How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Primary submodules of finite modules are characterized by a singleton associated-prime set
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a Noetherian commutative ring, let be a finitely generated left -module, let be a proper submodule, and let be a prime ideal. Put . Then the following are equivalent:
- is -primary.
- .
- Every acts injectively on , and there exists with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a Noetherian commutative ring , a finitely generated left -module , a proper submodule , a prime ideal , and the quotient .
Zero divisors on a module over a Noetherian ring are exactly the elements lying in its associated primes (Zero divisors on a module over a Noetherian ring are the union of its associated primes).
For a finitely generated module, support is of the annihilator (For a finite module, support is the set of primes containing the annihilator).
Minimal primes in the support of a finite module are associated (Minimal support primes of a finite module are associated).
A proper submodule is -primary exactly when it is primary and (Primary submodules and primary ideals).
A localization or quotient of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian (Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian).
The nilradical of a Noetherian ring is nilpotent (The nilradical of a Noetherian ring is nilpotent).
The support of a finite module is the union of the over its associated primes (The support is the union of the closures of the associated primes).
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, the radical of an ideal is the intersection of the primes containing it (The radical of an ideal is the intersection of the prime ideals containing it).
Proof
Assume is -primary. Then [L4] gives , so every prime in contains by [L2] and [L8]. Let . Every is a zero divisor on , so primaryity makes act nilpotently on and hence some power of lies in . Thus , which proves . Since is minimal in , fact [L3] gives . Now every associated prime contains and is contained in , so .
Assume . By [L1], the zero divisors on are exactly the elements of , so every acts injectively on . Also [L7] gives . Combining this with [L2] shows , and then [L8] yields . Since is Noetherian by [L5], fact [L6] applied to that quotient ring shows that its nilradical is nilpotent. Hence for some , that is, .
Assume condition 3. If is a zero divisor on and , then multiplication by would be both noninjective and injective, impossible. So every zero divisor lies in . Since , each acts nilpotently on , namely . Therefore is primary. Also gives . Conversely, if , then some power of kills . If , multiplication by is injective, hence every power of is injective, so a nonzero power cannot annihilate the nonzero module . Thus . Therefore , and [L4] shows that is -primary.
Steps 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 prove the equivalence of the three conditions.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Associated primes of a module
- Primary submodules and primary ideals
- Zero divisors on a module over a Noetherian ring are the union of its associated primes
- For a finite module, support is the set of primes containing the annihilator
- Minimal support primes of a finite module are associated
- Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian
- The nilradical of a Noetherian ring is nilpotent
- The radical of an ideal is the intersection of the prime ideals containing it
- The support is the union of the closures of the associated primes
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Theorem (18.4) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Propositions 19.5 and 19.16 (standard reference, not scraped)