Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Closed finite-index subgroups of rational points of smooth connected groups over algebraically closed fields are the whole point group

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be an algebraically closed field, let G be a smooth connected algebraic group of finite type over k, and let H⊆G(k) be a subgroup that is closed for the Zariski topology on G(k) and of finite index in G(k). Then H=G(k).

The connectedness hypothesis is used: for G=μ2 over an algebraically closed field of characteristic ≠2 the trivial subgroup H={1} of G(k)={±1} is closed of index 2 and H≠G(k), because μ2 is not connected. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the connectedness and density suppliers.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, an algebraically closed field k, a smooth connected finite-type k-group G, and a closed finite-index subgroup H⊆G(k).

[F1]

Assume AC. A smooth connected finite-type k-group scheme is geometrically integral; in particular its underlying space is irreducible. (Connected finite-type groups are geometrically connected)

[F2]

Assume AC. For a smooth finite-type k-scheme X over an algebraically closed field k, the set X(k) is dense in X. (Rational points of smooth finite-type schemes over a separably closed field are schematically dense)

[F3]

A subset of a topological space is irreducible when it is nonempty and not the union of two proper closed subsets; a dense subset of an irreducible space is irreducible, and a finite union of proper closed subsets cannot be the whole space. (Irreducible components as schemes, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention)

Proof

Given: The Axiom of Choice, an algebraically closed field k, a smooth connected finite-type k-group G, and a closed finite-index subgroup H⊆G(k).

1.1F1F2F3

By [F1] the space ∣G∣ is irreducible, and by [F2] the subset G(k) is dense in ∣G∣; a dense subset of an irreducible space is irreducible by [F3], so G(k) is irreducible in the Zariski topology.

1.2F3given

For g∈G(k) let λg:G→G, x↦gx, be left translation; it is an automorphism of k-schemes with inverse λg−1, hence induces a homeomorphism of G(k) onto itself. The cosets of H in G(k) are the images λg(H) of H, and because H is closed in G(k), every coset is closed in G(k); distinct cosets are disjoint and nonempty.

2.1F3step 1.1step 1.2∎

Suppose H≠G(k). Since H has finite index, G(k) is the disjoint union of the finitely many distinct cosets g1H,…,grH with r≥2, each closed and nonempty by [step 1.2]. Then H and the union g2H∪⋯∪grH are two disjoint nonempty closed subsets whose union is G(k), contradicting the irreducibility of G(k) from [step 1.1] by [F3]. Hence H=G(k).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources