Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Morphisms from complete connected schemes to affine schemes are constant

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field, let Z be a nonempty complete connected reduced finite-type k-scheme, and let Y be an affine k-scheme of finite type. Then every k-morphism Z→Y is constant: its image is a single closed point of Y.

In particular, a nonempty complete connected reduced affine finite-type k-scheme is the spectrum of a finite field extension of k. Without the reducedness hypothesis the conclusion fails: Spec⁡k[ε]/(ε2) is complete and connected but is not the spectrum of a field.

The Axiom of Choice is used through the finiteness statement for the irreducible components of a Noetherian space and through the global-functions theorem for proper integral schemes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a field k, a nonempty complete connected reduced finite-type k-scheme Z, and an affine finite-type k-scheme Y.

[F1]

A morphism of schemes is of finite type when it is locally of finite type and quasi-compact; a finite-type k-scheme has a finite affine open cover by spectra of finitely generated k-algebras. (Locally finite type and finite type morphisms)

[F2]

A finitely generated algebra over a Noetherian ring is Noetherian; a field is Noetherian. (Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring)

[F3]

The spectrum of a Noetherian commutative ring is a Noetherian topological space. (The spectrum of a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian topological space)

[F4]

A topological space is Noetherian when every descending chain of closed subsets stabilizes; a space admitting a finite open cover by Noetherian subspaces is Noetherian, since a descending chain restricts to each chart and the finitely many stabilization indices can be maximized. (Noetherian topological spaces via ACC on opens or DCC on closed subsets)

[F5]

Assume AC. A Noetherian topological space is a finite union of irreducible closed subsets and therefore has only finitely many irreducible components. (A Noetherian space is a finite union of irreducible closed subsets)

[F6]

An irreducible component of a scheme, regarded as a scheme, carries its reduced induced closed subscheme structure. A nonempty scheme that is reduced and irreducible is integral. (Irreducible components as schemes, Integral schemes)

[F7]

Assume AC. Closed immersions are proper, and a composite of proper morphisms is proper. (Closed immersions are proper, Properness survives composition)

[F8]

Here, for a possibly reducible k-scheme, "complete" means that its structure morphism X→Spec⁡k is proper, that is, separated, of finite type and universally closed. This is the convention used in the hypotheses of this item. The definition of properness applies to arbitrary schemes; on integral separated finite-type k-varieties this convention agrees with the definition of completeness. (Proper morphisms, Complete varieties)

[F9]

Assume AC. If X is a nonempty proper integral finite-type k-scheme, then Γ(X,OX) is a finite field extension of k. (Global functions on proper integral schemes form a finite extension of the base field)

[F10]

For a scheme X and a ring B, taking global sections is a natural bijection Hom⁡(X,Spec⁡B)≅Hom⁡CRing(B,Γ(X,OX)). For B a finitely generated k-algebra this describes k-morphisms X→Spec⁡B by k-algebra maps. (Morphisms to an affine scheme and global sections, Affine schemes and their coordinate rings)

[F11]

Points of Spec⁡B are prime ideals; the point corresponding to a maximal ideal is closed, and V(m)={m} for a maximal ideal m. (The prime spectrum and vanishing sets)

Proof

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a nonempty complete connected reduced finite-type k-scheme Z, an affine finite-type k-scheme Y, and a k-morphism f:Z→Y.

1.1F1F2F3F4choose

By [F1] choose a finite affine open cover Z=U1∪⋯∪Us with Uj=Spec⁡Aj and Aj a finitely generated k-algebra. Each Aj is Noetherian by [F2], so each Uj is a Noetherian topological space by [F3]. A descending chain of closed subsets of Z restricts to descending chains in the finitely many Uj, which stabilize from some index on; the largest of the finitely many indices then stabilizes the chain in Z, because the Uj cover Z. Hence the underlying space of Z is Noetherian by [F4].

1.2F5F6F7F8F9

By [F5] the space Z is a finite union of irreducible closed subsets, so Z has finitely many irreducible components; let Z1,…,Zr be the distinct components, each viewed with its reduced induced closed subscheme structure as in [F6]. Each Zi is nonempty, reduced and irreducible, hence integral by [F6], and each is a closed subscheme of Z. Since Z is complete, Z→Spec⁡k is proper by [F8]; the closed immersion Zi↪Z is proper by [F7], and the composite Zi→Spec⁡k is proper by [F7] again. Thus every Zi is a nonempty proper integral finite-type k-scheme, and [F9] gives that Ki:=Γ(Zi,OZi) is a finite field extension of k.

2.1F9F10F11step 1.2

Write Y=Spec⁡B with B a finitely generated k-algebra; by [F10] the morphism f corresponds to the k-algebra map φ:B→Γ(Z,OZ). Fix i and let ψi:Γ(Z,OZ)→Ki be the restriction. The composite φi=ψi∘φ is a k-algebra map from B into the field Ki, so its image is a k-subalgebra of the finite-dimensional k-vector space Ki; it is a domain of finite dimension over k, hence a field, and its kernel mi is a maximal ideal of B. It follows that the restriction of f to Zi factors through Spec⁡(B/mi)={mi}⊆Y by [F10], that is, f is constant on Zi with value yi, the closed point corresponding to mi by [F11].

3.1step 2.1

Suppose Zi∩Zj≠∅ for some i,j. Choosing a point p in the intersection, step 2.1 gives yi=f(p)=yj. Hence the images of two components that meet coincide. If the components could be split into two nonempty groups with no member of one meeting any member of the other, then the union of each group would be a nonempty closed subset of Z — a finite union of the closed Zi — and the two unions would be disjoint and cover Z, contradicting connectedness of Z. Therefore the intersection graph of Z1,…,Zr is connected, and iterating the observation just made along a path of intersections shows y1=⋯=yr=:y.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1

As the finitely many Zi cover Z by [step 1.2], every point of Z lies in some Zi and therefore has image y; thus f(Z)={y} with y a closed point of Y by [step 2.1]. This proves the first assertion.

5.1F9step 4.1∎

For the final assertion take Y=Z and f=id⁡Z, which is a k-morphism of affine finite-type k-schemes when Z is affine. By [step 4.1] the identity map has image a single point, so the underlying space of Z consists of one point. Then Γ(Z,OZ) is a reduced finite-type k-algebra whose spectrum is a single point, hence a field, and it is finite over k by [F9] applied to Z, which is nonempty proper integral because it is complete, connected, reduced and a single point.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

79 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources