Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Semisimple groups in characteristic zero are linearly reductive

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the named suppliers. Let G be a semisimple algebraic group over a field k of characteristic 0. Then every finite-dimensional rational representation of G is semisimple; equivalently, G is linearly reductive (Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme, Simple and semisimple rational representations).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A semisimple algebraic group G over a characteristic-zero field k and a finite-dimensional rational representation (V,r).

[F1]

Descent of semisimplicity. If (Vk′,rk′) is semisimple for a field extension k′⊇k, then (V,r) is semisimple (Semisimplicity of rational representations descends along field extensions).

[F2]

Reduction to codimension one. If X(G)=0, then the following are equivalent: (a) every finite-dimensional rational representation of G is semisimple; (b) every subrepresentation of codimension one is a direct summand; (c) every simple subrepresentation of codimension one is a direct summand (Complete reducibility reduces to splitting codimension-one simple submodules).

[F3]

No characters. X(G)=0, and the same holds after any field extension (Semisimple groups are perfect and have no nontrivial characters).

[F4]

Casimir endomorphism. For a finite-dimensional rational representation (V,r) with gˉ=ρ(g)≠0, the Casimir element cV of the nondegenerate trace form Bρ is a G-module endomorphism of V with tr⁡(cV∣V)=dim⁡kgˉ (The Casimir element of a rational representation is an endomorphism of G-modules).

[F5]

Trivial derived action. If ρ(g)=0 for a rational representation of the connected group G, then V is the trivial representation: ker⁡r is a closed subgroup scheme with Lie⁡(ker⁡r)=ker⁡ρ=g, it is smooth in characteristic 0, and a connected group equals its smooth closed subgroup with the same Lie algebra (The Lie functor: exactness, fixed points and generation, Rational representations and comodules of an affine group scheme, Cartier's theorem: affine group schemes in characteristic zero are smooth).

[F6]

An eigenvalue exists. A linear operator on a nonzero finite-dimensional vector space over an algebraically closed field has an eigenvalue. (Every endomorphism of a nonzero finite-dimensional vector space over an algebraically closed field has an eigenvalue)

[F7]

Every finite subset of a rational representation lies in a finite-dimensional subrepresentation. (Every element of a comodule lies in a finite-dimensional subcomodule)

[A1]

Under AC, every nonempty poset whose chains have upper bounds has a maximal element. (Zorn's lemma)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

It suffices to prove the assertion after extending scalars to an algebraic closure ka of k: if every finite-dimensional representation of Gka is semisimple, then [F1] gives semisimplicity of every finite-dimensional representation of G. We therefore assume in the rest of the proof that k is algebraically closed.

2.1F2F3F5step 1.1algebra

For the algebraically closed field k one has X(G)=0 by [F3], so by [F2] it suffices to verify condition (c): every simple subrepresentation W of codimension one in a finite-dimensional V is a direct summand. If V is trivial, any finite-dimensional linear complement to W is a G-subrepresentation, so the condition holds in every dimension, including zero. Otherwise gˉ=ρ(g)≠0 by [F5], and we may use its Casimir operator.

3.1F3F4step 2.1

Let W be a simple subrepresentation of codimension one in a nonzero finite-dimensional V with gˉ≠0, and let cV be the Casimir endomorphism of [F4]. The quotient V/W is a one-dimensional rational representation, hence trivial by [F3]; therefore gV⊆W. Since cV is a sum of products ρ(x)ρ(y) with x,y∈g, it follows that cV(V)⊆gV⊆W.

4.1F4F6step 3.1algebra

The restriction cV∣W is a G-module endomorphism by [F4]. Since k is algebraically closed and W is nonzero finite-dimensional, it has an eigenvalue a∈k. The kernel of cV∣W−aid⁡W is nonzero and is a G-subrepresentation, because that difference is G-equivariant. Simplicity of W makes this kernel all of W. Hence cV∣W=aid⁡W, by the eigenvalue-kernel argument of Schur's lemma applied directly to the rational G-module.

5.1F4step 3.1step 4.1

The scalar a is nonzero: cV maps V into W, so tr⁡(cV∣V)=tr⁡(cV∣W)=adim⁡W, while [F4] gives tr⁡(cV∣V)=dim⁡kgˉ≠0; hence a≠0. Therefore cV∣W is invertible, ker⁡cV intersects W trivially, cV(V)=W, and dim⁡ker⁡cV=dim⁡V−dim⁡W=1. Since cV is a G-module endomorphism by [F4], its kernel is a G-submodule, and V=W⊕ker⁡cV exhibits W as a direct summand.

6.1F2step 1.1step 5.1

Condition (c) of [F2] holds for every finite-dimensional V by step 5.1, so by [F2] every finite-dimensional rational representation is semisimple; by step 1.1 this descends to the original field.

7.1F7A1step 6.1algebra∎

For an arbitrary rational representation M, order by inclusion the sets of simple submodules whose sum is direct. The empty set is such a family, and the union of a chain is such a family because each finite relation occurs in one member of the chain. By [A1] choose a maximal family with sum S. If S≠M, [F7] gives a finite-dimensional submodule W containing a vector outside S. By step 6.1, W is a finite direct sum of simple submodules. Since W is not contained in S, one such summand C is not contained in S; simplicity gives C∩S=0, so adjoining C extends the family, a contradiction. Therefore M=S is a direct sum of simple submodules, establishing linear reductivity.

Remarks

  • The proof is Milne's Proposition 22.41; the independence from the base field, the reduction to codimension-one simple submodules and the Casimir argument are the three inputs (Milne 22.39, 22.40 and the characteristic-zero section).
  • The hypothesis that G is semisimple enters twice: through X(G)=0 and through the nonvanishing of the Casimir trace dim⁡gˉ.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

69 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources