Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fixed loci are closed and a normal subgroup fixing a point fixes the orbit closure

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be an algebraically closed field, let G be a smooth algebraic group of finite type over k acting on a separated finite-type k-scheme X, let H⊆G be a smooth closed normal subgroup scheme, and let y∈X(k) be a point fixed by H(k). Then:

(a) the fixed k-points form a Zariski-closed subset of X(k), namely the k-points of the closed subscheme obtained by intersecting the scheme-theoretic equalizers of h:X→X and the identity for h∈H(k);

(b) the reduced closure Z of the G-orbit of y is stable under G, and the action of H on Z is trivial as a scheme morphism;

(c) for every x∈Z(k) that is fixed by H(k), the scheme-theoretic stabilizer Gx of x contains H.

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the orbit-map and stabilizer suppliers.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, an algebraically closed field k, a smooth finite-type k-group G acting on a separated finite-type k-scheme X, a smooth closed normal subgroup scheme H⊆G, and y∈X(k) fixed by H(k).

[F1]

An action of G on X is a morphism α:G×kX→X satisfying the usual identities. For a rational point x∈X(k) the orbit morphism is ϱx(g)=α(g,x), and its fibre over x is the closed subgroup scheme Gx=G×X,ϱx,xSpec⁡k. It represents T↦{g∈G(T):g⋅xT=xT}, where xT is the base change of the k-point x; its k-points are the set-theoretic stabilizer of x. (Algebraic group actions, orbit maps, orbit subschemes and scheme-theoretic stabilizers, Fibres of the orbit map and the scheme-theoretic stabilizer as a closed subgroup scheme)

[F2]

If f,g:X→Y are k-morphisms with Y separated over k, their scheme-theoretic equalizer is a closed subscheme of X, representing agreement of the two morphisms on every test scheme. (Equalizers into separated schemes are closed, Separated S-scheme)

[F3]

Assume AC. For a smooth finite-type k-scheme U over an algebraically closed field k and a closed subscheme W⊆U, if W(k)⊇S for a dense subset S⊆U(k) then W=U; in particular U(k) is dense in U. (Rational points of smooth finite-type schemes over a separably closed field are schematically dense)

[F4]

The orbit morphism φ:G→X is quasi-compact, and its scheme-theoretic image Z is the smallest closed subscheme receiving it. Since G is reduced, the defining kernels on affine charts are radical, so Z is reduced and is the reduced orbit closure. Its map from G is schematically dominant. Such dominance survives product with a k-scheme: on affine charts the defining joint injections into the finite product of source-chart rings remain injective after tensoring with a k-algebra, since modules over a field are flat. (Scheme-theoretic image of a quasi-compact morphism, Modules over a field are projective, flat, and injective, Scheme-theoretic image, Algebraic group actions, orbit maps, orbit subschemes and scheme-theoretic stabilizers)

Proof

Given: AC, smooth finite-type G and smooth closed normal H over algebraically closed k, separated finite-type X, and y∈X(k) fixed by H(k).

1.1F1F2

For each h∈H(k), its action and the identity are k-morphisms X→X. Their scheme-theoretic equalizer is closed by [F2]. The schematic intersection of these closed equalizers has exactly the k-points fixed by H(k), so these form a closed subset of X(k). Topological invariance of a nonclosed point alone does not imply membership in a scheme-theoretic equalizer. Only k-points are used to define these k-automorphisms; an arbitrary R-point would act on XR. This proves (a).

2.1F1F3step 1.1

The closed subscheme H∩Gy contains every point of H(k), since these fix y. Smoothness of H and [F3] therefore give H⊆Gy scheme-theoretically. Consequently every point of H(R) fixes yR for every base algebra R. Normality then gives h(gyR)=g(g−1hg)yR=gyR, so H fixes the entire orbit morphism on every base algebra. The closed locus in step1.1 contains the orbit and hence its closure Z.

3.1F2F4step 2.1

By [F4], Z is the reduced scheme-theoretic orbit closure. The composite G×G→G×Z→X given by action equals the orbit morphism after multiplication and factors through Z. The map G×G→G×Z is schematically dominant by [F4], so the pullback of the closed ideal defining Z vanishes already on G×Z. Thus the action factors through G×Z→Z, proving scheme stability. Similarly, the two maps H×Z→X given by action and projection agree after the schematically dominant H×G→H×Z, by step2.1. Their closed equalizer [F2] must therefore be the whole H×Z. Hence H fixes Z scheme-theoretically, in particular pointwise, proving (b). No reducedness of ambient X is needed.

4.1F1F3step 3.1∎

For any x∈Z(k) fixed by H(k), the closed subscheme H∩Gx contains H(k). Smooth-point density [F3] makes it all of H, so H⊆Gx, proving (c). Steps1.1,3.1 and4.1 establish the three claims, with the all-base-algebra argument in step2.1 licensed by the preceding scheme-theoretic stabilizer inclusion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources