Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Localisation of a primary submodule either stays primary or becomes the whole module

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

Let R be a Noetherian commutative ring, let M be a finitely generated left R-module, let Q⊊M be a p-primary submodule for a prime ideal p, and let S⊆R be multiplicative.

  1. If S∩p=∅, then S−1Q is an S−1p-primary submodule of S−1M.
  2. If S∩p≠∅, then S−1Q=S−1M.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a Noetherian commutative ring R, a finitely generated left R-module M, a prime ideal p, a p-primary submodule Q⊊M, and a multiplicative subset S⊆R.

[L1]

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, for a Noetherian commutative ring A, a finitely generated left A-module P, a proper submodule Q′⊊P, and a prime ideal r⊆A, the following are equivalent: Q′ is r-primary; Ass⁡A(P/Q′)={r}; every a∉r acts injectively on P/Q′, and some power of r annihilates P/Q′ (Primary submodules of finite modules are characterized by a singleton associated-prime set).

[L2]

Over a Noetherian commutative ring, associated primes of a finitely generated module localize exactly by extension of primes disjoint from the denominator set (Associated primes commute with localization for finite modules).

[L3]

Localisation commutes with quotient modules, so S−1(M/Q)≅(S−1M)/(S−1Q) (Localisation commutes with quotient modules and arbitrary direct sums).

[L4]

Every localization of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian (Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L3choosealgebra

Put N=M/Q. Since Q is p-primary, [L1] gives n≥1 with pnN=0. If S∩p≠∅, choose s∈S∩p. Then snN=0, so in the localization S−1N the unit s/1 annihilates every element. Hence S−1N=0, and [L3] shows (S−1M)/(S−1Q)=0, that is, S−1Q=S−1M.

1.2L1L2algebra

Assume now that S∩p=∅. Since Q is p-primary, the quotient N has Ass⁡R(N)={p} by [L1]. Fact [L2] therefore gives Ass⁡S−1R(S−1N)={S−1p}. Also pnN=0 from [L1], so (S−1p)nS−1N=0.

2.1L1L3L4step 1.2algebra

Let u=a/s∈S−1R with u∉S−1p. Then a∉p, so multiplication by a on N is injective by [L1]. Because s/1 is a unit, multiplication by u=(a/1)(s/1)−1 on S−1N is also injective. The module S−1M is finitely generated over the Noetherian ring S−1R: if m1,…,mt generate M, then m1/1,…,mt/1 generate S−1M. Hence [L1], applied over S−1R, shows via [L3] that S−1Q is S−1p-primary in S−1M.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove the two localization alternatives.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources