algebras; equivalently, regular VR-valued functions on GR, with G acting by R-points and (g⋅φ)(x)=φ(xg); this is the induced module of the trivial subgroup of G. Then:

(a) Shapiro's lemma. Hn(G,IndG(V))=0 for all n≥1, where H∙ is Hochschild cohomology (Hochschild cohomology of algebraic groups and the classification of Hochschild extensions).

(b) Free comodules are acyclic. Equip V⊗kA with its free A-comodule structure ρ(v⊗a)=v⊗Δ(a), i.e. the comodule structure of Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme. Then IndG(V)≅(V⊗kA)a as G-modules, and consequently Hn(G,V⊗kA)=0for all n≥1.

The pair report records that the general form of Shapiro's lemma for a subgroup H⊆G, Hn(G,IndHGM)≅Hn(H,M), is part of the scaffolded claim but requires homological machinery beyond the present page and is therefore not stated here; only the trivial-subgroup case used by the later items is proved.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, an affine algebraic group G with coordinate Hopf algebra A, and a k-vector space V.

[F1]

Hochschild cochains are natural transformations, with the displayed inhomogeneous coboundary; for rational coefficients W they are W⊗A⊗n. (Hochschild cohomology of algebraic groups and the classification of Hochschild extensions)

[F2]

A rational representation is a comodule, and V⊗A has coaction id⁡V⊗Δ. (Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme)

[F3]

Yoneda identifies natural transformations from an affine represented functor to the additive functor of a vector space with its value on the representing algebra. (evaluate a natural transformation at the universal point over the representing algebra, and recover its other values by base change).

Proof

Given: The data above, with IndG(V)(R)=Nat⁡(GR,VRa) and right-translation action.

1.1F2F3

Over a k-algebra R, Yoneda gives Nat⁡(GR,VRa)=V⊗kR⊗RAR=V⊗kA⊗kR. The identifications are natural under base change. Right translation of a regular function corresponds to id⁡V⊗Δ, so they identify IndG(V) with the additive functor of the free comodule V⊗A.

1.2F1step 1.1algebra

A degree-n cochain with induced coefficients is a regular V-valued function f(g1,…,gn)(x) on Gn+1. Make the invertible change of variables F(x0,…,xn)=f(x0−1x1,x1−1x2,…,xn−1−1xn)(x0). Its inverse sets x0=x and xi=xg1⋯gi. Under these maps the induced-coefficient coboundary becomes δF=∑i=0n+1(−1)iF(x0,…,xi^,…,xn+1): the first term uses right translation of the function argument, the middle terms multiply adjacent differences, and the last deletes the last point.

2.1step 1.2algebra

For n≥1 define sF(x0,…,xn−1)=F(e,x0,…,xn−1). This is regular and natural. The alternating omission formula gives sδ+δs=id⁡: the omission of the inserted identity in sδ gives F, while every remaining term is the corresponding term of δs with opposite sign. Thus if δF=0, then F=δ(sF), so all cohomology in degrees n≥1 vanishes. Transporting through step 1.2 proves (a).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

The natural isomorphism of step 1.1 identifies the complexes for induced coefficients and the free comodule, so their cohomology agrees. Step 2.1 therefore proves Hn(G,V⊗A)=0 for every n≥1, which is (b).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources