How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Closed finite-index subgroups of rational points of smooth connected groups over algebraically closed fields are the whole point group
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be an algebraically closed field, let be a smooth connected algebraic group of finite type over , and let be a subgroup that is closed for the Zariski topology on and of finite index in . Then .
The connectedness hypothesis is used: for over an algebraically closed field of characteristic the trivial subgroup of is closed of index and , because is not connected. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the connectedness and density suppliers.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, an algebraically closed field , a smooth connected finite-type -group , and a closed finite-index subgroup .
Assume AC. A smooth connected finite-type -group scheme is geometrically integral; in particular its underlying space is irreducible. (Connected finite-type groups are geometrically connected)
Assume AC. For a smooth finite-type -scheme over an algebraically closed field , the set is dense in . (Rational points of smooth finite-type schemes over a separably closed field are schematically dense)
A subset of a topological space is irreducible when it is nonempty and not the union of two proper closed subsets; a dense subset of an irreducible space is irreducible, and a finite union of proper closed subsets cannot be the whole space. (Irreducible components as schemes, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention)
Proof
Given: The Axiom of Choice, an algebraically closed field , a smooth connected finite-type -group , and a closed finite-index subgroup .
By [F1] the space is irreducible, and by [F2] the subset is dense in ; a dense subset of an irreducible space is irreducible by [F3], so is irreducible in the Zariski topology.
For let , , be left translation; it is an automorphism of -schemes with inverse , hence induces a homeomorphism of onto itself. The cosets of in are the images of , and because is closed in , every coset is closed in ; distinct cosets are disjoint and nonempty.
Suppose . Since has finite index, is the disjoint union of the finitely many distinct cosets with , each closed and nonempty by [step 1.2]. Then and the union are two disjoint nonempty closed subsets whose union is , contradicting the irreducibility of from [step 1.1] by [F3]. Hence .
Depends on
- Over an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal is an evaluation ideal
- The Axiom of Choice
- Chain dimension and the empty-space convention
- Irreducible components as schemes
- Connected finite-type groups are geometrically connected
- Rational points of smooth finite-type schemes over a separably closed field are schematically dense
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)