How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite intersection of primary submodules with one radical is primary
Statement
Let be a Noetherian commutative ring, let be a finitely generated left -module, and let . Let be -primary submodules. Then
is also -primary.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Noetherian commutative ring , a finitely generated left -module , an integer , a prime ideal , and -primary submodules .
A proper submodule is primary exactly when and imply for some (Primary submodules are exactly quotients with nilpotent zero divisors).
A primary submodule is -primary when (Primary submodules and primary ideals).
Proof
Because , one has , so is proper. Suppose and . Choose with . Since is primary, [L1] gives with , so by [L2].
For each , step 1.1 gives , so choose with . The nonempty finite list has a maximum , and then for every , hence . By [L1], the proper submodule is primary.
If , the same finite-maximum argument as in step 2.1 gives a power of in , so . Conversely, if a power of annihilates , it also annihilates every because , so . Thus , and [L2] makes -primary.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Proposition 19.6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Lemma (18.12) (standard reference, not scraped)