Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rational points of smooth finite-type schemes over a separably closed field are schematically dense

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field with no nontrivial finite separable extension (for example a separably closed or algebraically closed field), let X be a reduced finite-type k-scheme, and let S⊆X(k) be a subset. If S is dense in the underlying topological space of X, then every closed subscheme Z⊆X with Z(k)⊇S equals X; in other words, S is schematically dense in X.

In particular, if X is smooth over k, then X(k) is dense in X and hence schematically dense in X. The reducedness hypothesis cannot be dropped: for X=Spec⁡k[ε]/(ε2) the closed subscheme Z=Spec⁡k has the same underlying space and satisfies Z(k)=X(k), but Z≠X.

The Axiom of Choice is used through the finite-separable-point lemma and the affine description of closed immersions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a field k with no nontrivial finite separable extension, a reduced finite-type k-scheme X, a dense subset S⊆X(k), and a closed subscheme Z⊆X with Z(k)⊇S.

[F1]

A closed immersion i:Z→X has underlying map a homeomorphism onto a closed subset, and for every affine open U=Spec⁡A⊆X there is a unique ideal I⊆A with i−1(U)≅Spec⁡(A/I) over U. (Closed immersions of schemes, Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change)

[F2]

The reduction Xred is the closed subscheme defined by the ideal sheaf of nilpotents; X is reduced exactly when NX=0, equivalently when every affine chart ring is reduced. (The reduction of a scheme)

[F4]

Smoothness is preserved by restricting the source to an open subscheme. A smooth scheme over a field is reduced: its local rings are regular by the geometric-regularity clause of smoothness, hence domains and therefore reduced. (Smooth morphism of schemes, regular local domain induction)

[F5]

Assume AC. Every nonempty smooth finite-type k-scheme U has a closed point P with κ(P) finite and separable over k. (A nonempty smooth scheme has a finite separable point)

[F6]

For a field K and scheme X, morphisms Spec⁡K→X correspond bijectively to pairs (x,ι) with x∈X and a field embedding ι:κ(x)→K; for K=k this identifies X(k) with the points of residue field k. (Field-valued points and local-ring points)

Proof

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a field k with no nontrivial finite separable extension, a reduced finite-type k-scheme X, a dense subset S⊆X(k), and a closed subscheme Z⊆X with Z(k)⊇S.

1.1F1given

By [F1] the underlying space ∣Z∣ is closed in X and contains Z(k)⊇S; since S is dense in ∣X∣, every closed subset containing S equals ∣X∣, so ∣Z∣=∣X∣.

1.2F4F5F6

Assume now that X is smooth over k, and let U⊆X be a nonempty open subscheme. Then U is smooth over k by [F4], nonempty and of finite type, so by [F5] it has a closed point P with κ(P) finite and separable over k. By hypothesis on k, κ(P)=k, and [F6] identifies P with a k-point of U. Hence every nonempty open subscheme of X meets X(k), so X(k) is dense in X.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

I claim that Z=X. Let U=Spec⁡A⊆X be an affine open; by [F1] write Z∩U=Spec⁡(A/I) for a unique ideal I⊆A, and by [step 1.1] its underlying space is all of U, so V(I)=Spec⁡A and hence every f∈I lies in every prime ideal of A, i.e. I⊆(0). Since X is reduced, A is reduced by [F2], so (0)=0 and I=0, giving Z∩U=U. As the affine opens cover X and two closed subschemes of X that agree on an open cover agree, Z=X.

3.1F4step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2∎

Combining: the first assertion is [step 1.1] with [step 2.1]; applying it to the reduced smooth scheme X of [F4] with S=X(k), which is dense by [step 1.2], shows that every closed subscheme Z⊆X with Z(k)⊇X(k) equals X, that is, X(k) is schematically dense in X.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources