How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rational points of smooth finite-type schemes over a separably closed field are schematically dense
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a field with no nontrivial finite separable extension (for example a separably closed or algebraically closed field), let be a reduced finite-type -scheme, and let be a subset. If is dense in the underlying topological space of , then every closed subscheme with equals ; in other words, is schematically dense in .
In particular, if is smooth over , then is dense in and hence schematically dense in . The reducedness hypothesis cannot be dropped: for the closed subscheme has the same underlying space and satisfies , but .
The Axiom of Choice is used through the finite-separable-point lemma and the affine description of closed immersions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a field with no nontrivial finite separable extension, a reduced finite-type -scheme , a dense subset , and a closed subscheme with .
A closed immersion has underlying map a homeomorphism onto a closed subset, and for every affine open there is a unique ideal with over . (Closed immersions of schemes, Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change)
The reduction is the closed subscheme defined by the ideal sheaf of nilpotents; is reduced exactly when , equivalently when every affine chart ring is reduced. (The reduction of a scheme)
Smoothness is preserved by restricting the source to an open subscheme. A smooth scheme over a field is reduced: its local rings are regular by the geometric-regularity clause of smoothness, hence domains and therefore reduced. (Smooth morphism of schemes, regular local domain induction)
Assume AC. Every nonempty smooth finite-type -scheme has a closed point with finite and separable over . (A nonempty smooth scheme has a finite separable point)
For a field and scheme , morphisms correspond bijectively to pairs with and a field embedding ; for this identifies with the points of residue field . (Field-valued points and local-ring points)
Proof
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a field with no nontrivial finite separable extension, a reduced finite-type -scheme , a dense subset , and a closed subscheme with .
By [F1] the underlying space is closed in and contains ; since is dense in , every closed subset containing equals , so .
Assume now that is smooth over , and let be a nonempty open subscheme. Then is smooth over by [F4], nonempty and of finite type, so by [F5] it has a closed point with finite and separable over . By hypothesis on , , and [F6] identifies with a -point of . Hence every nonempty open subscheme of meets , so is dense in .
I claim that . Let be an affine open; by [F1] write for a unique ideal , and by [step 1.1] its underlying space is all of , so and hence every lies in every prime ideal of , i.e. . Since is reduced, is reduced by [F2], so and , giving . As the affine opens cover and two closed subschemes of that agree on an open cover agree, .
Combining: the first assertion is [step 1.1] with [step 2.1]; applying it to the reduced smooth scheme of [F4] with , which is dense by [step 1.2], shows that every closed subscheme with equals , that is, is schematically dense in .
Depends on
- regular local domain induction
- The Axiom of Choice
- Closed immersions of schemes
- The reduction of a scheme
- Smooth morphism of schemes
- Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change
- Field-valued points and local-ring points
- A nonempty smooth scheme has a finite separable point
- Universal property of scheme reduction
Used by
- A nontrivial smooth connected unipotent group with split torus action over a perfect field has a stable central Gₐ Lemma
- A smooth group of multiplicative type is the only closed subscheme containing all its finite subgroups Lemma
- Cartan subgroups: conjugacy, density and normalizers Lemma
- Closed finite-index subgroups of rational points of smooth connected groups over algebraically closed fields are the whole point group Lemma
- Fixed loci are closed and a normal subgroup fixing a point fixes the orbit closure Lemma
- Smooth commutative affine algebraic groups over algebraically closed fields are trigonalizable Proposition
- Borel fixed point theorem for complete schemes Theorem
- Conjugacy of Borel subgroups and of maximal tori over an algebraically closed field Theorem
- Conjugacy of diagonalizable complements and maximal subgroups under smoothness hypotheses Theorem
- Fixed-point schemes and centralizers of linearly reductive actions Theorem
- Lie-Kolchin: smooth connected solvable affine groups over algebraically closed fields are trigonalizable Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)