Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Localisation commutes with quotient modules and arbitrary direct sums

Statement

Let R be a commutative ring and let S⊆R be multiplicative.

  1. For every submodule N≤M, there is a natural isomorphism S−1(M/N)≅(S−1M)/(S−1N).
  2. For every family (Mi)i∈I of left R-modules, there is a natural isomorphism S−1 ⁣(⨁i∈IMi)≅⨁i∈IS−1Mi.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R and a multiplicative subset S⊆R.

[L1]

Localisation is naturally (S−1R)⊗R− (Localisation of modules is extension of scalars).

[L2]

Tensoring a right-exact sequence with a fixed module preserves right exactness (Tensoring is right exact).

[L3]

Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums (Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums).

[L4]

A quotient module is the module of cosets M/N (Quotient module M/N with scalar multiplication on additive cosets).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2L4

For a submodule N≤M, the sequence N→M→M/N→0 is right exact, so [L2] and [L1] give a right-exact sequence S−1N→S−1M→S−1(M/N)→0. Therefore S−1(M/N) is the quotient of S−1M by the image of S−1N→S−1M, namely by the submodule S−1N.

1.2L1L3

For a family (Mi)i∈I, [L3] and [L1] give S−1(⨁iMi)≅(S−1R)⊗R(⨁iMi)≅⨁i((S−1R)⊗RMi)≅⨁iS−1Mi.

2.1step 1.1

Thus S−1(M/N)≅(S−1M)/(S−1N) naturally in M and N.

3.1step 2.1step 1.2∎

Steps 2.1 and 1.2 prove the quotient and direct-sum claims.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources