Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Quotient module sheaf and its support

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the existence theorem for the associated sheaf. Let A be a commutative ring with 1 and let I⊆A be an ideal, with quotient module A/I (Quotient module M/N with scalar multiplication on additive cosets). Write X=Spec⁡A, let A/I~ be the associated sheaf of the A-module A/I, and let I~ be the associated sheaf of the ideal I, a subsheaf of OX=A~ (Module sheaf on an affine scheme, The associated module sheaf exists).

Then there is a canonical isomorphism of OX-modules A/I~  ≅  OX/I~, and the support of this sheaf is the closed set Supp⁡(A/I~)=V(I)={p∈Spec⁡A:I⊆p} (The prime spectrum and vanishing sets, Support of a module sheaf). The example includes the two extreme ideals: for I=A one gets A/I=0, both sides are the zero sheaf, and V(A)=∅; for I=0 one gets A/I=A, both sides are OX, and V(0)=X. The module A/I is cyclic, hence finitely generated, and the Axiom of Choice is inherited from the associated-sheaf and support theorems, no new choice being made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring A with 1 and an ideal I⊆A.

[F1]

On a distinguished open D(f)⊆X the associated sheaf has sections M~(D(f))=Mf, with restriction the canonical localisation; these data determine the sheaf (Module sheaf on an affine scheme, Sections of the associated sheaf on basic opens).

[F2]

Localisation commutes with quotients: for f∈A the canonical map (A/I)f→Af/If is an isomorphism, and more generally localisation is right exact so it carries the quotient A→A/I to the quotient Af→Af/If (Localisation commutes with quotient modules and arbitrary direct sums).

[F3]

Stalks of associated sheaves are the localisations: for a prime p one has (M~)p≅Mp, and the stalk of a quotient sheaf is the quotient of the stalks, so (OX/I~)p≅Ap/Ip (The stalk of an associated sheaf is the localisation).

[F4]

The support of an OX-module F is Supp⁡(F)={x:Fx≠0} (Support of a module sheaf); for a finitely generated A-module M on X=Spec⁡A one has Supp⁡(M~)=V(Ann⁡A(M)) (Support of a finite-type quasi-coherent sheaf is closed).

[F5]

For an ideal I⊆A the zero set is V(I)={p:I⊆p}, and V(A)=∅, V(0)=X (The prime spectrum and vanishing sets); moreover Ann⁡A(A/I)=I, because a∈Ann⁡A(A/I) holds exactly when a⋅1∈I (Quotient module M/N with scalar multiplication on additive cosets).

[F6]

The Axiom of Choice as used by the associated-sheaf construction (The Axiom of Choice, The associated module sheaf exists).

Proof technique: direct; compare the two associated sheaves on distinguished opens via exactness of localisation, and compute the support from the stalks of the quotient.

Proof

1.1F1F2

The identification on distinguished opens: for f∈A the localisation of the exact sequence of A-modules 0→I→A→A/I→0 at f is the exact sequence 0→If→Af→(A/I)f→0, so the induced map (A/I)f→Af/If is an isomorphism by [F2]; by [F1] the sections of A/I~, of OX and of I~ on D(f) are (A/I)f, Af and If, so the two sheaves A/I~ and OX/I~ have canonically isomorphic sections on every distinguished open, compatibly with restrictions; as morphisms of OX-modules are determined by their components on the distinguished-open basis and both sides are sheaves, these identifications assemble into a canonical isomorphism A/I~≅OX/I~.

2.1F3F4F5step 1.1

The support: by [F3] the stalk of OX/I~ at a prime p is Ap/Ip, and by step 1.1 the same is the stalk of A/I~; now Ap/Ip=0 exactly when I⊈p, because s∈I with s∉p makes s/1 a unit of Ap lying in Ip, so that Ip=Ap, while for I⊆p one has Ip⊆pAp≠Ap; hence the stalk at p is nonzero if and only if p∈V(I), that is, Supp⁡(A/I~)=V(I) by [F4] and [F5]. This also agrees with Supp⁡(A/I~)=V(Ann⁡A(A/I))=V(I) from the support theorem for the finitely generated module A/I.

3.1F1F4F5F6step 1.1step 2.1∎

The extreme ideals and the choice accounting: if I=A then A/I=0, so A/I~ is the zero sheaf and OX/I~=OX/OX=0, while V(A)=∅ is indeed the support of the zero sheaf; if I=0 then A/I=A, so A/I~=OX, while I~=0 as the associated sheaf of the zero ideal, so OX/I~=OX, and V(0)=X. The only appeal to the Axiom of Choice is the inherited one in [F1] and [F4], and the module A/I is cyclic, generated by the class of 1, so the finite-generation hypothesis of the support theorem is met without any selection.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources